중국에서의 상사중재판정 집행에 관한 동향과 제도개선 연구 : 외국투자자 관점을 중심으로 = The Current Status and New Regulatory Arrangements of the Enforcement of Commercial Arbitration Awards in China from the Foreign Investor's Perspective

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The enforcement of commercial arbitration awards in the People's Republic of China is one the controversial obstacles faced by foreign investors in China. The foreign investor will fail to enforce the arbitration award, if the Chinese court refuses the enforcement in China, even if the arbitration tribunal rules the award in favor of foreign investor who is in dispute with Chinese partners. In Korea, we have not many researches in the enforcement of foreign related awards and awards ruled by other jurisdiction. In recent times, Professor Kyung-Ja Cha(2005) and Professor Sun-Jeong Kim(2008) analyzed the enforcement of arbitration awards in China. Professor Kyung-Ja Cha(2005) reports the details of the enforcement statistics of CIETAC during 1990s. Professor Sun-Jeong Kim(2008) analyzed the obstacles of the enforcement of foreign related awards in China. This paper extends their researches in the field of the enforcement of arbitration awards in China. First, this paper extends Professor Kyung-Ja Cha(2005)'s study by introducing the Chinese enforcement situation during the period of 2000-2007. Second, this paper extends Professor Sunjung Kim(2008) emphasizes the local protectionism and the weakness of judiciary as key factors of obstacles to enforce the foreign related awards in People's Republic of China. This paper, additionally, highlights the role of the Guanxi and the antagonism of court toward arbitration institution to enforce the foreign related awards in People's Republic of China. Third, this study provides the recent developments of Supreme People's Court(SPC)'s rules to narrow down the gap between the practices of international arbitration and those of People's Republic of China. The Implications of this study are as follows. First, it is desirable for foreign investors to appoint the CIETAC or BAC as the arbitration commission in China. Second, the local competent attorney is the best choice to solve the respondent's insolvency in China. Third, foreign investors is required to monitor the provisions on the electronic instruments such as EDI and Email in Chinese law.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 중국최고인민법원, "중재법적용에 관한 몇 가지 문제점에 대한 해석"

2 윤충원, "중국의 중재법상 중재기관 약정과 관련한 중재합의 유효요건에 관한 사례연구" 한국무역학회 32 (32): 65-92, 2007

3 차경자, "중국의 섭외 및 외국중재판정 강제집행제도 연구" 한국중재학회 15 (15): 263-292, 2005

4 김선정, "중국에 있어서 외국중재판정의 승인 및 집행 거절 사유인 공서와 법의 지배" 한국중재학회 18 (18): 23-50, 2008

5 전대규, "중국민사소송법" 박영사 2008

6 신군재, "중국 중재제도의 특성에 관한 사례 연구" 한국무역학회 29 (29): 211-230, 2004

7 양소검, "중국 수출기업의 꽌시에 관한 연구" 강원대학교 2009

8 신창섭, "우리나라와 중국 중재법에서 중재판정의 취소사유에 관한 연구" 한국중재학회 16 (16): 51-88, 2006

9 김경배, "외국중재판정의 집행판결에서 나타난 집행거부사유에 관한 고찰" 한국중재학회 14 (14): 213-244, 2004

10 중국최고인민법원, "섭외중재 및 외국중재와 관련된 몇 가지 문제점들에 대한 인민법원의처리에 관한 통지"

11 목영준, "상사중재법론" 박영사 2001

12 하충룡, "뉴욕협약상 외국중재판정에 대한 미국법원의 해석" 한국중재학회 16 (16): 121-150, 2006

13 Yu, X, "Urgent Need for Overhaul of Judiciary" South Morning Post 10-,

14 D'Souza, Fiona, "The Recognition and Enforcement of Commercial Arbitral Awards in the People's Republic of China" 30 : 1318-1359, 2007

15 Thorp, Peter, "The PRC Arbitration Law: Problems and Prospects for Amendment" 24 (24): 607-622, 2007

16 Lin, Mark, "Supreme People's Court Rules on PRC Arbitration Issues" 24 (24): 597-605, 2007

17 Chen, Lumming, "Some Reflections on International Commercial Arbitration in China" 13 (13): 121-149, 1996

18 Peerenboom, Randall, "Seek Truth from Facts: An Empirical Study of Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in the PRC" 49 : 249-327, 2001

19 Yuan Kong, "Revision of China's 1994 Arbitration Act-Some Suggestions from A Judicalization Perspective" 22 (22): 323-330, 2005

20 Fan, Y, "Questioning Guanxi: Definition, Classification and Implications" 543-561, 2002

21 Clarke, Donald, "Power and Politics in the Chinese Court System: The Enforcement of Civil Judgement" 10 : 1-92, 1996

22 Guvenli, Turgut, "Perception and Management of Legal Issues in China by US Firms" 32 : 161-181, 2003

23 Wing, Carlos, "Lawyers in the People's Republic of China: A Study of Commitment and Professionalization" 53 : 443-455, 2005

24 Wang, David, "Judical Reform in China: Improving Arbitration Award Enforcement by Establishing a Federal Court System" 48 : 2008

25 Chi, Manjiao, "Is the Chinese Arbitration Act Truly Arbitration-Friendly: Determining the Validity of Arbitration Agreement under Chinese Law" 4 (4): 104-120, 2008

26 An, Chen, "Is Enforcement of Arbitral Awards An Issue for Consideration and Improvement? - The Case of China in Making the Most of International Investment Agreement: A Common Agenda" 2005

27 Kaufmann-Kohler, "Integrating Mediation into Arbitration: Why It Works in China" 25 (25): 479-492, 2008

28 Fei, Langfang, "Implementation of the New York Convention in China: A Case Study" 4 (4): 123-136, 2008

29 Sheehy, Benedict, "Fundamental Conflicting Views of the Rule of the Law in China and the West and Implications for Commercial Disputes" 26 : 225-266, 2006

30 Reinstein, Ellen, "Finding a Happy Ending for Foreign Investors: The Enforcement of Arbitration Awards in the People's Republic of China" 16 : 37-72, 2005

31 Unkovic Dennis, "Enforcing Arbitration Awards in China" 59 (59): 68-72, 2005

32 Hu, Li, "Enforcement of the International Commercial Arbitration in the People's Republic of China" 16 (16): 1-40, 1999

33 Peerenboom, Randall, "Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in China" 8-12, 2001

34 Wang Wenying, "Distinct Features of Arbitration in China" 23 (23): 581-596, 2006

35 Johnson, Graeme, "Bridging the Gap Between Western and Chinese Arbitration Systems" 24 (24): 565-580, 2007

36 Tao, Jingzhou, "Articles 16 and 18 of the PRC Arbitration Law: The Great Wall of China for Foreign Arbitration Institutions" 23 (23): 309-326, 2007

37 Sanger, Kathryn, "Arbitration in Greater China: Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan" 24 (24): 651-671, 2007

38 Yuen Peter, "Arbitration Clauses in a Chinese Context" 24 (24): 581-596, 2007

39 윤진기, "2005년 CIETAC 중재규칙 개정과 중국 중재법상의 문제점 개선" 한국중재학회 16 (16): 91-125, 2006