신탁법 개정에 따른 부동산법제의 쟁점에 관한 연구 = A Study on Issues with the Real Estate Law System according to the Revisions of Trust Law

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

1. CONTENTS
(1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study is to compare the realestate Trust laws of U.S, particularly civil trust law of with those of Korea.
(2) RESEARCH METHOD
This study is conducted by field investigation and confirmation of practical contents after access to relevant webpages, as well as domestic and foreign literature review.
(3) RESEARCH FINDINGS
The recently revised and enforced Trust Law contains many major changes with regard to real estate, but there is no literature that sorted out or reviewed what kind of problems would be raised in the old Real Estate Law System and related tax systems after the revision of Trust Law. This study thus set out to briefly sort out the revised aspects that might influence the Real Estate Law System and review the issues with the Real Estate Law System and related tax systems.
2. RESULTS
First, it is difficult to say that there were fundamental changes to trust registration even though the scopes of contents of registration and joint and simultaneous application had been expanded.
Second, the nature of trust as a business unit has been reinforced as the issue of limited liability trust and trust bond has been newly recognized along with the combination and division of trust.
Third, the activation of civil trust has been promoted with real estate by recognizing self-beneficiary trust, living trust, and trust for beneficiary in succession. The possibilities for charitable remainder trust in the American law in combination with charitable trust have been heightened considerably.
Finally, institutions that are difficult to explain without recognizing the entity of trust asset such as limited liability trust and trust bond have been introduced and reinforced the position of the trust entity theory in the tax law. It will be positive to revise in a way that recognizes the legal subjecthood of trust according to the legislative cases of the United States for unified interpretations.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• ABSTRACT
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 신탁법상 주요 개정사항
• Ⅲ. 신탁과 그 공시
• Ⅳ. 사업단위로서의 신탁
• Ⅴ. 재산관리 및 상속과 신탁
• Ⅵ. 신탁과 조세
• Ⅶ. 요약 및 결론
• 參考文獻

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이상신, "한국과 미국의 부동산민사신탁에 관한 연구" 한국부동산학회 47 (47): 247-263, 2012

2 김종서, "주택재개발사업에 신탁방식의 적용가능성" 한국부동산학회 (43) : 285-305, 2010

3 이태로, "조세법강의, In 신정7판" 박영사 2011

4 최은순, "자기신탁에 관한 고찰 － 『신탁법』개정안을 중심으로 －" 안암법학회 (32) : 201-236, 2010

5 김태진, "유한책임신탁에 대한 검토와 신탁법 개정을 위한 시사점" 중앙법학회 11 (11): 297-328, 2009

6 이준봉, "유동화거래의 과세에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2012

7 함대영, "신탁형 자산유동화에서의 진정양도 판단" 한국증권법학회 (44) : 2010

8 이중기, "신탁재산의 공시에 관한 연구" 법학연구소 11 (11): 425-453, 2010

9 이중교, "신탁법상의 신탁에 관한 과세상 논점" 법조협회 58 (58): 318-359, 2009

10 홍유석, "신탁법, 전정판" 법문사 1999

11 이영진, "신탁법 검토보고서(법제사법위원회)" 2011

12 이연갑, "신탁법 개정에 따른 부동산등기법 개정안의 검토" 연세대학교 법학연구소 2011

13 이중기, "신탁법" 삼우사 2007

14 최동식, "신탁법" 법문사 2006

15 송덕수, "신민법강의" 박영사 2012

16 최수정, "상속수단으로서의 신탁" 한국민사법학회 (34) : 565-602, 2006

17 최영문, "부동산투자회사에 대한 과세제도 현황과 개선방안 연구" 한국부동산학회 (41) : 123-137, 2010

18 권호근, "부동산투자회사(REITs)제도의 이론적 접근과 전망" 한국부동산학회 (41) : 109-122, 2010

19 조재영, "부동산개발 금융에 관한 법적 고찰 - 프로젝트 파이낸스의 금융구조를 중심으로 -" 한국부동산학회 (40) : 106-119, 2010

20 이성근, "미분양APT를 활용한 자산유동화 연구" 한국부동산학회 (36) : 43-60, 2009

21 Robert L. Mennel, "미국신탁법" 박영사 2011

22 能見善久, "現代信託法" 有斐閣 2004

23 川口幸彦, "信託法改正と相續稅․ 贈與稅の諸問題" (57) : 2008

24 新井誠, "信託法(3版)" 有斐閣 2008

25 李美賢, "信託方式에 의한 資産流動化와 관련된 조세문제" 한국세법학회 9 (9): 37-66, 2003

26 Barry Kaye, "save a fortune on your Estate taxes" Forman publishing inc 1990

27 Charles J. Givens, "Wealth without Risk" simon&schuster 1991

28 Richard D.Barrett, "Planned Giving Essentials(2nd ed)" Aspen Publishers 2002

29 Miller․Jentz, "Business Law today, 5th" WEST 2000