RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    은행법상 은행업무의 기능에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Function of the Business of Banking in Banking Act

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Banking Act requires those who wish to run the banking business to obtain government charter and strictly prohibits unauthorized banking operations. However, the meaning of the banking business, which requires approval, and the scope of work subject to specific approval, are not clear, leaving much room for confusion. It is not easy to recognize these problems because Banking Act explicitly define the concept of “banking”. However, the recent dispute between the U.S. OCC and the state of New York over the chartering of banks for FinTech has given important implications for the enforcement of domestic Banking Act.
    The concept of banking business should be operated in close connection with its accreditation system, and this uncertainty in banking business is greatly undermining the functions intended by this legislation. The concept of banking can be largely divided into functions that restrict banks' work and functions that restrict unauthorized entry into the banking industry. Due to the recent changes, however, in the financial industry and the insufficiency of the domestic legal system, there have been cases in which unauthorized individuals actually operate a part of banking business and there are more and more examples which are operated by legally authorized banks but actually by unauthorized entity in terms of external appearance and economic substance. In some cases, there is much room for interpreting the bank's unique business, which is subject to approval, as being able to be run without obtaining approval.
    Rather than suggesting direct improvements in the overall legal system regarding these issues, this article suggests some implications that need to be reflected in policymaking, such as improving regulations on the definition of the banking business, subdividing the banking business chartering system, and considering the enactment of the Integrated Banking Act.
    번역하기

    The Banking Act requires those who wish to run the banking business to obtain government charter and strictly prohibits unauthorized banking operations. However, the meaning of the banking business, which requires approval, and the scope of work subje...

    The Banking Act requires those who wish to run the banking business to obtain government charter and strictly prohibits unauthorized banking operations. However, the meaning of the banking business, which requires approval, and the scope of work subject to specific approval, are not clear, leaving much room for confusion. It is not easy to recognize these problems because Banking Act explicitly define the concept of “banking”. However, the recent dispute between the U.S. OCC and the state of New York over the chartering of banks for FinTech has given important implications for the enforcement of domestic Banking Act.
    The concept of banking business should be operated in close connection with its accreditation system, and this uncertainty in banking business is greatly undermining the functions intended by this legislation. The concept of banking can be largely divided into functions that restrict banks' work and functions that restrict unauthorized entry into the banking industry. Due to the recent changes, however, in the financial industry and the insufficiency of the domestic legal system, there have been cases in which unauthorized individuals actually operate a part of banking business and there are more and more examples which are operated by legally authorized banks but actually by unauthorized entity in terms of external appearance and economic substance. In some cases, there is much room for interpreting the bank's unique business, which is subject to approval, as being able to be run without obtaining approval.
    Rather than suggesting direct improvements in the overall legal system regarding these issues, this article suggests some implications that need to be reflected in policymaking, such as improving regulations on the definition of the banking business, subdividing the banking business chartering system, and considering the enactment of the Integrated Banking Act.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김용재, "은행의 업무규제 분석 및 미국법을 모델로 한 향후 개정방향" 한국증권법학회 13 (13): 265-304, 2012

    2 고동원, "은행의 업무 범위에 관한 법적 연구" 은행법학회 11 (11): 27-71, 2018

    3 도제문, "은행의 겸업제도와 그 업무범위를 정하는 법령 등에 관한 검토" 45 : 2005

    4 최영주, "은행법상 은산분리 법제와 정책에 관한 검토" 법학연구소 (65) : 435-470, 2014

    5 도제문, "은행법강의 : Lecture on banking law" 박영사 2015

    6 최성현, "여신실무법률" 한국금융연수원 2015

    7 최성현, "여신실무법률" 한국금융연수원 2015

    8 금융위원회, "금융혁신 추진방향, 2018.1.15(2018. 1.15 금융위원회 보도자료: 최종구 금융위원장, 「금융혁신 추진방향」 발표 [첨부2])"

    9 이병윤, "금융자본과 산업자본 분리의 논리" (16) : 2006

    10 정순섭, "금융규제체계개편론 - 은행의 업무범위에 대한 국제적 논의를 중심으로 -" 한국상사판례학회 24 (24): 239-301, 2011

    1 김용재, "은행의 업무규제 분석 및 미국법을 모델로 한 향후 개정방향" 한국증권법학회 13 (13): 265-304, 2012

    2 고동원, "은행의 업무 범위에 관한 법적 연구" 은행법학회 11 (11): 27-71, 2018

    3 도제문, "은행의 겸업제도와 그 업무범위를 정하는 법령 등에 관한 검토" 45 : 2005

    4 최영주, "은행법상 은산분리 법제와 정책에 관한 검토" 법학연구소 (65) : 435-470, 2014

    5 도제문, "은행법강의 : Lecture on banking law" 박영사 2015

    6 최성현, "여신실무법률" 한국금융연수원 2015

    7 최성현, "여신실무법률" 한국금융연수원 2015

    8 금융위원회, "금융혁신 추진방향, 2018.1.15(2018. 1.15 금융위원회 보도자료: 최종구 금융위원장, 「금융혁신 추진방향」 발표 [첨부2])"

    9 이병윤, "금융자본과 산업자본 분리의 논리" (16) : 2006

    10 정순섭, "금융규제체계개편론 - 은행의 업무범위에 대한 국제적 논의를 중심으로 -" 한국상사판례학회 24 (24): 239-301, 2011

    11 윤창현, "금산분리제도의 현황과 과제:금산분리완화를 중심으로" (104) : 2008

    12 Edward L. Symons, Jr, "The “Business of Banking” in Historical Perspective" 51 : 676-, 1983

    13 Harfield, "Sermon on Genesis 17:20; Exodus 1:10 (A Proposal for Testing the Propriety of Expanding Bank Services)" 85 : 565-, 1968

    14 OCC, "Policy Statement on Financial Technology Companies’ Eligibility to Apply for National Bank Charters" 2018

    15 OCC, "Licensing Manual Supplement: Considering Charter Applications from Financial Technology Companies" 2018

    16 OCC, "Exploring Special Purpose National Bank Charters for Fintech Companies" 2016

    17 Elizabeth J. Upton, "CHARTERING FINTECH: THE OCC'S NEWEST NONBANK PROPOSAL" 86 : 1392-, 2018

    18 Keith R. Fisher, "Banking Law Manual" 2017

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.56 0.56 0.72
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.75 0.7 0.866 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼