The first record of the life of Nogye Park In-ro was made by Jeong Gyu-yang(정규양) in 1704, and the text is also found in the manuscript and woodblock versions of Nogyejip(노계집). A comparison of the three texts, however, unexpectedly reveals ...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101913230
2016
-
810
KCI등재
학술저널
157-184(28쪽)
3
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The first record of the life of Nogye Park In-ro was made by Jeong Gyu-yang(정규양) in 1704, and the text is also found in the manuscript and woodblock versions of Nogyejip(노계집). A comparison of the three texts, however, unexpectedly reveals ...
The first record of the life of Nogye Park In-ro was made by Jeong Gyu-yang(정규양) in 1704, and the text is also found in the manuscript and woodblock versions of Nogyejip(노계집). A comparison of the three texts, however, unexpectedly reveals small and big differences at 85 places. Some of them derive from the correction of Jeong's errors in the manuscript or woodblock version, and others are due to the errors made in the publication process of manuscript or woodblock version based on Jeong's text. Those errors were not intended, but there were
as many as 13 intentional modifications of Jeong's text in the publication process of manuscript or woodblock version.
There were very diverse reasons for those modifications, but they were usually made to sublimate Nogye as a holier figure or more thorough Confucian scholar and take the positions of his family into consideration. The parts depicting his literature intensively, in particular, show a serious degree of modifications including the rearrangement of sentence orders and the skillful distortion of content. Those modifications were also part of the intentional groundwork to highlight the Confucian utility of his poetry and prose and his aspects as a member of solemn nobility. There is no need to say, however, that those modifications ended up distorting the overall image of his literature considerably and presenting it even farther from its actual truth.
When those findings were put together, Nogyebakgongyusa(노계박공유사) is undoubtedly the legitimate sample of the three texts on his life, which means that the practice should now stop which has discussed his life based on his
acts described in the woodblock version. Nogyebakgongyusa also contains some errors regarding factual relations, though. The investigator thus attached the original version with the errors corrected to the appendix.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 김문기, "蘆溪集古寫本의고찰" 경북대동양문화연구소 7 : 1980
2 鄭葵陽, "蘆溪朴公遺事, 壎篪兩先生文集 제 30권"
3 이종문, "蘆溪 朴仁老 文學의 創作 空間과 遺蹟 關聯 몇 가지 探索" 대동한문학회 (구.교남한문학회) (29) : 179-216, 2008
4 장인진, "영남문집의 출판과 문헌학적 양상" 계명대학교출판부 2011
5 朴仁老, "목판본 노계집"
6 김창규, "노계시의 재조명" 박이정 2012
7 朴仁老, "노계시문학원전자료집성 수록" 박이정 2006
8 "禮記"
9 김석배, "庚午本蘆溪家集" 구미문화원 2006
10 "孟子"
1 김문기, "蘆溪集古寫本의고찰" 경북대동양문화연구소 7 : 1980
2 鄭葵陽, "蘆溪朴公遺事, 壎篪兩先生文集 제 30권"
3 이종문, "蘆溪 朴仁老 文學의 創作 空間과 遺蹟 關聯 몇 가지 探索" 대동한문학회 (구.교남한문학회) (29) : 179-216, 2008
4 장인진, "영남문집의 출판과 문헌학적 양상" 계명대학교출판부 2011
5 朴仁老, "목판본 노계집"
6 김창규, "노계시의 재조명" 박이정 2012
7 朴仁老, "노계시문학원전자료집성 수록" 박이정 2006
8 "禮記"
9 김석배, "庚午本蘆溪家集" 구미문화원 2006
10 "孟子"
조선시대 한글 편지에 나타난 ‘싶-' 구문의 사적 변화 일고찰
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2028 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2022-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2019-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2016-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2015-12-01 | 등재 | 등재후보로 하락 (기타) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2002-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 1999-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.28 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.3 | 0.32 | 0.556 | 0.11 |