평창 마하생태관광지의 주민 주도 운영 과정과 참여자의 태도에 관한 주관성 분석 = Analysis of Resident-oriented Management Process & It`s Participants Subjectivities in Maha Ecotourism, Pyeongchang-gun

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In analyzing the issues of ecotourism, collecting opinions of local residents and participants is an essential process because ecotourism needs to keep ecological sensitivity and respect local residents’ ecological lives. Thus, the objective of this study is to analyze the local participants’ attitude in resident-oriented ecotourism. Maha ecotourism site, as a study site, is located in Pyeongchang-gun, one of the twelve ecotourism sites designated by the Ministry of Environment. This site has drawn attention since the local government of Pyeongchang-gun transferred its management right on Maha ecotourism sit to the organization of local residents in 2013. This study uses Q methodology which is the most popular research method in analyzing people’s subjectivity, that is, viewpoint and attitude. This study have found that there are four features in the subjectivities of participants toward ecotourism site: first group is the people who want more autonomous management right of local residents on Maha ecotourism site. Second group is the people who only want to stand by the ecotourism management. Third group is the people who focus on the migration of talented persons into their neighborhood owing to the program. Lastly, fourth group is the people who focus on the quality of the ecotourism program. In case of the second group, though they have negative opinions of the program, they have much interest in successful cases in other countries managed similar programs with Maha ecotourism. It would be effective for the group to have opportunities to experience successful ecotourism cases in other countries. On top of it, having seminars regarding ecotourism or holding community councils frequently would be very helpful for encouraging the second group of people to join in the ecotourism program actively like other groups of people. Supplying more manpower and developing various programs are also necessary in order to support other three groups.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 강미희, "한국형 생태관광지 조성을 위한 10대모델사업 진행평가 연구" 한국관광공사 2010

2 이재혁, "지속가능한 생태관광을 위한 평가지표 개발 및 적용에 관한 연구" 대한지리학회 47 (47): 853-869, 2012

3 윤성윤, "주남저수지의 생태관광에 대한 고찰" 한국습지학회 2 (2): 41-47, 2000

4 배민기, "저탄소 생태관광지표 개발 및 평가" 한국환경정책·평가연구원 2009

5 조중현, "생태관광의 새로운 해석과 비전" 한국관광연구학회 28 (28): 131-144, 2014

6 김사영, "생태관광과 인접유사개념에 관한 연구" (2) : 203-221, 1992

7 최정수, "생태관광과 로컬 거버넌스" 한국경제지리학회 6 (6): 233-247, 2003

8 최희선, "생태관광 지정제 도입을 위한 평가지표 및 체계 개발" 한국환경영향평가학회 21 (21): 185-199, 2012

9 양승필, "생태관광 개발에 대한 지역주민의 인식 영향요인, 지각된 혜택, 개발 지지도, 참여의도간의 관계 연구" 대한관광경영학회 27 (27): 319-339, 2012

10 김재일, "비판적 시각에서 본 생태 관광과 그 대안" 6 : 87-107, 1998

11 야은숙, "민통선지역의 생태관광개발방안 연구" (3) : 171-195, 1993

12 최희선, "국내․외 생태관광 인증/지정제도 동향 및 국내 제도 도입 방안" 한국환경복원기술학회 15 (15): 73-87, 2012

13 Hunt, C. A, "We are Even Poorer, but There is More Work" Texas A&M University 2009

14 Song, U. K, "To Investigate the Introduction of Ecotourism" 4 : 197-208, 2000

15 Kim, S. H, "The Theoretical Characteristics and Research Trends of Ecotourism" (23) : 17-42, 2002

16 Lee, J. H, "Study on the establishing indicator sets for evaluating eco-tourism sustainability and its application" Seoul National University 2010

17 Spenceley, A, "Requirements for sustainable nature-based tourism in transfrontier conservation areas: a southern African Delphi consultation" 10 (10): 285-311, 2008

18 Stergiou, D, "Q-methodology and tourism research" 14 (14): 311-322, 2011

19 이재혁, "Q 방법론을 이용한 예산 황새마을 조성사업의 갈등구조 분석" 한국농촌계획학회 20 (20): 77-87, 2014

20 김흥규, "Q 방법론(과학철학, 이론, 분석 그리고 적용)" 커뮤니케이션북스 2008

21 Cuppen, E, "Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands" 69 (69): 579-591, 2010

22 Kim, S. E, "Q Methods & sociology" Gold Well Publishing Inc 2007

23 Hunter, W. C, "Performing culture at indigenous culture parks in Taiwan: Using Q method to identify the performers' subjectivities" 42 : 294-304, 2014

24 Hunter, W. C, "Performing Culture at the Formosan Aboriginal Culture Village in Taiwan:Exploring Performers' Subjectivities Using Q Method" 15 (15): 403-416, 2013

25 Park, C. M, "Investigation on Resources for Ecotourism around Pyonsanbando National Park (1)" 16 (16): 1-14, 1998

26 Tsaur, S. H, "Evaluating ecotourism sustainability from the integrated perspective of resource, community and tourism" 27 (27): 640-653, 2006

27 Kang, M. H, "Ecotourists' Travel Motivations and Attitudes in Korea : Scales Development and Comparative Analysis on Tourists Groups" Seoul National University 1999

28 Kang, M. H, "Ecotourism certification system" Korea Studies Information 2007

29 Yoo, K. J, "Ecotourism Planning Framework for Korean Rural Communities(2) -A Case Study in Woopo Area, Changryounggun, Korea-]" 12 (12): 163-173, 1999

30 Yoo, K. J., "Ecotourism Planning Framework for Korean Rural Communities(1) -A Case Study in Jeongdori, Wandogun, Korea-," 12 (12): 102-114, 1998

31 Koh, E. K, "Development of Ecotourism Program with Geomorphic Interpretations Using Oreum in Jeju Island of Korea" 10 (10): 195-206, 2003

32 Wight, P, "Critical Issues in Ecotourism" Butterworth-Heinemann 214-239, 2007

33 Gurung, D. B, "Community-based ecotourism in Bhutan: Expert evaluation of stakeholder-based scenarios" 15 (15): 397-411, 2008

34 Graci, S, "Collaboration and partnership development for sustainable tourism" 15 (15): 25-42, 2013

35 García-Melón, M, "A combined ANP-delphi approach to evaluate sustainable tourism" 34 : 41-50, 2012

36 Kim, J. M, "A Study on the Development of Eco-tourism for Tidal Flat of Kanghwa," 17 : 5-25, 2002

37 Lee, G. H, "A Study on the Cooperation Plans of the Ecotourism Development in Community" 12 (12): 225-244, 1999

38 Choi, H. K, "A Study on the Activity of Development for Eco-Tourism Area" 4 (4): 279-295, 1998

39 Kim, H, "A Study on Nature Resource Management System for Ecotourism Practices -The Case of the Iriomote Island in Japan-, J" 5 (5): 64-71, 2002