RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      TSI Aerodynamic Particle Sizer 3321, Grimm Aerosol Spectrometer 1.109, HCT Particle Sensor 3030을 이용한 PM2.5 측정결과 비교 = Comparison Study of the TSI Aerodynamic Particle Sizer 3321, Grimm Aerosol Spectrometer 1.109 and HCT Particle Sensor 3030 for PM2.5 measurement

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101616227

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Three different commercial particle counters were used to measure the PM2.5 particles in this study. An Aerosol Spectrometer (AS) 1.109 model of Grimm and a Particle Sensor (PS) 3030 model of HCT were compared with an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS) 3321 model of TSI. The responses of these instruments were compared for four sizes (1.0㎛, 1.5㎛, 2.0㎛ and 2.5㎛) of polystyrene latex (PSL) particles and indoor air particles of the office room. The mode diameter, particle size distribution and total particle number concentration of PSL particles were measured by each instrument. In the office room, the total particle number concentration was measured for 25 minutes. In results of particle size distribution and mode diameter, the APS 3321 (52 size-channels) was more accurate than the AS 1.109 (31 size-channels) and PS-3030 (10-szie channels) since the APS has more number of size-channels than the other instruments. However, AS 1.109 and PS-3030 provided similar results of total particle number concentration to those from the APS 3321. In results of office room test, there were no significant difference from each instrument similar to results of PSL test.
      번역하기

      Three different commercial particle counters were used to measure the PM2.5 particles in this study. An Aerosol Spectrometer (AS) 1.109 model of Grimm and a Particle Sensor (PS) 3030 model of HCT were compared with an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS) ...

      Three different commercial particle counters were used to measure the PM2.5 particles in this study. An Aerosol Spectrometer (AS) 1.109 model of Grimm and a Particle Sensor (PS) 3030 model of HCT were compared with an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS) 3321 model of TSI. The responses of these instruments were compared for four sizes (1.0㎛, 1.5㎛, 2.0㎛ and 2.5㎛) of polystyrene latex (PSL) particles and indoor air particles of the office room. The mode diameter, particle size distribution and total particle number concentration of PSL particles were measured by each instrument. In the office room, the total particle number concentration was measured for 25 minutes. In results of particle size distribution and mode diameter, the APS 3321 (52 size-channels) was more accurate than the AS 1.109 (31 size-channels) and PS-3030 (10-szie channels) since the APS has more number of size-channels than the other instruments. However, AS 1.109 and PS-3030 provided similar results of total particle number concentration to those from the APS 3321. In results of office room test, there were no significant difference from each instrument similar to results of PSL test.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박영옥, "실내 생활공간에서의 미세먼지 오염 특성 및 제어 기술" 9 (9): 122-128, 2002

      2 환경부, "실내 공기 중 미세먼지 측정방법, 실내 공기질 공정시험기준"

      3 김신도, "미세먼지 규제와 영향" 15 (15): 19-28, 2002

      4 환경부, "다중이용시설등의 실내공기질관리법 시행규칙"

      5 Mitsakou, C, "Lung deposition of fine and ultrafine particles outdoors and indoors during a cooking event and a no activity period" 17 : 143-152, 2007

      6 Shin D.C., "Health effects of ambient particulate matter" 50 (50): 175-182, 2007

      7 Kim, Y.S., "Health effect of indoor air polution" 24 (24): 29-32, 1995

      8 U. S. EPA, "Guidance for using continuous monitors in PM2.5 mornitoring networks, Office of Air Quality Planning and standards U.S"

      9 Peters, T.M., "Concentration measurement and counting efficiency of the aerodynamic particle sizer 3321" 34 : 627-634, 2003

      10 Peters, T.M., "Comparison of the Grimm 1.108 and 1.109 Portable Aerosol Spectrometer to the TSI 3321 Aerodynamoc Particle Sizer for dry particles" 50 (50): 843-850, 2006

      1 박영옥, "실내 생활공간에서의 미세먼지 오염 특성 및 제어 기술" 9 (9): 122-128, 2002

      2 환경부, "실내 공기 중 미세먼지 측정방법, 실내 공기질 공정시험기준"

      3 김신도, "미세먼지 규제와 영향" 15 (15): 19-28, 2002

      4 환경부, "다중이용시설등의 실내공기질관리법 시행규칙"

      5 Mitsakou, C, "Lung deposition of fine and ultrafine particles outdoors and indoors during a cooking event and a no activity period" 17 : 143-152, 2007

      6 Shin D.C., "Health effects of ambient particulate matter" 50 (50): 175-182, 2007

      7 Kim, Y.S., "Health effect of indoor air polution" 24 (24): 29-32, 1995

      8 U. S. EPA, "Guidance for using continuous monitors in PM2.5 mornitoring networks, Office of Air Quality Planning and standards U.S"

      9 Peters, T.M., "Concentration measurement and counting efficiency of the aerodynamic particle sizer 3321" 34 : 627-634, 2003

      10 Peters, T.M., "Comparison of the Grimm 1.108 and 1.109 Portable Aerosol Spectrometer to the TSI 3321 Aerodynamoc Particle Sizer for dry particles" 50 (50): 843-850, 2006

      11 Bae, G. N., "Comparison of ambient aerosol size distributions observed by using an APS and two OPCs" 37 : 97-98, 2004

      12 Burkart, J., "Characterizing the performance of two optical particle counters( Grimm OPC1.108 and OPC 1.109) under urban aerosol conditions" 41 (41): 953-962, 2010

      13 Hinds, W. C., "Aerosol Technology" A Wiley-interscience publication 75-378, 1999

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (등재후보2차)
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (기타) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼