우리나라의 환경분쟁 조정제도에 대한 고찰

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Environmental dispute has such special characteristics as difficulties of peculiarity of the inflicter and inflicting act, proving casuality between inflicting act and damage, monetary evaluation that damages, value dispute and communitys decision making, for that reason, so there is a definite limit of settling by an agreement or court action between dispute parties called a traditional dispute solution, thus it is necessary to actively seek for a solution through an extrajudicial dispute solution (ADR). The environmental dispute mediation system in this country has been assessed as contributing much to set시 the environmental disputes in our society since it was introduced. Especially, in terms of quick resolution of a dispute, reduction of expenses and time, enhancement of specialization, and proof of damaged fact, it is more favorable than that by lawsuit. Nevertheless, current environmental dispute mediation system exposes its many problems, which for example, represent operation focusing on award in regard with a dispute demanding compensation for damage due to construction noise, vibration, if sunshine disturbance is the subject of environmental dispute mediation, security of independence and specialization of environmental dispute mediation committee and security problem of executive ability to mediation result etc. Thus it is necessary to make more efforts to discuss more and build up an institutional device to solve these problems in the future.
Based on this discussion, chapter 2 of this paper explores environmental dispute solution dividing into dispute solution by anaction and that by an extrajudicial solution and describes foreign dispute solutions. Chapter 3 makes a general survey of this countrys environmental dispute mediation system focusing current law. Chapter 4 explores the current operation condition of environmental dispute mediation system, divides related cases to award and medication cases and analyze them. Final chapter discusses the legal problem and improvement scheme of current environmental dispute mediation system based on the contents considered at the former chapters.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김연태, "환경행정에 있어서 비공식적 행정작용으로서의 협상" 23 (23): 1995

2 김상수, "환경분쟁해결을 위한 재판과 ADR의 역할 분담" 한국환경법학회 28 (28): 105-131, 2006

3 홍준형, "환경분쟁조정제도의 실효성 및 실효성 제고방안에 대한 고찰" 한국환경법학회 28 (28): 135-165, 2006

4 박태현, "환경분쟁조정제도의 선진화를 위한 법적 과제" 한국환경법학회 30 (30): 161-183, 2008

5 서원우, "환경분쟁조정제도의 개발에 관한 연구" 7 : 1985

6 이현준, "환경분쟁조정제도에 관한 일고찰" 한국토지공법학회 30 : 395-410, 2006

7 김세규, "환경분쟁조정제도에 관한 연구" 24 (24): 2003

8 중앙환경분쟁조정위원회, "환경분쟁조정제도 해설"

9 중앙환경분쟁조정위원회, "환경분쟁조정사례집" 2003

10 김형진, "환경분쟁조정법의 제문제" 50 (50): 2001

11 이수영, "환경분쟁조정론" 경인문화사 2001

12 "환경분쟁조정 기능 강화 등 중장기 발전 방향연구" 중앙환경분쟁조정위원회 2006

13 나성린, "환경분쟁의 경제적 해결방안 모색" 1996

14 강정혜, "환경분쟁위원회의 구성 및 조정절차의 개선방안" 한국환경법학회 28 (28): 81-99, 2006

15 이상규, "환경법론" 1998

16 조현권, "환경법-이론과 실무" 법률문화원 1999

17 류지태, "환경법" 고려대학교출판부 2000

18 김홍균, "환경법" 홍문사 2012

19 이순자, "환경법" 법원사 2012

20 이희정, "환경 분쟁의 발생 배경, 유형, 그리고 대책- 환경분쟁조정제도의 기능 강화 관점에서 -" 한국환경법학회 28 (28): 3-44, 2006

21 "헌법재판소 1995.5.25. 선고 91헌가7결정"

22 조홍식, "판례환경법" 박영사 2012

23 "창원지방법원 2006. 11. 2. 선고 2006구합1225 판결"

24 이점인, "재판외 분쟁해결제도 -ADR을 중심으로" 1999

25 "수원지방법원 2005구합4596 판결"

26 "부산고등법원 2007. 6. 29. 선고 2006누5540 판결"

27 사득환, "민선시대의 환경갈등과 정책조정" 8 (8): 1999

28 김홍균, "국제환경법" 홍문사 2010

29 김유환, "行政事件에 대한 裁判外紛爭解決制度" 법학연구소 6 (6): 75-108, 2001

30 전경운, "環境分爭調整制度의 현황과 문제점" 한국환경법학회 26 (26): 219-242, 2004

31 조홍식, "代案的 紛爭解決制度(ADR)의 經濟學― 環境紛爭調停制度에 대한 評價를 中心으로 ―" 법학연구소 47 (47): 13-75, 2006

32 중앙환경분쟁조정위원회, "2007년도 국정감사 환경노동위원회 업무보고"