RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      조경공사 하자에 관한 전문가 집단간 인식분석을 통한 개선방안 연구 = A Study on the Improvement Plan through Analyzing the Perception of Expert Group about Landscape Construction Defects

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101267604

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study aimed to find out the improvement plan through analyzing the perception of the expert group engaged in landscape architectural construction and to focus on analyzing the expert groups' experience on Landscape Construction Defects (LCD), defect liability, warranty period, and implementation of the defect liability. The results are as follows: 1. Regarding the experience on the LCD, landscape construction contractors were an awareness of the LCD issue at a serious level, while public-sector clients recognize moderately the LCD issue; and on the first priority in defect implementation, landscape construction contractors considered repair cost while public-sector clients value the identifying causes of defects. 2. In disagreement on the defect liability, landscape construction contractors attributed it to client's lack of responsibility for maintenance while public-sector clients ascribed it to the absence of dealing a criteria with LCD, and regarding the appropriate defect implementation, public-sector clients preferred the following objective by dealing the criteria with LCD while landscape construction contractors advocates by sharing the responsibilities for dealing with LCD based on the identified causes of construction defects. 3. Regarding the warranty period, the public-sector clients considered the 2-year warranty period as appropriate while landscape construction contractors considered it comparatively long, and concerning the commencement of defect warranty period, the public-sector clients viewed it as it should commence to cover the overall completion of the construction while landscape construction contractors perceived it to start on the completion of each work. 4. As for the improvement of the defect implementation system, public-sector clients considered it necessary to establish the objective dealing the criteria with LCD while landscape construction contractors viewed the legislation of maintenance duty. Also, with regard to the important value in establishing and dealing the criteria with LCD, public-sector clients pointed out the objective of the criteria for determining the defects per work type while landscape construction contractors suggested client (user)'s maintenance duty. Because of research, because the system in dealing with LCD is an absence of LCD management agency and dealing the criteria with LCD, it is needed to establish an LCD management agency and make the system in dealing with LCD.
      번역하기

      This study aimed to find out the improvement plan through analyzing the perception of the expert group engaged in landscape architectural construction and to focus on analyzing the expert groups' experience on Landscape Construction Defects (LCD), def...

      This study aimed to find out the improvement plan through analyzing the perception of the expert group engaged in landscape architectural construction and to focus on analyzing the expert groups' experience on Landscape Construction Defects (LCD), defect liability, warranty period, and implementation of the defect liability. The results are as follows: 1. Regarding the experience on the LCD, landscape construction contractors were an awareness of the LCD issue at a serious level, while public-sector clients recognize moderately the LCD issue; and on the first priority in defect implementation, landscape construction contractors considered repair cost while public-sector clients value the identifying causes of defects. 2. In disagreement on the defect liability, landscape construction contractors attributed it to client's lack of responsibility for maintenance while public-sector clients ascribed it to the absence of dealing a criteria with LCD, and regarding the appropriate defect implementation, public-sector clients preferred the following objective by dealing the criteria with LCD while landscape construction contractors advocates by sharing the responsibilities for dealing with LCD based on the identified causes of construction defects. 3. Regarding the warranty period, the public-sector clients considered the 2-year warranty period as appropriate while landscape construction contractors considered it comparatively long, and concerning the commencement of defect warranty period, the public-sector clients viewed it as it should commence to cover the overall completion of the construction while landscape construction contractors perceived it to start on the completion of each work. 4. As for the improvement of the defect implementation system, public-sector clients considered it necessary to establish the objective dealing the criteria with LCD while landscape construction contractors viewed the legislation of maintenance duty. Also, with regard to the important value in establishing and dealing the criteria with LCD, public-sector clients pointed out the objective of the criteria for determining the defects per work type while landscape construction contractors suggested client (user)'s maintenance duty. Because of research, because the system in dealing with LCD is an absence of LCD management agency and dealing the criteria with LCD, it is needed to establish an LCD management agency and make the system in dealing with LCD.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "환경과 조경"

      2 김혜진, "해안 매립지 조경수목 하자분석 연구 : 인천 송도지구 공원·녹지 조성공사 사례를 중심으로" 한양대학교 공학대학원 2008

      3 김옥규, "주택하자분쟁의 현황과 문제점" 11 (11): 5-8, 2010

      4 신훈, "조경용 목재시설물의 목재 종류별 하자 분석 : 휴게시설물 기둥재의 품질 하자를 중심으로" 호남대학교 대학원 2011

      5 임지택, "조경시설물의 품질보증 방안에 관한 연구 : 조경시설물 하자발생 사례를 중심으로" 한양대학교 공학대학원 2009

      6 김양희, "조경수목 하자현황 및 개선방안 : 서울시 아파트 식재공사를 중심으로" 고려대학교 생명환경과학대학원 2006

      7 천해성, "조경수목 하자에 관한 연구" 경북대학교 농업개발대학원 2000

      8 한권영, "조경 목재시설물의 갈라짐 실태 및 하자 저감방안 : 조경현장의 파고라, 정자 기둥재를 중심으로" 한경대학교 산업대학원 2008

      9 박승인, "옥상조경 하자에 관한 연구 : 서울특별시 공공건물 사례를 중심으로" 한양대학교 공학대학원 2009

      10 임원현, "아파트단지 조경수목의 식재하자에 관한 연구" 29 (29): 61-67, 2001

      11 강호철, "아파트 단지 조경식재 공사의 하자에 관한 연구" 한양대학교 환경과학대학원 1984

      12 최정현, "공동주택 하자분쟁의 법률적 쟁점사항 분석" 대한건축학회 25 (25): 145-153, 2009

      13 박준모, "공동주택 하자분쟁 조정제도의 활성화 방안 - 기술적 쟁점사항에 대한 대응전략을 중심으로 -" 한국건축시공학회 11 (11): 208-220, 2011

      14 박근수, "공동주택 하자담보책임기간의 조정을 위한 공종별 검토방법에 관한 연구" 2008

      15 허성회, "공동주택 콘크리트 균열의 미관상 하자 판정기준에 관한 연구" 대한건축학회 26 (26): 103-112, 2010

      16 안용선, "공동주택 건축공사의 하자유형과 대책에 관한 연구" 6 (6): 85-92, 2004

      17 조유경, "경관제어요소에 관한 전문가집단 간 인식차이 분석" 한국조경학회 39 (39): 29-39, 2011

      18 최민수, "건설공사 하자담보책임의 개선방안" 7 : 52-61, 1998

      19 정충영, "SPSSWIN을 이용한 통계분석 3판" 무역경영사 1999

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-05-20 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2000-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.74 0.74 0.78
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.76 0.74 1.022 0.14
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼