RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      노동의 유연안정화 정책이 노동시장에 미치는 영향분석 -OECD 국가를 중심으로- = The Impact of Labor Flexicurity Policy on the Labor Market Performance in the OECD countries

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82491982

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The outstanding performance of some nations in Central and Northern Europe such as Denmark and the Netherlands in the labor market is much indebted to their policy to help labor flexicurity. In this study, the possibility of replicating the Dutch or Danish performance in the labor market is explored in case of adopting such policy in the 22 OECD countries. If implementing the flexicurity policy in the 22 member countries of the OECD leads to strong performance in the labor market, this policy can be globally shared as universal labor policy to provide a win-win situation among the labor, management and the authorities on the matter, paving the way for replacing the Anglo-Saxon policy characterized by high flexibility and low security, or the European alternative with a lower level of flexibility and a higher level of security. According to findings from our research, flexicurity policy can not produce any` tangible accomplishments in the labor market by only itself. Therefore, we may safely reach the conclusion that flexicurity policy has a limited positive influence on the labor market of some northern or central European countries. Given the striking difference in inherent conditions between such European countries and OECD countries, it is not sensible for OECD nations to adopt labor policy in the direction of flexicurity.
      번역하기

      The outstanding performance of some nations in Central and Northern Europe such as Denmark and the Netherlands in the labor market is much indebted to their policy to help labor flexicurity. In this study, the possibility of replicating the Dutch or D...

      The outstanding performance of some nations in Central and Northern Europe such as Denmark and the Netherlands in the labor market is much indebted to their policy to help labor flexicurity. In this study, the possibility of replicating the Dutch or Danish performance in the labor market is explored in case of adopting such policy in the 22 OECD countries. If implementing the flexicurity policy in the 22 member countries of the OECD leads to strong performance in the labor market, this policy can be globally shared as universal labor policy to provide a win-win situation among the labor, management and the authorities on the matter, paving the way for replacing the Anglo-Saxon policy characterized by high flexibility and low security, or the European alternative with a lower level of flexibility and a higher level of security. According to findings from our research, flexicurity policy can not produce any` tangible accomplishments in the labor market by only itself. Therefore, we may safely reach the conclusion that flexicurity policy has a limited positive influence on the labor market of some northern or central European countries. Given the striking difference in inherent conditions between such European countries and OECD countries, it is not sensible for OECD nations to adopt labor policy in the direction of flexicurity.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 OECD, OECD 2004

      2 OECD, OECD 2008

      3 OECD, OECD 2007

      4 OECD, 2009

      5 박성준, "한국 노동시장의 유연안정성 현황 및 과제" 한국경제연구원 2008

      6 정희정, "유연안정성의 나라, 네덜란드의 노동시장 유연성과 안정성 실태" 한국노동연구원 5 (5): 2007

      7 정희정, "유럽연합의 유연안정성 전략: ‘유연안정성(flexicurity)의 공동 원칙을 향하여’: 네덜란드" 한국노동연구원 5 (5): 2007

      8 황수경, "덴마크의 유연안정성(flexicurity) 모형" 한국노동연구원 2 (2): 2004

      9 정원호, "덴마크의 유연안정성 정책에 관한 고찰" 한국EU학회 10 (10): 41-73, 2005

      10 윤진호, "덴마크의 유연안정성 모델에 대한 평가와 한국에의 시사점" 한국노총 중앙연구원

      1 OECD, OECD 2004

      2 OECD, OECD 2008

      3 OECD, OECD 2007

      4 OECD, 2009

      5 박성준, "한국 노동시장의 유연안정성 현황 및 과제" 한국경제연구원 2008

      6 정희정, "유연안정성의 나라, 네덜란드의 노동시장 유연성과 안정성 실태" 한국노동연구원 5 (5): 2007

      7 정희정, "유럽연합의 유연안정성 전략: ‘유연안정성(flexicurity)의 공동 원칙을 향하여’: 네덜란드" 한국노동연구원 5 (5): 2007

      8 황수경, "덴마크의 유연안정성(flexicurity) 모형" 한국노동연구원 2 (2): 2004

      9 정원호, "덴마크의 유연안정성 정책에 관한 고찰" 한국EU학회 10 (10): 41-73, 2005

      10 윤진호, "덴마크의 유연안정성 모델에 대한 평가와 한국에의 시사점" 한국노총 중앙연구원

      11 정희정, "덴마크와 네덜란드의 유연안정성 모델 비교" 한국노동연구원 6 (6): 2008

      12 정원호, "네덜란드와 덴마크의 유연안정성 비교" 한국노동연구원 3 (3): 2005

      13 Eriksson, T, "Wage and Labor Mobility in Denmark, 1980-2000" 2007

      14 Nickell, S, "Unemployment and Labor Market Rigidities: Europe and North America" 11 (11): 55-74, 1997

      15 Gaard, S, "Two Decades of Structural Reform in Denmark: A Review" Ministry of Finance, Government of Denmark 2005

      16 Tros, F, "Towards ”Flexicurity” in Policies for Older Workers in EU Countries?" Utrecht

      17 Free Institute for Economic Research, "The Myth of the Scandinavian Model"

      18 Madsen, P. T, "The Most Quoted Danish Economic Expert and the Welfare State: Bias in Practice" Bergen 2008

      19 Bredgaard, T, "The Flexible Danish Labour Market-A Review" Aalborg Universitet 2005

      20 Abrahamson, P, "The Dutch and Danish Miracles Revisited: A Critical Discussion of Activation Policies in Two Small Welfare States" 37 (37): 288-304, 2003

      21 Heckman, J, "The Cost of Job Security Regulation: Evidence from Latin American Labor Markets" 2000

      22 Wilthagen, T, "The Concept of ‘Flexicurity’: A New Approach to Regulating Employment and Labour Markets" 10 (10): 166-186, 2004

      23 European Commission, "Termination of Employment Relationships: Legal Situation in the Member States of the European Union" 2006

      24 OECD, "OECD Economic Outlook: Interim Report" OECD 2009

      25 Tangian, A. S, "Liberal and Trade-unionist Concepts of Flexicurity: Modelling in Application to 16 European Countries" WSI in der Hans Böckler Stiftung 2004

      26 Kim, Hyungkee, "Labor Market Institutions for Economic Growth and Social Cohesion: Comparative Analysis of the U.K., Germany, and Denmark" 8 (8): 93-124, 2008

      27 Vandenberg, P, "Is Asia Adopting Flexicurity? A Survey of Employment Policies in Six Countries. in: Economic and Labour Market Papers" International Labour Office

      28 Madsen, P. K, "How Can It Possibly Fly?: The Paradox of a Dynamic Labour Market in a Scandinavian Welfare State. in: National Identity and the Varieties of Capitalism: The Danish Experience" DJØF Publishing 2006

      29 Madsen, P. K, "Flexicurity―A new Perspective on Labour Markets and Welfare States in Europe" Brussels 2006

      30 Andersen, T. M, "Flexicurity: Labour Market Performance in Denmark" 53 (53): 389-429, 2007

      31 Free Institute for Economic Research, "Flexicurity: A Modern Danish Fairy-Tale: How in the Country of the Blind the One-eyed Man Became King?"

      32 Keune, M, "Flexicurity: A Contested Concept at the Core of the European Labour Market Debate" 43 (43): 92-98, 2008

      33 Bredgaard, T, "Flexicurity and Atypical Employment in Denmark"

      34 Keller, B, "Flexicurity - Wie lassen sich Flexibilitt und soziale sicherheit vereinbaren" 90-106, 2004

      35 Tangian, A. S, "European Flexicurity: Concepts, Methodology, and Policies" 13 (13): 551-573, 2007

      36 Tangian, A. S, "European Flexicurity: Concepts (Operational Definitions), Methodology (Monitoring Instruments), and Policies (Consistent Implementations)" WSI in der Hans Böckler Stiftung 2006

      37 Becker, U, "Employment ‘Miracles’: A Critical Comparison of the Dutch, Scandinavian, Australian and Irish Cases versus Germany and the US" Amsterdam University Press 2005

      38 Green-Pedersen, C, "Employment and Unemployment in Denmark and Sweden: Success or Failure for the Universal Welfare Model?. in: Employment ‘Miracles’: A Critical Comparison of the Dutch, Scandinavian, Australian and Irish Cases versus Germany and the US" Amsterdam University Press 65-85, 2005

      39 OECD, "Employment Protection Regulation and Labour Market Performance" 2004

      40 Bradley, D, "Employment Performances in OECD Countries: A Test of Neo-liberal and Institutionalist Hypotheses" 40 (40): 1-25, 2007

      41 Larsen, C. A, "Employment Miracles and Active Labour Market Policy-A Critical Review of Danish Evaluations" Aalborg University: CCWS 2000

      42 Kim, Hyungkee, "Economic Performance in Three Labor Market Models: Elexibility, Rigidity, and Flexicurity" 한국노동경제학 2009

      43 "EIRO. Denmark: Industrial Relations Profile. Eurofound"

      44 Goul Andersen, J, "Different Routes to Improve Employment in Europe. in: Labour Market and Social Protection Reforms in International Perspective" Asgate 2002

      45 Cohn, J, "Denmark, the Model" New Republic 2007

      46 Tangian, A. S, "Defining the Flexicurity Index in Application to European Countries" 2004

      47 Hall, P. A, "Danish Capitalism in Comparative Perspective. in: National Identity and the Varieties of Capotalism: The Danish Experience" McGill-Queen’s University Press 441-452, 2006

      48 Jespersen, S, "Costs and Benefits of Danish Active labor Market Programs" 15 (15): 2008

      49 Mailand, M, "Corporatism in Denmark and Norway: Yet Another Century of Scandinavian Corporatism?. Contribution to Special Issue on the Nordic Countries of WSI Mitteilungen- Monatszeitshrift des Wirtscharfts- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Instituts in der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung"

      50 European Commission, "2005 Adopted Employment Guidelines 2005-2008" Employment and Social Affairs 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2000-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.84 0.84 0.86
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.88 0.96 1.517 0.31
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼