韓國大學行政組織의 體制的 分析에 관한 硏究

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

I. Introduction
Until 1950s', our governmental policies for university management or administration were near to laissez-faire. But, since 60s'excessive governmental controls for the University have been cumulative, which lead to restrain the freedom of Academy and institutional autonomy.
Therefore, it is a pivotal issue to establish or manage the freedom of Academy and institutional autonomy in Universities.
Under this acknowledgement, this article focused on the establishment of self-control mechanism in university.
In order to pursuit this goa1, I followed the analysis of Fremont E. Kast and James E. Rosenzweig. They analyzed organization system into environmental suprasystem, goals and values subsystem, structura1 subsystem, technical subsystem, psychosocial subsystem and managerial subsystem.
II. Each Fault and Desirable Orientation of University-Administration System in Korea.
1. Environmental Suprasystem.
Uniformity and regulation are characteristics of university Administration in Korea. To analyze these causes, I especially focused on the legal, ecological and political conditions.
For the stablishment of universities' freedom, Universities need to be guaranteed the political neutrality. And it needs the functional redistribution of the Ministry of Education. Also, it needs to change the behaviors of the educational authorities bureaucrats
2. Goals and Values Subsystem.
By excessive governmental supervision, most of universities in Korea have not idiosyncracy. Therefore, governmental involvement and control have to be confined to elevate the quality of Universities' education, guarantee University autonomy and academic freedom in Korea.
3. Structural Subsystem
As stated above Korea's universities have not institutional autonomy. Therefore, as a top management in a University, President pursuits moralistic conscience and judgement to restore the ideological identity of university.
Also, Trustee Council in private school has to be recovered to do its basic functions.
4. Psychosocial Subsystem
Between professors and the administrative bureaucrats in-university exist intrinsic conflicts.
Therefore, By the harmony of democratism and efficiency, the intrinsic conflict is expected to be unveiled.
5. Technical Subsystem
Administrative complexities in universities have been increasing, so it needs the technical specialization of Administrative elites and the adaptation of computer to the university administration.
6. Managerial Subsystem
A rational legislative or deliberative organ in universities is needed. Therefore, the existing legislative organ is supplemented or reorganized.
III. Conclusion
In order to restore and maintain the Korea's Universities' autonomy universities have to keep to political neutrality and university professors' extensive participation in policy-making process is needed. Also the redistribution of Administrative functions and change of educational authorities bureaucrats' behavior are prerequisite for Korea's universities autonomy.
By doing so, universities have social responsibility and adaptive ability to respond the situational change.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• 第1章 序論 = 1
• 第1節 硏究目的 = 1
• 第2節 硏究範圍와 方法 = 4
• 第2章 大學組織의 體制論的 分析을 위한 理論的 基礎 = 7
• 第1節 大學行政의 意義 및 特性 = 7
• 1. 大學行政의 意義 = 7
• 2. 大學行政의 特性 = 8
• 第2節 組織의 體制論的 分析 = 10
• 1. 組織의 環境體制 = 14
• 2. 組織의 理念·目標體制 = 17
• 3. 組織의 構造體制 = 18
• 4. 組織의 心理·社會體制 = 20
• 5. 組織의 技術體制 = 23
• 6. 組織의 管理體制 = 25
• 第3章 韓國大學行政體制의 實態分析 = 28
• 第1節 韓國大學의 環境體制 = 28
• 1. 法律的 條件 = 28
• 2. 生態的 條件 = 33
• 3. 政治的 條件 = 36
• 第2節 韓國大學의 理念·目標體制 = 38
• 1. 大學의 質 = 39
• 2. 大學의 自律性 保障 = 41
• 3. 學問의 自由保障 = 42
• 第3節 韓國大學의 構造體制 = 43
• 1. 理事會 = 44
• 2. 總長 = 45
• 第4節 韓國大學의 心理·社會體制 = 47
• 1. 大學內部의 構成要素 = 47
• 2. 敎授와 大學行政家間의 役割葛藤 = 48
• 第5節 韓國大學의 技術體制 = 50
• 1. 大學事務職의 機能 = 50
• 2. 大學事務職의 專門化의 必要性 = 52
• 第6節 韓國大學의 管理體制 = 54
• 1. 意義 = 54
• 2. 自律的 管理體制의 必要性 = 55
• 第4章 韓國大學行政體制의 問題點과 改善方向 = 57
• 第1節 韓國大學의 環境體制 = 57
• 1. 問題點 = 57
• 2. 改善方向 = 58
• 第2節 韓國大學의 理念·目標體制 = 61
• 1. 大學理念의 缺如 = 61
• 2. 大學理念의 回復原則 = 62
• 第3節 韓國大學의 構造體制 = 63
• 1. 理事會의 問題點 및 改善方向 = 63
• 2. 바람직한 大學總長像 = 64
• 第4節 韓國大學의 心理·社會體制 = 66
• 1. 民主性과 能率性의 調和 = 66
• 2. 敎授와 大學行政家間의 役割葛藤의 解決方向 = 66
• 第5節 韓國大學의 技術體制 = 67
• 1. 行政事務의 改革方向 = 67
• 2. 大學事務要員의 專門性 昻揚方法 = 68
• 第6節 韓國大學의 管理體制 = 69
• 1. 評議員會의 問題點 = 69
• 2. 評議員會의 改善方向 = 70
• 第5章 結論 = 72
• 參考文獻 = 75
• 英文抄錄 = 81