RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    미국에서의 사회다윈주의와 우생학: 도덕주의자들의 실패한 기획 = Social Darwinism and Eugenics in the United States: The Failed Plan of the Moralist

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103990285

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article starts with critical analysis about the role the biology, especially the evolution and genetics played in the history and society. So this article tris to answer how reasonable it really is to analyze the human and society biologically as the advocates of Social Darwinism and eugenics of the U.S. did during the end of 19th century and the beginning of 20th century. In particular, this article is to look into the ideology and practice of Herbert Spencer, William G. Sumner and Charles B. Davenport, whose names were raised as the prime advocates of Social Darwinism and eugenics in the U.S. They attempted to defend traditional morality of the U.S. which was supposed to be faced with crisis, and tried to draw a new image of the future by combining their religious and social desire with evolutionary science in vain.
    Spencer, Sumner and Davenport believed that human nature as well as morality and the evil and pain of society were the object of biological analysis and the answer to the social problems could be provided by science such as rule of evolution and heredity. However, their religious and social desire ended up in justification of capitalistic and imperial competition and excluding the minority and socially weak from the society. It is doubtful whether it is possible to draw new norm and order of society with the information related to physiological characteristic of a human, and whether it is possible to interpret biologically the problems of human pain such as social crime, poverty and ignorance.
    We witness a flux of efforts to interpret ourselves in terms of evolutionary processes, including who we are, why we are here, and how we should live. The appearance of the ideology and practice of the advocates of social Darwinism and eugenics of the U.S. in the end of 19th and the beginning of 20th centuries will offer a poignant caveat for those upsurge of biologizing tendency on human life and society.
    번역하기

    This article starts with critical analysis about the role the biology, especially the evolution and genetics played in the history and society. So this article tris to answer how reasonable it really is to analyze the human and society biologically as...

    This article starts with critical analysis about the role the biology, especially the evolution and genetics played in the history and society. So this article tris to answer how reasonable it really is to analyze the human and society biologically as the advocates of Social Darwinism and eugenics of the U.S. did during the end of 19th century and the beginning of 20th century. In particular, this article is to look into the ideology and practice of Herbert Spencer, William G. Sumner and Charles B. Davenport, whose names were raised as the prime advocates of Social Darwinism and eugenics in the U.S. They attempted to defend traditional morality of the U.S. which was supposed to be faced with crisis, and tried to draw a new image of the future by combining their religious and social desire with evolutionary science in vain.
    Spencer, Sumner and Davenport believed that human nature as well as morality and the evil and pain of society were the object of biological analysis and the answer to the social problems could be provided by science such as rule of evolution and heredity. However, their religious and social desire ended up in justification of capitalistic and imperial competition and excluding the minority and socially weak from the society. It is doubtful whether it is possible to draw new norm and order of society with the information related to physiological characteristic of a human, and whether it is possible to interpret biologically the problems of human pain such as social crime, poverty and ignorance.
    We witness a flux of efforts to interpret ourselves in terms of evolutionary processes, including who we are, why we are here, and how we should live. The appearance of the ideology and practice of the advocates of social Darwinism and eugenics of the U.S. in the end of 19th and the beginning of 20th centuries will offer a poignant caveat for those upsurge of biologizing tendency on human life and society.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 하워드 L. 케이, "현대생물학의 사회적 의미" 뿌리와 이파리 2008

    2 김기윤, "헉슬리의 “진화와 윤리”: 시대의 초상" 한국과학사학회 28 (28): 55-79, 2006

    3 Thomas H. Huxley, "진화와 윤리" 지식을 만드는 지식 2009

    4 문상화, "진화론: 19세기 영국의 지배담론의 한 양상" 영국사학회 5 : 25-41, 2001

    5 찰스 다윈, "인간의 유래 2" 한길사 571-, 2006

    6 김호연, "우생학의 형성과 전개(1860-1945)에 관한 연구" 강원대학교 2006

    7 김호연, "우생학에 대한 다층적 접근 : 유전, 환경 그리고 이념" 한국환경법학회 27 (27): 139-158, 2005

    8 앙드레 피쇼, "우생학, 유전학의 숨겨진 역사" 아침이슬 140-159, 2009

    9 김호연, "우생학, 유전자 정치의 역사" 아침이슬 29-31, 2009

    10 김호연, "사회다윈주의의 형성과 전개에 관한 연구" 강원대학교 1999

    1 하워드 L. 케이, "현대생물학의 사회적 의미" 뿌리와 이파리 2008

    2 김기윤, "헉슬리의 “진화와 윤리”: 시대의 초상" 한국과학사학회 28 (28): 55-79, 2006

    3 Thomas H. Huxley, "진화와 윤리" 지식을 만드는 지식 2009

    4 문상화, "진화론: 19세기 영국의 지배담론의 한 양상" 영국사학회 5 : 25-41, 2001

    5 찰스 다윈, "인간의 유래 2" 한길사 571-, 2006

    6 김호연, "우생학의 형성과 전개(1860-1945)에 관한 연구" 강원대학교 2006

    7 김호연, "우생학에 대한 다층적 접근 : 유전, 환경 그리고 이념" 한국환경법학회 27 (27): 139-158, 2005

    8 앙드레 피쇼, "우생학, 유전학의 숨겨진 역사" 아침이슬 140-159, 2009

    9 김호연, "우생학, 유전자 정치의 역사" 아침이슬 29-31, 2009

    10 김호연, "사회다윈주의의 형성과 전개에 관한 연구" 강원대학교 1999

    11 박진빈, "백색제국건설사" 앨피 2006

    12 이형대, "미국 지성사에서 윌리엄 그레험 섬너의 자연주의 사상과 보수주의" 4 : 135-, 1996

    13 김호연, "미국 우생학 운동의 형성과 사회적 영향, 1900-1940" 한국미국사학회 16 : 133-158, 2002

    14 정세권, "대번포트(Charles Benedict Davenport)의 우생학 연구" 서울대학교 2006

    15 김호연, "과학과 이념 사이의 우생학" 한국동서철학회 (48) : 243-266, 2008

    16 Andrew Carnegie, "Wealth" 148 : 653-664, 1889

    17 Gertrude Himmelfarb, "Victorian Minds" Harper & Row 1968

    18 H. Spencer, "The Study of Sociology" 1 : 1-17, 1872

    19 H. Spencer, "The Study of Sociology" 3 : 46-57, 1873

    20 Franklin H. Giddings, "The Struggle for Human Existence" Studies in the Theory of Human Society 3-18, 1922

    21 Howard L. Kaye, "The Social Meaning of Modern Biology: From Social Darwinism to Sociobiology" J.J.: Transaction Publishers 1997

    22 데이븐포트, "The Skin Colors of the Races of Mankind" 26 : 44-49, 1926

    23 Madison Grant, "The Passing of the Great Race" Charles Scribner’s Sons 1916

    24 Charles Darwin, "The Origin of Species: by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life" Penguin Books 153-155, 1968

    25 H. Spencer, "The Inadequacy of Natural Selection" 42 : 799-812, 1893

    26 Robert L. Carneiro, "The Evolution of Society Selection from Herbert Spencer’s Principles of Sociology" University of Chicago Press ⅹ.-, 1974

    27 Garland E. Allen, "The Eugenics Record Office, Cold Spring Harbor, 1910-1940: An Essay in Institutional History" 2 : 225-264, 1986

    28 데이븐포트, "The Effect of Race Intermingling" 65 : 364-368, 1917

    29 William G. Sumner, "The Concentration of Wealth: Its Economic Justification in The Challenge of Facts and Other Essays" Yale University Press 81-90, 1914

    30 William G. Sumner, "The Challenge of Facts and Other Essays" Yale Univ. Press 68-, 1914

    31 Leslie C. Dunn, "Some Results of Race Mixture in Hawii" 2 : 109-124, 1923

    32 Paul Crook, "Social Darwinism: Some Historiographical Reflection" 39 (39): 88-94, 1993

    33 W. E. Leuchtenburg, "Social Darwinism: Selected Essays of Grahan Sumner" Prentice-Hall Inc. 1963

    34 Robert C. Bannister, "Social Darwinism: Science and Myth in Anglo-American Social Thought" Temple University Press 1979

    35 R. J. Halliday, "Social Darwinism: A Definition" 14 : 389-405, 1971

    36 Richard Hofstadter, "Social Darwinism in American Thought" George Braziller 1959

    37 John C. Green, "Science, Ideology, and World View: Essays in the History of Evolutionary Ideas" California University Press 95-130, 1981

    38 Charles B. Davenport, "Report of Committee on Eugenics" Ⅰ : 126-129, 1911

    39 Michael Banton, "Racial Consciousness" Longman 1988

    40 H. Spencer, "Private Relief of the Poor" 43 : 315-316, 1893

    41 H. Spencer, "Predatory and Industry Society" 9 : 732-, 1876

    42 John W. Burgess, "Political Science and Comparative Constitutional Law vol. 1 & 2" Ginn & Co. 1891

    43 John Fiske, "Outlines of Cosmic Philosophy, vol. 2" Houghton Mifflin & Co. 1874

    44 Josiah Strong, "Our Country" The American Home Missionary Society i-v, 1885

    45 Sumner, "On the Reasons Why Man Is Not Altogether a Brute"

    46 Peter J. Bowler, "Malthus, Darwin, and The Concept of Struggle" 37 (37): 631-650, 1976

    47 Sidney Fine, "Laissez Faire and the General-Welfare State: A Study of Conflict in American Thought 1865-1901" University of Michigan Press 3-, 1956

    48 F. Galton, "Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development" Macmillan 17-, 2001

    49 Daniel J. Kevles, "In the name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity" Harvard University Press 51-, 1995

    50 Carl N. Degler, "In Search of Human Nature: The Decline and Revival of Darwinism in American Social Thought" Oxford University Press 1991

    51 C. B. Davenport, "How to Make a Eugenical Family Study" 13 : 4-, 1915

    52 C. B. Davenport, "Heredity in Relation to Eugenics" Henry Holt 252-254, 1911

    53 J. D. Y. Peel, "Herbert Spencer: On Social Evolution" Univ. Chicago Press 38-52, 1972

    54 E. L. Youmans, "Herbert Spencer and the Doctrine of Evolution" 6 : 20-48, 1874

    55 William G. Sumner, "Folkways: A Study of Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals" Ginn 28-30, 1940

    56 J. W. Burrow, "Evolution and Society: A Study in Victorian Social Theory" Cambridge U. P. 1966

    57 John Dewey, "Evolution and Ethics" 8 : 12-17, 1898

    58 Donald K. Pickens, "Eugenics and the Progressive" Vanderbilt University 44-45, 1968

    59 Albert G. Keller, "Essays of William Graham Sumner, vol. 2" Yale Univ. Press 1934

    60 Frank X. Ryan, "Darwin’s Impact: Social Evolution in America, 1880-1920 Vol. 1" Thoemmes Press xi-xii, 2001

    61 Jacob Gould Schurman, "Darwinism and the Foundations of Morals" The Ethical Import of Darwinism 115-160, 1887

    62 Charles E. Rosenberg, "Charles B. Davenport and the Irony of American Eugenics in No Other Gods: On Science and American Social Thought" Johns Hopkins Univ. Press 89-97, 1976

    63 Mark Pittenger, "American Socialists and Evolutionary Thought, 1870-1920" The University of Wisconsin Press 1993

    64 Herbert Spencer, "A Theory of Population, Deduced from the General Law of Animal Fertility" 1 : 501-, 1852

    65 H. Spencer, "A Rejoinder to M. De Laveleye" 27 : 193-, 1885

    66 John Fiske, "A Century of Science and Other Essays" Houghton Mifflin & Co. 1899

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : HANGUK KWAHAK-SA HAKHOE-JI -> The Korean Journal for the History of Science KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.42 0.42 0.46
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.48 0.47 0.697 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼