RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    한국 중년성인의 심리적 복지감 척도구조와 문항정보 = Psychological well-being structure and item information of Korean adults

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104582054

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to examine the validity of psychological well-being measurements which is developed by Carol Ryff (1989), for Korean adults, in terms of the structures and amounts of information. The data came from 'Exploring Successful Developmental Factors of Middle Aged' with 1,666 Korean adults aged 30s to 60s. First, Confirmatory factor analysis suggested Ryff's psychological well-being models did not fit well with Korean middle aged adults. Second, item response theory analyses revealed significant variance and limited information for most items for Korean. Only ten among eighteen items provides good amounts of information for psychological well-being of Korean adults. Third, only four sub-dimensions of Ryff's psychological well-being works for Korean adults' well-being structure. This study suggests that development of psychological well-being measurement including cultural characteristics of Korean adults is needed rather than using the measurement which developed for U.S. adults without checking validity.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to examine the validity of psychological well-being measurements which is developed by Carol Ryff (1989), for Korean adults, in terms of the structures and amounts of information. The data came from 'Exploring Successful D...

    The purpose of this study is to examine the validity of psychological well-being measurements which is developed by Carol Ryff (1989), for Korean adults, in terms of the structures and amounts of information. The data came from 'Exploring Successful Developmental Factors of Middle Aged' with 1,666 Korean adults aged 30s to 60s. First, Confirmatory factor analysis suggested Ryff's psychological well-being models did not fit well with Korean middle aged adults. Second, item response theory analyses revealed significant variance and limited information for most items for Korean. Only ten among eighteen items provides good amounts of information for psychological well-being of Korean adults. Third, only four sub-dimensions of Ryff's psychological well-being works for Korean adults' well-being structure. This study suggests that development of psychological well-being measurement including cultural characteristics of Korean adults is needed rather than using the measurement which developed for U.S. adults without checking validity.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 한경혜, "중년기 남녀의 사회적 역할과 정신건강" 22 (22): 209-225, 2002

    2 김혜원, "우리나라 기혼 여성들의 심리적 안녕감의 구조 분석 및 주관적 안녕감과의 관계 분석" 5 (5): 27-41, 2000

    3 김명소, "심리적 안녕감의 구성 개념 분석 : 한국 성인 남녀를 대상으로" 15 (15): 19-39, 2001

    4 한경혜, "성공적인 중년기 발달요인 탐색: 정신건강 및 일/ 가족 라이프고스의 한미간 비교연구" 2001

    5 김윤정, "사회적지지 관점으로 본 가족부양이 노인의 정신건강에 미치는 영향" 2000

    6 이혜자, "대도시 여성노인의 정신건강과 사회인구학적 관련변인 : 심리적 복지감과 우울감을 중심으로" 127-150, 2003

    7 김태현, "노인의 삶의 질 향상에 관한 연구" 19 (19): 61-76, 1999

    8 "or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being Journal of Personality & Social Psychology" 1069-1081, 1989

    9 Lambert, M.C, "is it prudent to administer all items for each Child behavior Checklist Syndrome? Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Youth Self-Report dimensions with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory" 15 : 550-568, 2003

    10 Tabachnick, B. G, "Using multivariate statistics" Harper Collins 1996

    1 한경혜, "중년기 남녀의 사회적 역할과 정신건강" 22 (22): 209-225, 2002

    2 김혜원, "우리나라 기혼 여성들의 심리적 안녕감의 구조 분석 및 주관적 안녕감과의 관계 분석" 5 (5): 27-41, 2000

    3 김명소, "심리적 안녕감의 구성 개념 분석 : 한국 성인 남녀를 대상으로" 15 (15): 19-39, 2001

    4 한경혜, "성공적인 중년기 발달요인 탐색: 정신건강 및 일/ 가족 라이프고스의 한미간 비교연구" 2001

    5 김윤정, "사회적지지 관점으로 본 가족부양이 노인의 정신건강에 미치는 영향" 2000

    6 이혜자, "대도시 여성노인의 정신건강과 사회인구학적 관련변인 : 심리적 복지감과 우울감을 중심으로" 127-150, 2003

    7 김태현, "노인의 삶의 질 향상에 관한 연구" 19 (19): 61-76, 1999

    8 "or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being Journal of Personality & Social Psychology" 1069-1081, 1989

    9 Lambert, M.C, "is it prudent to administer all items for each Child behavior Checklist Syndrome? Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Youth Self-Report dimensions with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory" 15 : 550-568, 2003

    10 Tabachnick, B. G, "Using multivariate statistics" Harper Collins 1996

    11 Maslow, "Toward a psychology of being" 1968

    12 Lee, "Through the lens of culture Psychological well-being at midlife Paper presented at the meetings of Gerontological Society of America" 1993

    13 Ryff, C. D., "The structure of psychological well-being revisited" 64 (64): 719-727, 1995

    14 Campbell,A, "Subjective measure of psychological well-being" 2 : 117-124, 1976

    15 Steiger,J.H, "Structural model evaluation and modification:An interval estimation approach" 25 : 173-180, 1990

    16 Marmot, M, "Social inequalities in health: Next questions and converging evidence" 44 (44): 901-910, 1997

    17 Andrews, "Social indicatoes of well-being America's percception of life quality" Plenum 1976

    18 Showers, C, "Self-differentiation and well-being in a life transition" 22 (22): 448-460, 1996

    19 Keyes, C. L. M, "Psychological well-being in mid-life : Life in the middle" Academic Press 161-180, 1999

    20 Ryff, C. D, "Psychological well-being in adult life Current Directions in Psychological Science" 4 (4): 99-104, 1995

    21 Ryff, C. D, "Psychological well- being: Meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research." 14-23, 1996

    22 Baltes, "Perspectives from the behavioral sciences" Cambridge University Press 1990

    23 Allport, "Patterns and growth in personality" 1961

    24 Mellenbergh,G, "Measurement precision in test score and item response models" 1 : 293-299, 1996

    25 Embretson, S. E, "Item response theory for psychologists" 2000

    26 Weiss, D. J., "Improving individual differences measurement with item response theory and computerized adaptive testing Assessing individual differences in human behavior" Davies-Black Publishing 49-79, 1995

    27 Keyes, C. L. M, "Generativity in adult lives: Social structural contours and quality of life consequences : Generativity and adult development: How and why we care for the next generation" Generativity and adult development 227-264, 1998

    28 Oxford, R. M, "Basic cross- validation: Using the "holdout" method to assess the generalizability of results" 8 (8): 83-89, 2001

    29 De Ayala,R.J, "An Introduction to Polytomous Item Response Theory Models" Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 25 : 172-89, 1993

    30 Vandenberg, R. J, "A review and synthesis of measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research." 3 : 4-69, 2000

    31 Schumacker, R. E, "A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling" 1996

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.88 1.88 1.8
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.85 2.02 2.36 0.43
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼