RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    시설부담금 산정에 관한 분쟁 사례 연구 = A Case Study on Installation Charges Dispute Settlement by Benefits Analysis

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103952751

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Composition depending on the development of industrial sites are located just within the existing facilities are hoping to become a retention, in accordance with the law will impose a liability amount. Then calculating the profit and loss analysis of the retention is required. In other words, the composition of the industrial site will be retained for existing facilities and the amount of the profit is necessary to analyze. In this study, the calculation of expenses and the income of retained existing facilities will be presented with analytical methods.
    Especially the existing cases of dispute with the results of the adjustment and the calculation of contributions for a range of benefits associated with the analysis according to 'The Industrial Sites and Development Act', the following conclusions were drawn.
    According to 'The Industrial Sites and Development Act', the facility at the industrial site composition within the limits of increasing the convenience of being charged is reasonable. In particular, the industrial site of buildings located within existing facilities depending on the composition and future industrial sites are public facilities available for the facility to consider the possibility of calculating contributions to be reasonable.
    Additional benefits which can be the land prices, tax exemptions, and increasing efficiency of land use for the benefits are not yet realized the benefits against the expenses side, as well as imposing double taxation. Therefore, the heavy emphasis on convenience is not considered to be reasonable.
    Including in the industrial site, the cost of damages caused, that is, noise, pollution, and the defective product possibility should be considered a side opinion, but it still does not promote the development of states estimated the cost of the damage is not right to be counted. Therefore, this facility should not be included in calculating contributions.
    번역하기

    Composition depending on the development of industrial sites are located just within the existing facilities are hoping to become a retention, in accordance with the law will impose a liability amount. Then calculating the profit and loss analysis of ...

    Composition depending on the development of industrial sites are located just within the existing facilities are hoping to become a retention, in accordance with the law will impose a liability amount. Then calculating the profit and loss analysis of the retention is required. In other words, the composition of the industrial site will be retained for existing facilities and the amount of the profit is necessary to analyze. In this study, the calculation of expenses and the income of retained existing facilities will be presented with analytical methods.
    Especially the existing cases of dispute with the results of the adjustment and the calculation of contributions for a range of benefits associated with the analysis according to 'The Industrial Sites and Development Act', the following conclusions were drawn.
    According to 'The Industrial Sites and Development Act', the facility at the industrial site composition within the limits of increasing the convenience of being charged is reasonable. In particular, the industrial site of buildings located within existing facilities depending on the composition and future industrial sites are public facilities available for the facility to consider the possibility of calculating contributions to be reasonable.
    Additional benefits which can be the land prices, tax exemptions, and increasing efficiency of land use for the benefits are not yet realized the benefits against the expenses side, as well as imposing double taxation. Therefore, the heavy emphasis on convenience is not considered to be reasonable.
    Including in the industrial site, the cost of damages caused, that is, noise, pollution, and the defective product possibility should be considered a side opinion, but it still does not promote the development of states estimated the cost of the damage is not right to be counted. Therefore, this facility should not be included in calculating contributions.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "택지개발촉진법/시행령/시행규칙"

    2 "산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률/법률 시행령/법률 시행규칙"

    3 노동성, "민원 사례를 통해 본 기반시설 설치 부담의 문제점과 개선방안" 2007

    4 강병주, "도시개발사업에서 공공시설 비용부담에 관한 연구- 도시철도 사업을 중심으로 -" 한국지역개발학회 15 (15): 145-164, 2003

    5 강운산, "기반시설부담금제도 정비 방안" 한국건설산업연구원 2007

    6 이영성, "기반시설부담금의 이론과 제도운용" 43 : 2005

    7 강운산, "기반시설부담금의 문제점과 대안 검토. in: 건설산업동향" 한국건설산업연구원 2005

    8 "국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률/법률 시행령/법률 시행규칙"

    9 강운산, "건설 관련 부담금 제도의 문제점과 개선 방안" 한국건설산업연구원 2008

    10 건설교통부, "개발부담금제도 개요" 2006

    1 "택지개발촉진법/시행령/시행규칙"

    2 "산업입지 및 개발에 관한 법률/법률 시행령/법률 시행규칙"

    3 노동성, "민원 사례를 통해 본 기반시설 설치 부담의 문제점과 개선방안" 2007

    4 강병주, "도시개발사업에서 공공시설 비용부담에 관한 연구- 도시철도 사업을 중심으로 -" 한국지역개발학회 15 (15): 145-164, 2003

    5 강운산, "기반시설부담금제도 정비 방안" 한국건설산업연구원 2007

    6 이영성, "기반시설부담금의 이론과 제도운용" 43 : 2005

    7 강운산, "기반시설부담금의 문제점과 대안 검토. in: 건설산업동향" 한국건설산업연구원 2005

    8 "국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률/법률 시행령/법률 시행규칙"

    9 강운산, "건설 관련 부담금 제도의 문제점과 개선 방안" 한국건설산업연구원 2008

    10 건설교통부, "개발부담금제도 개요" 2006

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-05-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> JOURNAL OF ARBITRATION STUDIES KCI등재후보
    2005-05-30 학술지등록 한글명 : 중재연구
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.1 1.1 1.02
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.99 0.92 1.316 0.18
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼