RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      인지적 부담, 형식 초점 활동 및 학습자의 인식이 언어형식 학습에 미치는 영향 = Effects of cognitive load, form-focused activities, and learner awareness on the learning of language forms

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104106079

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Communicative activities can facilitate a variety of interactional aspects as a necessary condition to develop communicative competence. Although communicative competence includes both fluency and accuracy, many studies focused mainly on the development of fluency by using communicative activities. With an important role of accuracy in communication, this study analyzed the effects of cognitive load, form-focused activities, and learner awareness on the learning of language forms. Three kinds of communicative activities were designed and they were applied to experimental classes in which 48 sophomores participated. Cognitive load can deteriorate interactional aspects for the learning of language forms. Some strategies such as planning, use of written language, and repetition were used in order to reduce learners’ cognitive load. Form-focused activities can help learners notice language forms and structure the forms. Form-focused activities were designed by using corrective feedback, input enhancement, and form-focused exercises. The levels of learner awareness also can have a positive or negative effect on interactional aspects. The data were analyzed in terms of interactional aspects and the learning of language forms. The findings of this study demonstrate that activities to reduce learners’ cognitive load and form-focused activities can facilitate the learning of language forms, especially in terms of interactional aspects for the learning of language forms. The results also reveal that the interactional aspects may be affected by the levels of learner awareness.
      번역하기

      Communicative activities can facilitate a variety of interactional aspects as a necessary condition to develop communicative competence. Although communicative competence includes both fluency and accuracy, many studies focused mainly on the developme...

      Communicative activities can facilitate a variety of interactional aspects as a necessary condition to develop communicative competence. Although communicative competence includes both fluency and accuracy, many studies focused mainly on the development of fluency by using communicative activities. With an important role of accuracy in communication, this study analyzed the effects of cognitive load, form-focused activities, and learner awareness on the learning of language forms. Three kinds of communicative activities were designed and they were applied to experimental classes in which 48 sophomores participated. Cognitive load can deteriorate interactional aspects for the learning of language forms. Some strategies such as planning, use of written language, and repetition were used in order to reduce learners’ cognitive load. Form-focused activities can help learners notice language forms and structure the forms. Form-focused activities were designed by using corrective feedback, input enhancement, and form-focused exercises. The levels of learner awareness also can have a positive or negative effect on interactional aspects. The data were analyzed in terms of interactional aspects and the learning of language forms. The findings of this study demonstrate that activities to reduce learners’ cognitive load and form-focused activities can facilitate the learning of language forms, especially in terms of interactional aspects for the learning of language forms. The results also reveal that the interactional aspects may be affected by the levels of learner awareness.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김혜경, "형태초점 의사소통 교수학습 모형을 적용한 대학 토익 문법 수업의 효과" 한국현대영어영문학회 57 (57): 75-96, 2013

      2 유범, "중학교 영어교과 학습부진 학생의 어휘 및 문법 학습 경험에 관한 질적 연구" 한국영어교과교육학회 13 (13): 105-127, 2014

      3 박신향, "입력과 출력중심 및 복합 형태초점 의사소통 활동과 학습자의 사전지식 수준이목표문법 학습에 미치는 영향" 한국외국어교육학회 20 (20): 147-173, 2013

      4 최윤정, "딕토글로스 활동이 초등학생의 부정문 학습에 미치는 영향" 한국영어교과교육학회 11 (11): 157-176, 2012

      5 Swain, M., "The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough" 50 (50): 158-164, 1993

      6 Krashen, S., "The input hypothesis: issues and implications" Longman 1985

      7 Robinson, P., "The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning" 21 (21): 45-105, 2003

      8 한은희, "Teaching EFL college writing: Grammatically-correctness-free-setting" 한국영어교과교육학회 8 (8): 145-162, 2009

      9 Gass, S., "Stimulated recall methodology in second language research" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2000

      10 Finch, A., "My First English Discussion 1" Pearson Longman 2008

      1 김혜경, "형태초점 의사소통 교수학습 모형을 적용한 대학 토익 문법 수업의 효과" 한국현대영어영문학회 57 (57): 75-96, 2013

      2 유범, "중학교 영어교과 학습부진 학생의 어휘 및 문법 학습 경험에 관한 질적 연구" 한국영어교과교육학회 13 (13): 105-127, 2014

      3 박신향, "입력과 출력중심 및 복합 형태초점 의사소통 활동과 학습자의 사전지식 수준이목표문법 학습에 미치는 영향" 한국외국어교육학회 20 (20): 147-173, 2013

      4 최윤정, "딕토글로스 활동이 초등학생의 부정문 학습에 미치는 영향" 한국영어교과교육학회 11 (11): 157-176, 2012

      5 Swain, M., "The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough" 50 (50): 158-164, 1993

      6 Krashen, S., "The input hypothesis: issues and implications" Longman 1985

      7 Robinson, P., "The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning" 21 (21): 45-105, 2003

      8 한은희, "Teaching EFL college writing: Grammatically-correctness-free-setting" 한국영어교과교육학회 8 (8): 145-162, 2009

      9 Gass, S., "Stimulated recall methodology in second language research" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2000

      10 Finch, A., "My First English Discussion 1" Pearson Longman 2008

      11 Mackey, A., "Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning" Oxford University Press 2012

      12 Long, M., "Handbook of research on language acquisition: Second language acquisition" Academic Press 413-468, 1996

      13 Bachman, L., "Fundamental considerations in language testing" Oxford University Press 1990

      14 Fotos, S., "Form-focused instruction and teacher education" Oxford University Press 2007

      15 Long, M., "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition" Cambridge University Press 15-41, 1998

      16 Williams, J., "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition" Cambridge University Press 139-155, 1998

      17 White, J., "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition" Cambridge University Press 85-113, 1998

      18 Doughty, C., "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition" Cambridge University Press 114-138, 1998

      19 DeKeyser, R., "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition" Cambridge University Press 42-63, 1998

      20 Sachs, R., "Conversational interaction in second language acquisition" Oxford University Press 197-225, 2007

      21 Mackey, A., "Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings?" 82 (82): 338-356, 1998

      22 Brandle, K., "Communicative language teaching in action" Pearson Education 2008

      23 Willis, J., "A framework for task-based learning" Pearson Education 1996

      24 Skehan, P., "A cognitive approach to language learning" Oxford University Press 1998

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.77 0.77 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.78 0.81 1.48 0.17
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼