도스토예프스키의 「온순한 여자」에 나타난 “오만”과 “온순”의 구조 시학 = Poetics of Arrogance and Meekness in 『A Meek Creature』 of F. M. Dostoevsky

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The primary goal of this paper is to pursue the main idea of 『A Meek Creature』 of F. M. Dostoevsky through its structural peculiarity. Many critics have analyzed this work, focusing on the eminent structure of interior monologue with which the husband of a meek woman, who committed suicide just before, narrates his own psychology. But analyzing contents of this work only under this structural frame hinders us from concrete understanding of internal world of the meek woman who attains not only the trait of meekness but also of arrogance. In the <From the author> of this work we can understand that Dostoevsky uses artistic variations which help to successfully forming the shape of the heroine of this work. From this we can understand that husband and wife of this work share the traits of meekness and arrogance. The exact meaning of meekness reveals itself on the changed shape of young wife of part two of this work and in the scene when she commits suicide with an icon in her hand. This represents symbolically that she has taken her own life with the spirit of unity with her husband who oppressed her with his own philosophy of silentness which is based on his hatred against the world. Such a silent death of meekness which takes the fault of her husband for herself represents the right essence of meekness which Dostoevsky wanted to cultivate in the chaotic russian society of that time.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 라브린, 얀코, "도스토예프스키" 행림출판사 1981

2 Клейман П. Я, "Сквозные мотивы творчества Достоевского; В историко-культурной перспективе" Штиинца 1985

3 Захаров В. Н, "Система Жанров Достоевского" Издательство Ленинградского Университета 1985

4 Туниманов В. А, "Приёмы повествования в ≪Кроткой≫ Ф. М. Достоевского, In Вести. Ленинградского университета" языка и литературы 1965

5 Достоевский Ф. М, "Полное собрание сочинений в тридцати томах" Наука 1990

6 Бекедин П. В, "Повесть ≪Кроткая≫: К истолкованию образа мёртвого солнца, In Достоевский: Материалы и Исследования" Наука 102-124, 1988

7 Фридлендер Г, "О некоторых очередных задачах и проблемах изучения Достоевского, In Достоевский: Материалы и исследования. т. 4" Наука 7-26, 1988

8 Бердяев Н. А, "Миросозерцание Достоевского" Аст 2006

9 Кожевникова В. М, "Литературный Энциклопедический Словарь" Советская Энциклопедия 1987

10 Гус М, "Достоевского" Художественная литература 1971

11 Гроссман Л, "Достоевский" Молодая гвардия 1963

12 Cox G, "Tyrant and Victim in Dostoevsky" Slavica Publisher's 1984

13 Pachmuss Temira, "Theme of Vanity in Dostoevskij's works" 7 (7): 142-159, 1963

14 Walsh H, "The Permutations of Complex Metaphor: Dostoevsky's Sunsets" 27 (27): 293-301, 1983

15 Bakhtin M, "Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. trans. Caryl Emerson" University of Minnesota Press 1984

16 Mochulsky K, "Dostoevsky: His Life and Work" Princeton Univ. Press 1967

17 Hingley R, "Dostoevsky: His Life and Work" Charles Scribner's Sons 1978

18 Holquist M, "Dostoevsky and the Novel" Princeton Univ. Press 1977

19 Magarshack D, "Dostoevsky" Greenwood Press 1962

20 Jones J, "Dostoevsky" Oxford Univ. Press 1985

21 Gide André, "Dostoevsky" Secker&Warburg 1952