주식의 공개매수의 활성화를 위한 공개매수가격의 검토 = Review on Takeover Price for Takeover Activation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Share`s takeover is the legitimate method that buy the desiring amount by the fixed price for the definite duration for the purpose of the acquisition and strengthening of corporate management right. But in this takeover, if shareholders decided the selling of the share on the condition of having no sufficient informations hurriedly, as the result, the controlling share can show up in the acquisition corporate of share and the remaining share can get into danger to be minority shareholder. Of course, for the prevention of this risk. our corporate law have the prevention systems. 91) Anyway, whatever in the purpose of the corporate takeover, the success of the takeover is bound up with the takeover price. However, by the current capital market law, we can understand the fact that it have several provisions and can not solve the related problems. Therefore, I will study in the following points. Firstly, I will exercise the present condition of the takeover market and the related legal system in our country. Secondly, I will compare with the our legal system and foreign legal system. Lastly, I will search for solving method and improvement method on the purpose of the activation of the takeover market. As the result, I will think over the following facts. Firstly, the takeover price must be equal and fair. secondly, the takeover buyer must disclose the methods that calculate on the takeover price for the shareholders` understanding. Thirdly, we must revise the current capital market law and related sub-codes. I will think that if we achieve the above mentioned the facts, the takeover market be promote definitely.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 証券法硏究会, "金融法大系Ⅰ 公開買付け(2)" 商事法務研究会 2012

2 한국은행, "해외경제포커스"

3 김건식, "자본시장법" 박영사 2010

4 김우찬, "영국의 의무공개매수제도와 이사회중립" ERRI경제개혁연구소 2010

5 정우용, "상장기업에 대한 M&A위협과 경영권 방어" 한국 IR협의회 2015

6 강원철, "공개매수 현황 분석" 자본시장연구원 1-7, 2014

7 금융감독원, "공개매수 신고 의무 위반 법인에 대한 조치"

8 노혁준, "경영권 이전에 관한 몇 가지 쟁점: 공개매수에 관한 EU의 제13지침과 그 시사점" 법학연구소 48 (48): 260-313, 2007

9 松尾直彦, "金融商品取引法" 商事法務 2011

10 高橋美穂子, "株式公開買付の実務と制度改正後の傾向" 高崎経済大学地域政策学会 16 (16): 2014

11 池田唯一, "新しい公開買付制度と大量保有報告制度" 商事法務硏究會 2007

12 石井禎, "実踐TOBハンドック" 日経BP社 2007

13 公益財団法人 日本証券経済研究所 金融商品取引法研究会, "公開買付規制を巡る近時の諸問題" (35) : 2011

14 石塚洋之, "公開買付けの条件に関する規制（上）" 商事法 務研究会 (1848) : 2008

15 青木茂男, "「証券市場における株式価値評価」― 公開買付届出書にみる状況 ―" 茨城キリスト教大学 (48) : 2014

16 Michael A. Akiva, "during the Tender Offer or Some Time Around It : Helping Courts Interpret the Best-Price Rule" 353 : 375-376, 2006

17 Jim Mallea, "Timing to Close-Tender Offers vs. Mergers"

18 James D. Cox Et Al., "Securities Regulation, Cases and Materials 1007"

19 Emmanuel U. Obi, "SEC Rule 14d-10(e) Amendment : Is this the Optimal Solution to the Tender Offer :Best-Price Rule Dilemma?" 35 (35): 2007

20 송종준, "M&A법제의 현황과 보완과제" 한국상장회사협의회 2005

21 김두식, "M&A법제의 개선방안 연구" 한국상장회사협의회 (50) : 2004

22 "Katt v. Titan Acquisition, 244 F. supp. 2d, 841"

23 Marco Ventoruzzo, "Europe’s Thirteenth Directive and U.S. Takeover Regulation: Regulatory eans and Political and Economic Ends" 41 : 199-, 2006

24 Ben Walther, "Employment Agreements and Tender Offers : Reforming the Problematic Treatment of Severance Plans Under Rule 14D-10" 102 : 774-777, 2002

25 Joy Dey, "Efficiency of Takeover Defence Regulations - A Critical Analysis of the Takeover defence Regimes in Delaware and the U.K"

26 Michael D. Ebert, "During the Tender Offer(or Some Time Near IT): Insider Transactional under the All Holders/Best Price Rule" 47 : 677-688, 2002

27 Beverly L, "Annotation, Construction fo “Best-price rule” of William Act amendment(§14(d)(7) to Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C.A. §78(d)(7) requiring makers of tender offer to offer best price to all securities holders" 100 : 444-, 1990

28 이민형, "2014년 상장사 공개매수 신고 현황과 목적별 세부 현황 분석" 한국지배구조원 5 (5): 2015