RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      위해정보를 활용한 한국형 제품 위험성 평가 모델 개발에 관한 연구 = Developing a Product Risk Assessment Model for Korea Using Injury Data

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99888638

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: The recent major recalls of hazardous products caused consumer product safety acts to be strengthen worldwide. Although the recall system of hazardous products in Korea has been operating based on Framework Act on Product Safety since 2011, t...

      Purpose: The recent major recalls of hazardous products caused consumer product safety acts to be strengthen worldwide. Although the recall system of hazardous products in Korea has been operating based on Framework Act on Product Safety since 2011, the evaluation of product risk has been relied on not the results of objective incident data but the results of illegal product investigations. The purpose of this paper is to propose a product risk assessment model for Korea using injury data. Methods: The authors derived Korea`s risk assessment method by analysing the advantages and disadvantages of the most widely used models in advanced countries such as EU`s RAPEX RAG and Janpan`s R-MAP. In this study,the level of relative frequency and severity of injury are determined based on the objective incident data and the length of hospitalization respectively. In addition, the injury data occurred during 2011 is applied to the proposed risk assessment model for case study. Results: The data analysed in this paper can be classified as high risk, medium risk, low risk, acceptable risk, and safe products th rough the matrix f rom the combination of the relative f requency and the severity derived. Conclusion: The proposed risk assessment model in this study has advantage obtaining reliable objective results because it uses actual injury data and redeems the drawbacks of the existing models used in advanced countries. Furthermore, because the proposed model shows the high risk products among many, it is expected to be useful especially for customs whose main job is inspecting the imported goods and the government when selecting the target product groups for safety investigation.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 CFR(Code of Federal Regulation), "Title 21. 2013. Volume 8. 21CFR821"

      2 "The road traffic law enforcement regulations of Korea: Attached form 28"

      3 Intergen Consulting Group, "Survey results on customers' perceptions of product safety" KATS(Korean Agency for Technology and Standard) 2013

      4 Minhyung, K., "Risks of Global Production Systems: Lessons from Toyota's Mass Recalls"

      5 Marucheck, A., "Product safety and security in the global supply chain: Issues, challenges and research opportunities" 29 (29): 707-720, 2011

      6 Matsumoto, K., "Product safe, the utilization of R-Map for risk management"

      7 Dowling, G. R, "Perceived risk: the concept and its measurement" 3 (3): 193-210, 1986

      8 Iyer, Madhu, "Managing Risks of Consumer Products, In Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Analysis and Assessment" 2008

      9 ISO/IEC, "ISO/IEC Guide 51: “Safety aspects – Guidelines for their inclusion in standards.”"

      10 Speier, C., "Global supply chain design considerations: Mitigating product safety and security risks" 29 (29): 721-736, 2011

      1 CFR(Code of Federal Regulation), "Title 21. 2013. Volume 8. 21CFR821"

      2 "The road traffic law enforcement regulations of Korea: Attached form 28"

      3 Intergen Consulting Group, "Survey results on customers' perceptions of product safety" KATS(Korean Agency for Technology and Standard) 2013

      4 Minhyung, K., "Risks of Global Production Systems: Lessons from Toyota's Mass Recalls"

      5 Marucheck, A., "Product safety and security in the global supply chain: Issues, challenges and research opportunities" 29 (29): 707-720, 2011

      6 Matsumoto, K., "Product safe, the utilization of R-Map for risk management"

      7 Dowling, G. R, "Perceived risk: the concept and its measurement" 3 (3): 193-210, 1986

      8 Iyer, Madhu, "Managing Risks of Consumer Products, In Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Analysis and Assessment" 2008

      9 ISO/IEC, "ISO/IEC Guide 51: “Safety aspects – Guidelines for their inclusion in standards.”"

      10 Speier, C., "Global supply chain design considerations: Mitigating product safety and security risks" 29 (29): 721-736, 2011

      11 Rider, G., "Framework model of product risk assessment" 16 (16): 73-80, 2009

      12 Stamatis, D. H., "Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution" ASQ Quality Press. United States of America 1995

      13 Floyd, P. J., "Establishing a comparative inventory of approaches and methods used by enforcement authorities for the assessment of the safety of consumer products covered by Directive 2001/95/EC on general product safety and identification of best practices" Risk & Policy Analysis Limited for European Commons Directorate General SANCO. UK 2006

      14 Mitchell, V. W., "Consumer perceived risk: conceptualisations and models" 33 (33): 163-195, 1999

      15 Bauer, R. A., "Consumer behavior as risk taking" 389-398, 1960

      16 Van Duijne, F. H., "Considerations in developing complete and quantified methods for risk assessment" 46 (46): 245-254, 2008

      17 EU Official Journal, "Commission Decision of 16 December 2009, laying down guidelines for the management of the Community Rapid Information System ‘RAPEX’ established under Article 12 and of the notification procedure established under Article 11 of Directive 2001/95/EC (the General Product Safety Directive), L22/1"

      18 "Accessed on 2013. 8. 23"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-07-01 평가 등재후보로 하락(현장점검) (기타) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-03 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.88 0.88 0.8
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.93 1 0.751 0.38
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼