RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      조선전기 통신사의 개념과 성격

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82506652

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The aim of this study is to analyze the conception and characteristics of Tongshinsa(通信使) in the early Chosun period. First, 'Tongshinsa', or 'Shinsa', was created as a delegation dispatched from Chosun to nother countries. This relationship called Kyorin(交隣) during the early Chosun period. Later, Tongshinsa was only dispatched to Edobakuhu(江戶幕府), Japan. During the early Chosun period, the Chosun Gukwangsa(朝鮮國王使) tried to dispatch twenty-four times, but only went to Kyoto(京都), Japan nineteen times. This envoy had several names: Tongshingwan(通信官), Hyeresa(回禮使), Hyeregwan(回禮官), Chogwan(朝官). However, the names of these envoys were used differently, according to changes in Chosun´s diplomatic policy toward Japan. Later, the name of Tongshinsa was chosen. The dispatch of Chosun Gukwangsa is divided by four periods. The envoys of the first period had been dispatched for the purpose of Bobing(報聘) and Hyere(回禮), These envoys showed appreciation, courtesy, and gratitude for the repression of Waegu(倭寇) and the return of Korean prisoners who were captured. The names of the envoys were Hyeresa(回禮使), Hyeregwan (回禮官), and Chogwan(朝官). The Second period of Chosun Gukwangsa was called Tongshinsa. The purpose of this period of displomacy was the celebration of the new Shogun(將軍) and to show condolence for the passing of the old Shogun(將軍). The third period envoy was called Thongshinsa, and was sent to observe Japan's domestic atmosphere. Although the envoys of the fourth period were also named Tongshinsa, at that time it had very different characteristics from the original envoy. During the early Chosun period, Tongshinsa did not have standard rules and regulations to reach an agreement between Chosun and Japan, unlike the later Chosun period. Ashikaga Bakuho(足利幕府) didn't ask Tongshinsa to come nor inform the Chosun Dynasty about the death of the old Shogun. Despite this, the reasons why the Chosun government dispatched Tonshinsa were creating a foreign policy emphasizing the relationship of Kyorin (交隣) with neighboring countries; preventing the expansion of problems related to Waegu(倭寇) and ensuring security by creating a path for negotiation to solve pending issues between Chosun and Japan. Secondly, unlike the later Chosun period, all costs for the detachment of Tongshinsa were paid for by the Chosun government. Thirdly, Tongshinsa in the early Chosun period had political and diplomatic exchanges between Chosun and many Daimyo(大名), or regional leaders, including Bakuhu. Later, Chosun diplomacy only focused on Bakuhu, this point are very important characteristics of the early Chosun period. Eventually, the Chosun government was disappointed by the rude diplomatic attitudes of Ashikaga Bakuhu and the weakness of Japan's central government. During the early Chosun Dynasty, the Chosun government had lost its influence with Japan. After that, the Chosun government stopped dispatching Tongshinsa.

      번역하기

      The aim of this study is to analyze the conception and characteristics of Tongshinsa(通信使) in the early Chosun period. First, 'Tongshinsa', or 'Shinsa', was created as a delegation dispatched from Chosun to nother countries. This relationship cal...

      The aim of this study is to analyze the conception and characteristics of Tongshinsa(通信使) in the early Chosun period. First, 'Tongshinsa', or 'Shinsa', was created as a delegation dispatched from Chosun to nother countries. This relationship called Kyorin(交隣) during the early Chosun period. Later, Tongshinsa was only dispatched to Edobakuhu(江戶幕府), Japan. During the early Chosun period, the Chosun Gukwangsa(朝鮮國王使) tried to dispatch twenty-four times, but only went to Kyoto(京都), Japan nineteen times. This envoy had several names: Tongshingwan(通信官), Hyeresa(回禮使), Hyeregwan(回禮官), Chogwan(朝官). However, the names of these envoys were used differently, according to changes in Chosun´s diplomatic policy toward Japan. Later, the name of Tongshinsa was chosen. The dispatch of Chosun Gukwangsa is divided by four periods. The envoys of the first period had been dispatched for the purpose of Bobing(報聘) and Hyere(回禮), These envoys showed appreciation, courtesy, and gratitude for the repression of Waegu(倭寇) and the return of Korean prisoners who were captured. The names of the envoys were Hyeresa(回禮使), Hyeregwan (回禮官), and Chogwan(朝官). The Second period of Chosun Gukwangsa was called Tongshinsa. The purpose of this period of displomacy was the celebration of the new Shogun(將軍) and to show condolence for the passing of the old Shogun(將軍). The third period envoy was called Thongshinsa, and was sent to observe Japan's domestic atmosphere. Although the envoys of the fourth period were also named Tongshinsa, at that time it had very different characteristics from the original envoy. During the early Chosun period, Tongshinsa did not have standard rules and regulations to reach an agreement between Chosun and Japan, unlike the later Chosun period. Ashikaga Bakuho(足利幕府) didn't ask Tongshinsa to come nor inform the Chosun Dynasty about the death of the old Shogun. Despite this, the reasons why the Chosun government dispatched Tonshinsa were creating a foreign policy emphasizing the relationship of Kyorin (交隣) with neighboring countries; preventing the expansion of problems related to Waegu(倭寇) and ensuring security by creating a path for negotiation to solve pending issues between Chosun and Japan. Secondly, unlike the later Chosun period, all costs for the detachment of Tongshinsa were paid for by the Chosun government. Thirdly, Tongshinsa in the early Chosun period had political and diplomatic exchanges between Chosun and many Daimyo(大名), or regional leaders, including Bakuhu. Later, Chosun diplomacy only focused on Bakuhu, this point are very important characteristics of the early Chosun period. Eventually, the Chosun government was disappointed by the rude diplomatic attitudes of Ashikaga Bakuhu and the weakness of Japan's central government. During the early Chosun Dynasty, the Chosun government had lost its influence with Japan. After that, the Chosun government stopped dispatching Tongshinsa.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 통신사의 개념
      • Ⅲ. 조선국왕사 파견실태와 통신사 정비 과정
      • Ⅳ. 조선전기 통신사의 성격
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 통신사의 개념
      • Ⅲ. 조선국왕사 파견실태와 통신사 정비 과정
      • Ⅳ. 조선전기 통신사의 성격
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      • <참고문헌>
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 손승철, "통신사의 시작문제와 연구현황" 2009

      2 한문종, "조선전기 대일외교정채 연구" 전북대학교 대학원 1996

      3 민덕기, "조선시대 일본의 대외교섭" 경인문화사 2010

      4 손승철, "조선시대 ‘통신사’ 개념의 재검토" 조선시대사학회 27 (27): 5-32, 2003

      5 민덕기, "전근대 동아시아 세계의 한·일관계" 경인문화사 2007

      6 손승철, "근세한일관계사" 강원대학교 출판부 1987

      7 三宅英利, "근세한일관계사연구. in: 이론과 실천" 1991

      8 "高麗史節要"

      9 "朝鮮王朝實錄"

      10 "春官志"

      1 손승철, "통신사의 시작문제와 연구현황" 2009

      2 한문종, "조선전기 대일외교정채 연구" 전북대학교 대학원 1996

      3 민덕기, "조선시대 일본의 대외교섭" 경인문화사 2010

      4 손승철, "조선시대 ‘통신사’ 개념의 재검토" 조선시대사학회 27 (27): 5-32, 2003

      5 민덕기, "전근대 동아시아 세계의 한·일관계" 경인문화사 2007

      6 손승철, "근세한일관계사" 강원대학교 출판부 1987

      7 三宅英利, "근세한일관계사연구. in: 이론과 실천" 1991

      8 "高麗史節要"

      9 "朝鮮王朝實錄"

      10 "春官志"

      11 中村榮孝, "日本と朝鮮" 至文堂 1966

      12 김문자, "島井宗室과 1590년 통신시 파견문제에 대해서" 상명사학회 2 : 1994

      13 "增正交隣志"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.4 0.4 0.49
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.45 0.43 1.181 0.14
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼