RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Remittance and Corruption: how does the income level matter?

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108183387

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    How does remittance affect domestic politics? Remittance has increased drastically over the past 30 years, and its political impact has been the center of attention ever since. Focusing on the possibility of substitution between remittances and governments’ spending, existing literature argues that the substitution can improve governance by reducing the dependence of citizens on the incumbent, thereby weakening the clientelism network (e.g., Tyburski 2012, Esrciba-Folch, Meseguer, Wright 2015). We further develop this idea and suggest that this political effect would vary depending on the domestic economic condition. We argue that remittance would reduce corruption of the recipient government, and the alleviation effect would be greater as the size of the low-income group increase. Using panel data which includes up to 60 developing democratic countries from 1995 to 2018, we find evidence consistent with our expectations. We find that remittance reduces the corruption of the recipient countries and the corruption alleviation effect increases in countries with a larger low-income group.
    번역하기

    How does remittance affect domestic politics? Remittance has increased drastically over the past 30 years, and its political impact has been the center of attention ever since. Focusing on the possibility of substitution between remittances and govern...

    How does remittance affect domestic politics? Remittance has increased drastically over the past 30 years, and its political impact has been the center of attention ever since. Focusing on the possibility of substitution between remittances and governments’ spending, existing literature argues that the substitution can improve governance by reducing the dependence of citizens on the incumbent, thereby weakening the clientelism network (e.g., Tyburski 2012, Esrciba-Folch, Meseguer, Wright 2015). We further develop this idea and suggest that this political effect would vary depending on the domestic economic condition. We argue that remittance would reduce corruption of the recipient government, and the alleviation effect would be greater as the size of the low-income group increase. Using panel data which includes up to 60 developing democratic countries from 1995 to 2018, we find evidence consistent with our expectations. We find that remittance reduces the corruption of the recipient countries and the corruption alleviation effect increases in countries with a larger low-income group.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Coppedge, Michael, "V-Dem Methodology v11.1"

    2 Brambor, Thomas, "Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses" 14 (14): 63-82, 2006

    3 Tyburski, "The resource curse reversed? Remittances and corruption in Mexico" 56 (56): 339-350, 2012

    4 Ahmed, Faisal Z., "The perils of unearned foreign income: Aid, remittances, and government survival" 106 (106): 146-165, 2012

    5 Dixit, Avinash, "The determinants of success of special interests in redistributive politics" 58 (58): 1132-1155, 1996

    6 Chhibber, Pradeep K., "State policy, rent seeking, and the electoral success of a religious party in Algeria" 58 (58): 126-148, 1996

    7 Ahmed, Faisal Z., "Remittances deteriorate governance" 95 (95): 1166-1182, 2013

    8 Adams, Richard H, "Remittances and poverty in Ghana. Vol. 3838" World Bank Publications 2006

    9 Abdih, Yasser, "Remittances and institutions: Are remittances a curse?" 40 (40): 657-666, 2012

    10 Escribà-Folch, Abel, "Remittances and democratization" 59 (59): 571-586, 2015

    1 Coppedge, Michael, "V-Dem Methodology v11.1"

    2 Brambor, Thomas, "Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses" 14 (14): 63-82, 2006

    3 Tyburski, "The resource curse reversed? Remittances and corruption in Mexico" 56 (56): 339-350, 2012

    4 Ahmed, Faisal Z., "The perils of unearned foreign income: Aid, remittances, and government survival" 106 (106): 146-165, 2012

    5 Dixit, Avinash, "The determinants of success of special interests in redistributive politics" 58 (58): 1132-1155, 1996

    6 Chhibber, Pradeep K., "State policy, rent seeking, and the electoral success of a religious party in Algeria" 58 (58): 126-148, 1996

    7 Ahmed, Faisal Z., "Remittances deteriorate governance" 95 (95): 1166-1182, 2013

    8 Adams, Richard H, "Remittances and poverty in Ghana. Vol. 3838" World Bank Publications 2006

    9 Abdih, Yasser, "Remittances and institutions: Are remittances a curse?" 40 (40): 657-666, 2012

    10 Escribà-Folch, Abel, "Remittances and democratization" 59 (59): 571-586, 2015

    11 Mosley, Layna, "Migration, labor, and the international political economy" 18 : 283-301, 2015

    12 Adams, Richard, "Migration and development within and across borders: Research and policy perspectives on internal and international migration" 101-130, 2008

    13 World Bank, "Migration and Remittances: Recent Developments and Outlook" 2014

    14 Winters, Matthew S., "Lacking information or condoning corruption:When do voters support corrupt politicians?" 45 (45): 418-436, 2013

    15 Kurtz, Marcus J., "Free market democracy and the Chilean and Mexican countryside" Cambridge University Press 2004

    16 Blaydes, Lisa, "Elections and distributive politics in Mubarak’s Egypt" Cambridge University Press 2010

    17 Gupta, Sanjeev, "Effect of remittances on poverty and financial development in Sub-Saharan Africa" 37 (37): 104-115, 2009

    18 Amat, Francesc, "Economic and political inequality: The role of political mobilization. No. 277" Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE) 2016

    19 Williams, Kevin, "Do remittances improve political institutions? Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa" 61 : 65-75, 2017

    20 Adida, Claire L., "Do migrants improve their hometowns? Remittances and access to public services in Mexico, 1995-2000" 44 (44): 3-27, 2011

    21 Tyburski, "Curse or cure? Migrant remittances and corruption" 76 (76): 814-824, 2014

    22 Stokes, Susan C, "Brokers, voters, and clientelism: The puzzle of distributive politics" Cambridge University Press 2013

    23 Brady, Henry E., "Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation" 89 (89): 271-294, 1995

    24 Adsera, Alicia, "Are you being served? Political accountability and quality of government" 19 (19): 445-490, 2003

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2024 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2018-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼