RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE

      Comparative Study of Low Doses of Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin on Lipid and Glycemic Control in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome and Hypercholesterolemia

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103884449

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Background/Aims: This multicenter, open-labeled, randomized trial was performed to compare the effects of rosuvastatin 10 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg on lipid and glycemic control in Korean patients with nondiabetic metabolic syndrome.
      Methods: In total, 351 patients who met the modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) criteria for metabolic syndrome with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥ 130 mg/dL were randomized to receive either rosuvastatin 10 mg (n = 173) or atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 178) for over 6 weeks.
      Results: After 6 weeks of treatment, greater reductions in total cholesterol (- 35.94 ± 11.38 vs. - 30.07 ± 10.46%, p < 0.001), LDL-C (48.04 ± 14.45 vs. 39.52 ± 14.42%, p < 0.001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (- 42.93 ± 13.15 vs. - 35.52 ± 11.76%, p < 0.001), and apolipoprotein-B (- 38.7 ± 18.85 vs. - 32.57 ± 17.56%, p = 0.002) levels were observed in the rosuvastatin group as compared to the atorvastatin group. Overall, the percentage of patients attaining the NCEP ATP III goal was higher with rosuvastatin as compared to atorvastatin (87.64 vs. 69.88%, p < 0.001). Changes in glucose and insulin levels, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index were not significantly different between the two groups. The safety and tolerability of the two agents were similar.
      Conclusions: Rosuvastatin 10 mg was more effective than atorvastatin 10 mg in achieving NCEP ATP III LDL-C goals in patients with nondiabetic metabolic syndrome, especially in those with lower NCEP ATP III target level goals. (Korean J Intern Med 2010;25:27-35)
      번역하기

      Background/Aims: This multicenter, open-labeled, randomized trial was performed to compare the effects of rosuvastatin 10 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg on lipid and glycemic control in Korean patients with nondiabetic metabolic syndrome. Methods: In total...

      Background/Aims: This multicenter, open-labeled, randomized trial was performed to compare the effects of rosuvastatin 10 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg on lipid and glycemic control in Korean patients with nondiabetic metabolic syndrome.
      Methods: In total, 351 patients who met the modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) criteria for metabolic syndrome with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥ 130 mg/dL were randomized to receive either rosuvastatin 10 mg (n = 173) or atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 178) for over 6 weeks.
      Results: After 6 weeks of treatment, greater reductions in total cholesterol (- 35.94 ± 11.38 vs. - 30.07 ± 10.46%, p < 0.001), LDL-C (48.04 ± 14.45 vs. 39.52 ± 14.42%, p < 0.001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (- 42.93 ± 13.15 vs. - 35.52 ± 11.76%, p < 0.001), and apolipoprotein-B (- 38.7 ± 18.85 vs. - 32.57 ± 17.56%, p = 0.002) levels were observed in the rosuvastatin group as compared to the atorvastatin group. Overall, the percentage of patients attaining the NCEP ATP III goal was higher with rosuvastatin as compared to atorvastatin (87.64 vs. 69.88%, p < 0.001). Changes in glucose and insulin levels, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index were not significantly different between the two groups. The safety and tolerability of the two agents were similar.
      Conclusions: Rosuvastatin 10 mg was more effective than atorvastatin 10 mg in achieving NCEP ATP III LDL-C goals in patients with nondiabetic metabolic syndrome, especially in those with lower NCEP ATP III target level goals. (Korean J Intern Med 2010;25:27-35)

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Boden WE, "Therapeutic implications of recent ATP III guidelines and the important role of combination therapy in total dyslipidemia management" 18 : 278-285, 2003

      2 최성희, "The Prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome in Korean Adults: Comparison of WHO and NCEP Criteria" 연세대학교의과대학 46 (46): 198-205, 2005

      3 Yood MU, "Racial differences in reaching target low-density lipoprotein goal among individuals treated with prescription statin therapy" 152 : 777-784, 2006

      4 Hyuk Sang Kwon, "Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of the Metabolic Syndrome in Middle-Aged Korean Adults; Chungju Insulin Resistance Cohort Study (CIRC Study)" 대한내과학회 20 (20): 310-316, 2005

      5 Brewer HB Jr, "New features of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III lipid-lowering guidelines" 26 : III19-III24, 2003

      6 Dekker JM, "Metabolic syndrome and 10-year cardiovascular disease risk in the Hoorn Study" 112 : 666-673, 2005

      7 Young-Kwon Kim, "Impact of the Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components on Pulse Wave Velocity" 대한내과학회 21 (21): 109-115, 2006

      8 National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), "Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)" 285 : 2486-2497, 2001

      9 Leibovitz E, "Efficacy of atorvastatin in treating high risk patients to reach low density lipoproteincholesterol goals: the Treat to Target (TTT-Israel) Study" 4 : 407-410, 2002

      10 Deedwania PC, "Effects of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin on atherogenic dyslipidemia in patients with characteristics of the metabolic syndrome" 95 : 360-366, 2005

      1 Boden WE, "Therapeutic implications of recent ATP III guidelines and the important role of combination therapy in total dyslipidemia management" 18 : 278-285, 2003

      2 최성희, "The Prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome in Korean Adults: Comparison of WHO and NCEP Criteria" 연세대학교의과대학 46 (46): 198-205, 2005

      3 Yood MU, "Racial differences in reaching target low-density lipoprotein goal among individuals treated with prescription statin therapy" 152 : 777-784, 2006

      4 Hyuk Sang Kwon, "Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of the Metabolic Syndrome in Middle-Aged Korean Adults; Chungju Insulin Resistance Cohort Study (CIRC Study)" 대한내과학회 20 (20): 310-316, 2005

      5 Brewer HB Jr, "New features of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III lipid-lowering guidelines" 26 : III19-III24, 2003

      6 Dekker JM, "Metabolic syndrome and 10-year cardiovascular disease risk in the Hoorn Study" 112 : 666-673, 2005

      7 Young-Kwon Kim, "Impact of the Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components on Pulse Wave Velocity" 대한내과학회 21 (21): 109-115, 2006

      8 National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), "Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)" 285 : 2486-2497, 2001

      9 Leibovitz E, "Efficacy of atorvastatin in treating high risk patients to reach low density lipoproteincholesterol goals: the Treat to Target (TTT-Israel) Study" 4 : 407-410, 2002

      10 Deedwania PC, "Effects of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin on atherogenic dyslipidemia in patients with characteristics of the metabolic syndrome" 95 : 360-366, 2005

      11 Naples M, "Effect of rosuvastatin on insulin sensitivity in an animal model of insulin resistance: evidence for statin-induced hepatic insulin sensitization" 198 : 94-103, 2008

      12 Davidson MH, "Differences between clinical trial efficacy and realworld effectiveness" 12 : S405-S411, 2006

      13 McKenney JM, "Comparison of the efficacy of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin in achieving lipid goals: results from the STELLAR trial" 19 : 689-698, 2003

      14 Clearfield MB, "Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin 10 mg and atorvastatin 20 mg in high-risk patients with hypercholesterolemia: prospective study to evaluate the Use of Low doses of the Statins Atorvastatin and Rosuvastatin (PULSAR)" 7 (7): 2006

      15 Deedwania PC, "Comparison of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in South-Asian patients at risk of coronary heart disease (from the IRIS Trial)" 99 : 1538-1543, 2007

      16 Ferdinand KC, "Comparison of efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in African-American patients in a six-week trial" 97 : 229-235, 2006

      17 Grundy SM, "Clinical management of metabolic syndrome: report of the American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Diabetes Association conference on scientific issues related to management" 109 : 551-556, 2004

      18 Pivatto I, "Association between proinsulin, insulin, proinsulin/insulin ratio, and insulin resistance status with the metabolic syndrome" 51 : 1128-1133, 2007

      19 Stalenhoef AF, "A comparative study with rosuvastatin in subjects with metabolic syndrome: results of the COMETS study" 26 : 2664-2672, 2005

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.37 0.26 1.02
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.83 0.73 0.566 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼