개정 상법상의 해상화물운송장에 관한 법적 쟁점 = Legal Issues on the Sea Waybill in Revised Korean Commercial Code

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

There exist problems according to the performance of a contract in international trade. As matters now stand, Sea Waybill is on trial as a new substitute for it on account of the crisis of B/L. Yet Sea Waybill, not being a document of title, has also exposed a new problem in practical use although it has greatly contributed to the swiftness of transportation documents.
The CMI proposed in 1990 its Uniform Rules for Sea Waybills. These Uniform are not in the form of a Convention and, to be applicable, would have to be incorporated into many of the modern waybills. The Uniform Rules deal with issues such an agency, rights and responsibilities of the carrier, the respective rights of control over the goods and their delivery as between shipper and consignee. The paper accepted main ideas of the Uniform Rules of CMI to make proposal of the Sea Waybill.
Although the CMI has formulated unified rules governing Sea Waybill to replace the existing B/L, its lack of negotiability could cause troubles when selling and buying it. The discussion is based on CMI unified rules. Besides problems of putting them to practical use and possible solutions are discussed.
Therefore a possible solution is to use, Sea Waybill instead of B/L, as documentation which the consignee does not need to present to obtain delivery of the goods. Sea Waybill is such a document, because it is not, unlike the B/L, a negotiable document, and delivery is made to named consignee.
So this paper researches the characteristics of Sea Waybill and suggest legal solutions. It shows the character of Sea Waybill and compares Sea Waybill and B/L. It also reviews the Lawful situations of other countries and compares the Uniform Rules of CMI and the commercial law in Korea. It discusses the problems in using Sea Waybill on the international trade and investigates the solutions of those problems.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정완용, "해상화물운송장의 입법방안에 관한 고찰" 26 (26): 2004

2 공신영, "해상화물운송장의 운용상 문제점에 관한 소고" 창원대 2003

3 한낙현, "해상화물운송장의 실용상의 문제점에 관한 연구" 23 : 2004

4 오원석, "해상화물운송장(Sea Waybill)의 문제점에 관한 소고" 8 : 1993

5 김효진, "해상화물운송장 사용의 활성화에 관한 연구" (30) : 2000

6 오세영, "선하증권의 무서류화" (299) : 2001

7 김필곤, "선하증권과 UNCITRAL 운송법 협약에서의 운송증권" 국제거래법학회 16 (16): 2007

8 엄윤대, "국제무역운송에 있어서 선하증권 효력상의 문제에 따른 대체운송증권의 활용에 관한 연구" 한국해양대 2002

9 한성일, "국제무역거래에서 EDI메시지활용상의 문제점에 관한 연구" 동아대 대학원 1996

10 藤田和孝, "運送契約と運送證券-代替的運送證券としての海上運送狀-" (181) : 2004

11 日本貿易關係手續簡易化協會, "貿易手續のEDI化に係る法的諸問題" JASTPRO刊 91-19 1991

12 新堀聰, "貿易取引の理論と實踐 -最近の貿易取引における舊來のメカニズムの破綻とその解決策に關する硏究-" 三嶺書房 1993

13 西道彦, "貿易取引の電子化" 同文? 2003

14 新堀 聰, "海上運送狀について" 19 : 1991

15 江頭憲治郞, "海上運送狀と電子式船荷證券" (32) : 1988

16 日本貿易關係手續簡易化協會, "海上?航空貨物に係る輸出入制度手續の調査硏究" JASTPRO 刊 89-16 1990

17 新堀 聰, "實踐貿易取引 -最新基礎理論と實務のポイント" 日本經濟新聞社 1998

18 Tetley,W, "Waybills : The Modern Contract of Carriage of Goods by Sea" 15 : 1984

19 Gordon Humphreys, "Waybill : A Case of Common Law Laissez Faire in European Commerce" 1992

20 김인현, "UNCITRAL 운송법회의에서의 운송증권의 문언성에 대한 고찰" 21 (21): 2007

21 박세운, "UCP 600 해상운송서류 규정의 주요 개정사항에 관한 연구" 35 : 2007

22 William Tetley, "Marine Cargo Claims, 3rd ed" Blais 1989

23 Jan Ramberg, "ICC Guide to Incoterms 2000" ICC Publication 1999

24 Treitel, G, "Carver on Bills of Lading" Sweet & Maxwell 2001

25 Paul Todd, "Bills of Lading and Bankers' documentary Credits, 1st ed" Lloyd's of London Press Ltd. 1990

26 Guest A. G, "Benjamin's Sale of Goods(5th ed.)" Sweet & Maxwell 1997

27 Lisa Chin, "2006 Annual Survey of Letter of Credit Law & Practice America Conference Summary" Documentary Credit World 2006

28 三倉八市, "1993年信用狀統一規則(UCP500)とSea WaybillおよびAir Way- bill" (33) : 1996