공유 공간과 커뮤니티 = Shared Space and Community

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Due to its own configuration, space can manifest various characteristics and also cause specific behavior. Shared space is a semi-public/private space, which is located roughly in between public and private space. In other words, it contains the closed part of public area and open part of private section. From the emotional point of view, this space is capable of healing mental disease of the lonely moderns by the intimate relationship among humans, connection each other, and communication. This space is divided into ‘territoriality’, ‘accessability’, and ‘functionality’ based on its function. It is also summarized by categorizing it into friendly relation, openness, and humanity based on its emotional point. Moreover, this space has a point of contact with the expression of modern community. Being obscure among boundaries of modern communities is very similar to the point that the boundaries are ambiguous as the shared space is laid across both public and private section. Moreover, that the shared space is developed in a type of network can be compared with the characteristics of the shared space to make connection with humans. Open and public characteristics have the similar direction with what this space is pursuing. Based on these characteristics, the amenity plan was applied as an activation plan for the community. Especially, constructional amenity plan is progressed focusing on convenience, nature-friendliness, esthetic appreciation, and culture. Amenity plan, which applies landscape architecture, means comprehensive comfortableness of the environment after all, and also a paradigm which can improve the quality of space. Moreover, physical environments and programs for environmental improvement and community activation are capable of building a community infrastructure. Like the architectural amenity plan, the shared space can also lead the characteristics of the public space to the private space, which forms inter-relationship with intimacy. Thus it is highly probable that the community can be activated in the space. The interior and the exterior in architecture can be considered by applying them to the public and private space.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가며
• Ⅱ. 공공 공간과 공유 공간
• Ⅲ. 공유 공간의 특성
• Ⅳ. 공유 공간과 커뮤니티
• Ⅴ. 나가며
• 참고문헌
• 논문초록

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김영도, "커뮤니티 시설에 따른 공원 활성화 방안에 관한 연구" 대한건축학회 24 (24): 2004

2 박광재, "집합주거단지의 공간질서와 계획기법 연구" 建國大學校 大學院 1998

3 홍이식, "집합주거단지에서 지역성을 통한 커뮤니티 형성에 관한 연구" 대한건축학회 24 (24): 2004

4 최기원, "지역문화시설의 공공성과 계획요소에 관한 연구 : 서울시 구민회관 사례를 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2005

5 한나 아렌트, "인간의 조건" 한길사 2008

6 김해창, "어메니티-환경을 넘어서는 실천사상" 따님 1998

7 최갑수, "서양에서 공공성과 공공영역" (9) : 2001

8 사이토 준이치, "민주적 공공성" 도서출판 이음 2004

9 고재웅, "디자인 서울 공공 공간 가이드라인의 한계와 개선방안에 관한 연구" 서울시립대학교 대학원 2010

10 유창윤, "도심 집합주거 공유공간의 프로그램 조직 및 공간 구축 방법에 관한 연구" 건국대학교 건축전문대학원 2010

11 이지영, "도시공원의 노매딕 스케이프에 관한 연구 : 수변공원을 중심으로" 홍익대학교 대학원 2009

12 주명옥, "도시 공공공간의 어메니티 추구형 장소마케팅 전략 연구" 전남대학교 문화전문대학원 2009

13 Jurgen Habermas, "공론장의 구조변동: 부르주아 사회의 한 범주에 관한 연구" 나남출판사 2001

14 이기호, "공공성" 미메시스 2008

15 손종우, "공공 공간의 도시적 의미에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2000

16 최미옥, "공간의 경계에 관한 연구 : 공유공간을 중심으로" 건국대학교 건축대학원 2000

17 마르쿠스 슈뢰르, "공간,장소,경계" 에코리브르 2010

18 Hoshiar Nooraddin, "in-between space: Towards establishing new methods in Street design" 2 (2): 1999

19 Tim Pharoah, "Traffic Calming Guidelines"

20 G. J. Hardin, "The Tragedy of the Commons" 28 : 1968

21 Jurgen Habermas, "The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society" MIT Press 1989

22 George.A.Hillery Jr, "Definition of community: Areas of Agreement" 20 (20): 1955

23 Robert D. Leighninger, Jr, "Cultural Infrastructure: The Legacy of New Deal Public Space" 49 (49): 1996