RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Contrasting Concepts of Time and Process  :  (Contemporary Implications)

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=E806680

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      It is proposed to examine in this paper selected implications of contrasting concepts of time and process, and to suggest that such concepts are central to the nature of that larger realm of what is called a peoples´ world-view. It is suggested that such an approach may be one way to address, and hopefully to clarify, certain dimensions of those current and tragic problems of polarizations across and within the multiple segments of the world´s populations. Examples of accelerating tensions and violence in this situation are all too evident in the contemporary proliferation of ideological revolutions, social, economic and political disruptions, all more or less interrelated with inevitable energy crises as nations vie for control over the world´s material resources that they may continue to build a world of diminishing returns upon the fragile and illusory foundation of the nonrenewable.
      We are all familiar with those self-serving classification systems by which segments of humanity are identified according to First, Second, and Third worlds, now extended to Fourth and Fifth worlds due to the increasing complexities of our current global situation, We are also familiar with associated descriptive terms of less formal language; “developing”, “emerging”, “backward”, or non-literate/primitive, Suspicions are thus aroused that our labels and modes of classification do not just describe objective existential situations based, as we are informed, on the objective criteria of scientific and technological sophistication, possession and/or access to material natural resources, and quality or type of political system. What is actually projected, rather, are idiosyncratic value judgments, not to say latent prejudices, imposed upon world populations by the First or perhaps Second world proponents of such ranking systems.
      번역하기

      It is proposed to examine in this paper selected implications of contrasting concepts of time and process, and to suggest that such concepts are central to the nature of that larger realm of what is called a peoples´ world-view. It is suggested that ...

      It is proposed to examine in this paper selected implications of contrasting concepts of time and process, and to suggest that such concepts are central to the nature of that larger realm of what is called a peoples´ world-view. It is suggested that such an approach may be one way to address, and hopefully to clarify, certain dimensions of those current and tragic problems of polarizations across and within the multiple segments of the world´s populations. Examples of accelerating tensions and violence in this situation are all too evident in the contemporary proliferation of ideological revolutions, social, economic and political disruptions, all more or less interrelated with inevitable energy crises as nations vie for control over the world´s material resources that they may continue to build a world of diminishing returns upon the fragile and illusory foundation of the nonrenewable.
      We are all familiar with those self-serving classification systems by which segments of humanity are identified according to First, Second, and Third worlds, now extended to Fourth and Fifth worlds due to the increasing complexities of our current global situation, We are also familiar with associated descriptive terms of less formal language; “developing”, “emerging”, “backward”, or non-literate/primitive, Suspicions are thus aroused that our labels and modes of classification do not just describe objective existential situations based, as we are informed, on the objective criteria of scientific and technological sophistication, possession and/or access to material natural resources, and quality or type of political system. What is actually projected, rather, are idiosyncratic value judgments, not to say latent prejudices, imposed upon world populations by the First or perhaps Second world proponents of such ranking systems.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼