RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    蘆溪朴仁老行狀의 變改사실에 關한 考察 = A Study on the Modifications to the Biography of Nogye(노계) Park In-Ro(박인로)

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101913230

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The first record of the life of Nogye Park In-ro was made by Jeong Gyu-yang(정규양) in 1704, and the text is also found in the manuscript and woodblock versions of Nogyejip(노계집). A comparison of the three texts, however, unexpectedly reveals small and big differences at 85 places. Some of them derive from the correction of Jeong's errors in the manuscript or woodblock version, and others are due to the errors made in the publication process of manuscript or woodblock version based on Jeong's text. Those errors were not intended, but there were
    as many as 13 intentional modifications of Jeong's text in the publication process of manuscript or woodblock version.
    There were very diverse reasons for those modifications, but they were usually made to sublimate Nogye as a holier figure or more thorough Confucian scholar and take the positions of his family into consideration. The parts depicting his literature intensively, in particular, show a serious degree of modifications including the rearrangement of sentence orders and the skillful distortion of content. Those modifications were also part of the intentional groundwork to highlight the Confucian utility of his poetry and prose and his aspects as a member of solemn nobility. There is no need to say, however, that those modifications ended up distorting the overall image of his literature considerably and presenting it even farther from its actual truth.
    When those findings were put together, Nogyebakgongyusa(노계박공유사) is undoubtedly the legitimate sample of the three texts on his life, which means that the practice should now stop which has discussed his life based on his
    acts described in the woodblock version. Nogyebakgongyusa also contains some errors regarding factual relations, though. The investigator thus attached the original version with the errors corrected to the appendix.
    번역하기

    The first record of the life of Nogye Park In-ro was made by Jeong Gyu-yang(정규양) in 1704, and the text is also found in the manuscript and woodblock versions of Nogyejip(노계집). A comparison of the three texts, however, unexpectedly reveals ...

    The first record of the life of Nogye Park In-ro was made by Jeong Gyu-yang(정규양) in 1704, and the text is also found in the manuscript and woodblock versions of Nogyejip(노계집). A comparison of the three texts, however, unexpectedly reveals small and big differences at 85 places. Some of them derive from the correction of Jeong's errors in the manuscript or woodblock version, and others are due to the errors made in the publication process of manuscript or woodblock version based on Jeong's text. Those errors were not intended, but there were
    as many as 13 intentional modifications of Jeong's text in the publication process of manuscript or woodblock version.
    There were very diverse reasons for those modifications, but they were usually made to sublimate Nogye as a holier figure or more thorough Confucian scholar and take the positions of his family into consideration. The parts depicting his literature intensively, in particular, show a serious degree of modifications including the rearrangement of sentence orders and the skillful distortion of content. Those modifications were also part of the intentional groundwork to highlight the Confucian utility of his poetry and prose and his aspects as a member of solemn nobility. There is no need to say, however, that those modifications ended up distorting the overall image of his literature considerably and presenting it even farther from its actual truth.
    When those findings were put together, Nogyebakgongyusa(노계박공유사) is undoubtedly the legitimate sample of the three texts on his life, which means that the practice should now stop which has discussed his life based on his
    acts described in the woodblock version. Nogyebakgongyusa also contains some errors regarding factual relations, though. The investigator thus attached the original version with the errors corrected to the appendix.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 머리말
    • 2. 노계 행장의 변개 상황과 그 이유
    • 1) 노계박공유사 의 오류를 고친 경우
    • 2) 필사본, 목판본이오류를범한경우.
    • 3) 노계박공유사 내용의의도적변개
    • 1. 머리말
    • 2. 노계 행장의 변개 상황과 그 이유
    • 1) 노계박공유사 의 오류를 고친 경우
    • 2) 필사본, 목판본이오류를범한경우.
    • 3) 노계박공유사 내용의의도적변개
    • 3. 맺음말
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김문기, "蘆溪集古寫本의고찰" 경북대동양문화연구소 7 : 1980

    2 鄭葵陽, "蘆溪朴公遺事, 壎篪兩先生文集 제 30권"

    3 이종문, "蘆溪 朴仁老 文學의 創作 空間과 遺蹟 關聯 몇 가지 探索" 대동한문학회 (구.교남한문학회) (29) : 179-216, 2008

    4 장인진, "영남문집의 출판과 문헌학적 양상" 계명대학교출판부 2011

    5 朴仁老, "목판본 노계집"

    6 김창규, "노계시의 재조명" 박이정 2012

    7 朴仁老, "노계시문학원전자료집성 수록" 박이정 2006

    8 "禮記"

    9 김석배, "庚午本蘆溪家集" 구미문화원 2006

    10 "孟子"

    1 김문기, "蘆溪集古寫本의고찰" 경북대동양문화연구소 7 : 1980

    2 鄭葵陽, "蘆溪朴公遺事, 壎篪兩先生文集 제 30권"

    3 이종문, "蘆溪 朴仁老 文學의 創作 空間과 遺蹟 關聯 몇 가지 探索" 대동한문학회 (구.교남한문학회) (29) : 179-216, 2008

    4 장인진, "영남문집의 출판과 문헌학적 양상" 계명대학교출판부 2011

    5 朴仁老, "목판본 노계집"

    6 김창규, "노계시의 재조명" 박이정 2012

    7 朴仁老, "노계시문학원전자료집성 수록" 박이정 2006

    8 "禮記"

    9 김석배, "庚午本蘆溪家集" 구미문화원 2006

    10 "孟子"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.31 0.31 0.28
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.3 0.32 0.556 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼