교차로 형태에 따른 차량 당 탄소가스 배출량 비교 = Vehicles’CO2 Emissions by Intersection Types

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

PURPOSES: The present paper is to compare vehicles’CO2 emissions in roundabouts and signalized intersections.
METHODS: The present paper uses the SIDRA software with variables of traffic and road conditions.
RESULTS: The results of the study are as follows : First, when entering traffic volumes are more than 1600pcph, vehicle’s CO2 emissions in roundabouts are lower than those of signalized intersections regardless of the left turn ratio. Second, When entering traffic volumes are more than 2800pcph, vehicles’s CO2 emissions in 2-lane approaches are lower than those of 1-lane approaches in signalized intersection. Third, when entering traffic volumes are more than 1600pcph, vehicle’s CO2 emissions of CASE B are lowest. (CASE B is the condition with one exclusive left-turn lane and one exclusive straight lane and one shared straight lane with right-turn.) Also, CASE A is the condition that vehicle’s CO2emissions in roundabouts are lower than those of signalized intersections between 1600pcph and 3600pcph. (CASE A is the condition with one exclusive left-turn lane and one shared straight lane with right-turn.) But, when entering traffic volumes are more than 4000pcph, vehicle’s CO2emissions in signalized intersections is lower than those of roundabouts.
CONCLUSIONS: It may be concluded that vehicle’s CO2 emissions on roundabouts are much lower than those of signalized intersections,especially, when entering traffics volumes are between 1600pcph and 3600pcph in 1-lane or 2-lane approaches.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박병호, "회전교차로와 4지 신호교차로 효과에 관한 비교분석" 한국ITS학회 8 (8): 27-35, 2009

2 안우영, "진입교통량을 고려한 회전교차로 Signal Metering 운영에 관한 연구" 한국도로학회 14 (14): 175-181, 2012

3 한수산, "다지 회전교차로와 신호교차로의 지체 비교 분석" 한국ITS학회 9 (9): 83-93, 2010

4 임진강, "국내 로터리의 회전교차로 전환에 따른 운영효과 비교분석" 한국도로학회 13 (13): 77-83, 2011

5 AKCELIK AND ASSOCIATES, "aaSIDRA User Guide" Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd 2002

6 "aaSIDRA User Guide" Akcilik&Associated Pty Ltd 2000

7 이정범, "Tier 3 방법을 이용한 회전교차로 도입에 따른 CO_2감축효과" 한국ITS학회 10 (10): 105-112, 2011

8 박병호, "SIDRA를 이용한 4지 1차로 현대식 회전교차로의 효과평가" 한국지역개발학회 17 (17): 89-106, 2005

9 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, "Roundabout Design Guideline"

10 Pakr, Byung-Ho, "Rationalities of Modern Roundabouts in the Intersection Planning" 22 (22): 139-151, 2003

11 Ranhmi Operating cost, fuel consumption, "Ranhmi Operating cost, fuel consumption, and emission models in aaSIDRA and aaMOTION"

12 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, "Korean Highway Capacity Manual" 2001

13 Virginia P. Sisiopiku, "Evaluation of Roundabout Performance Using SIDRA" 2001

14 Foad Shokri, "Comparing the Design of Roundabout and Intersection with aaSIDRA Software" 239-246, 2010

15 International Energy Agency, "CO2 Emissons from Fuel Combustion Highlights 2012 Edition" International Energy Agency 2012

16 National of Environmental Research, "An Investigation of Green House Gas Emission From Automobiles" 2001