The so-called Haeng/Su-je(行守制) system was a method of indicating the "discrepancy" between one"s rank(a) and the grade of one"s post(b). Either the letter "Haeng(行)" or "Su(守)" was added to the title of one"s post(b) to suggest such discrepa...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99557486
2012
Korean
900
KCI등재
학술저널
75-107(33쪽)
6
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The so-called Haeng/Su-je(行守制) system was a method of indicating the "discrepancy" between one"s rank(a) and the grade of one"s post(b). Either the letter "Haeng(行)" or "Su(守)" was added to the title of one"s post(b) to suggest such discrepa...
The so-called Haeng/Su-je(行守制) system was a method of indicating the "discrepancy" between one"s rank(a) and the grade of one"s post(b). Either the letter "Haeng(行)" or "Su(守)" was added to the title of one"s post(b) to suggest such discrepancy. In China, the San"gwan institution first appeared in the Dang dynasty period, and continued through the Seon"hwa period of the Sung dynasty. But the Haeng/Su-je system employed by the Goryeo government was very much different from its Chinese counterparts, in terms of its nature and its functions.
In Goryeo, with the San"jik("honorary") institution in place, officials were bestowed with either titular "Geom"gyo-jik/檢校職" or "Dong"jeong-jik/同正職" posts, and in cases they were given the honorary titular posts and substantially functional ones both at the same time, either "Haeng" and "Su" letters were added to the front of the latter, in order to differentiate one from the other. The "Haeng" was also used in cases in which the recipient originally had honorary W(a)e-Myeong"bu/外命婦 titles or honorary San"jik posts and were provided with an additional title or post in the same vein. In these cases, the letter "Haeng" was added to the front of the "original" San"jik post or W(a)e-Myeong"bu title.
These Haeng"jik and Su"jik examples appear more frequently in "in-grave" epitaphs and census data, than in the official governmental records of history. The former types of materials tended to document the entire career of the buried person or the lineage of the family head with great details, and also included the honorary and hereditary titles of the father, grandfather and even great-grandfather of the person in question as well.
In the early days of the San"jik-je institution, the number of Su"jik posts" appearances and the number of Haeng"jik posts" appearances were relatively the same. But with the passage of time, the number of the former dropped substantially, and only the Haeng"jik posts continued to appear. There seems to have been a couple of reasons. Since the reign of King Hyeonjong, Su"jik posts for the "3 Elders and 3 Masters("3師3公")," which were different figures from the "ordinary" Su"jik posts of the earlier periods, heavily appeared. And after the Mongols" arrival, Su"jik posts with a new meaning of "associate(副)" appeared as well. So, it seems like in order to avoid confusion with all these new usages of the "Su," the Su"jik posts in general were practically avoided as a whole and were not that much used any longer. If there was a working standard or rule for these Haeng"jik and Su"jik posts, then they would have remained in active usage till the end of the dynasty, but there were none, so they did not.
As we can see, the Haeng"jik and Su"jik posts in Goryeo were originally imported from the Dang and Sung dynasties, where the Haeng"jik and Su"jik posts were used to indicate the discrepancy between the rank and the grade of the title, but in reality it was used in a completely different fashion, for the Goryeo governmental officials.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 이기백, "驪州李氏 壬子年 准戶口, In 한국상대고문서자료집성" 일지사 1987
2 이성무, "양반과 관직, In 조선초기 양반연구" 일조각 1980
3 이인철, "신라 중앙관부의 조직과 운영, In 신라정치제도사연구" 일지사 1993
4 김갑동, "고려초의 관계와 향직" 78 : 1997
5 이정훈, "고려전기 문산계 운영에 대한 재검토" 국학연구원 (150) : 197-228, 2010
6 김광수, "고려시대의 동정직" 11·12 : 1969
7 박용운, "고려시대의 관직과 관계, In 고려시대 관계·관직연구" 고려대출판부 1997
8 박용운, "고려시대의 文散階, In 진단학보 52 ; 1997 고려시대 관계·관직연구" 고려대출판부 1981
9 박용운, "고려시대의 文散階, In 고려시대 관계·관직연구" 고려대출판부 1997
10 이성무, "고려시대의 散職, In 조선초기 양반연구" 일조각 1980
1 이기백, "驪州李氏 壬子年 准戶口, In 한국상대고문서자료집성" 일지사 1987
2 이성무, "양반과 관직, In 조선초기 양반연구" 일조각 1980
3 이인철, "신라 중앙관부의 조직과 운영, In 신라정치제도사연구" 일지사 1993
4 김갑동, "고려초의 관계와 향직" 78 : 1997
5 이정훈, "고려전기 문산계 운영에 대한 재검토" 국학연구원 (150) : 197-228, 2010
6 김광수, "고려시대의 동정직" 11·12 : 1969
7 박용운, "고려시대의 관직과 관계, In 고려시대 관계·관직연구" 고려대출판부 1997
8 박용운, "고려시대의 文散階, In 진단학보 52 ; 1997 고려시대 관계·관직연구" 고려대출판부 1981
9 박용운, "고려시대의 文散階, In 고려시대 관계·관직연구" 고려대출판부 1997
10 이성무, "고려시대의 散職, In 조선초기 양반연구" 일조각 1980
11 김용선, "고려묘지명집성" 한림대출판부 2006
12 武田幸男, "高麗時代の鄕職" 47 (47): 1964
13 末松保和, "高麗初期の兩班について" 36 (36): 1953
14 武田幸男, "高麗初期の官階" 41 : 1966
15 旗田巍, "高麗の武散階, In 朝鮮學報 21·22合集 ; 1972 朝鮮中世社會史の硏究" 法政大出版部 1961
16 武普照, "秦漢守官制度考述" (4) : 1988
17 兪宗憲, "宋代職官品階硏究, In 文史 21" 中華書局 1983
18 丁浚華, "宋代寄祿官制度初探" (4) : 1986
19 朱瑞熙, "中國政治制度通史 6(宋代卷)" 人民出版社 1996
20 兪鹿年, "中國政治制度通史 5(隋唐五代卷)" 人民出版社 1996
21 兪鹿年, "中國官制大事典 下, In 職官官吏制度 任用類別" 黑龍江人民出版社 1998
22 孫文良, "中國官制史" 臺北 文津出版社 1996
23 李超鋼, "中國古代官吏制度淺論" 勞動人事出版社 1989
24 金映遂, "5교 양종에 대하야" 8 : 1937
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2005-10-05 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 역사와 현실 -> 역사와 현실외국어명 : 미등록 -> YŎKSA WA HYŎNSIL | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2001-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 1998-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.87 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.87 | 0.92 | 1.68 | 0.36 |