RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      1950년대 한국군의 미국 군사유학 시행과 그 영향

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101857208

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Since the end of WWII, in order to prevent the USSR’s expansion, the U.S. government had provided military assistances to Free World countries. With a view to maximizing the effects of the military assistance, the US government intended to ‘Standardize’ the allied countries’ military systems. Specifically, the military education programs at the U.S. military institutions was considered as an important prerequisite for the success of the military assistance. Meanwhile, in 1951 the Korean War had entered into the phase of a cease-fire agreement. The U.S. government was interested in preventing the Korean War from expanding to WWIII and establishing its dignity in Asia and for this purpose was in need to intervene in the operation of the Korean military. Simultaneously, the Korean government was in dire need to import the advanced U.S. military system in a short period. Likewise the massive dispatch of Korean Army officers to U.S. military institutions was undertaken in furtherance of the mutual interest.
      The U.S. government arranged the Korean Army officers to participate in the Special Allied Officers Course, an amended education program based on the Officer’s Basic Course. The Special Allied Officers Course included basic studies on military etiquette, commandership, leadership etc. In sum, the U.S. government provided that the young Korean Army officers would learn not only the military knowledge but also the customs and norms of the US officer corps, thereby embodying the ‘American style military concept’. The Korean Army officers who participated in the program aforesaid understood that the teaching methods of the US military education system are ‘reasonable’. And the Korean military appointed those officers to positions in charge of education and training thereby inducing them to propagate the knowledge and techniques. And their technological and administrative know-hows and skills were introduced to the Korean military’s branch education, and subsequently propagated into the Korean society.
      The massive military education in the United States had resulted in the standardization of the Korean military system based on the U.S. system. As the Korean officers’expertise grew further in late 1950s, however, they began to perceive that the U.S. military education system may not perfectly capture the requirements of the Korean military education suited to local characteristics. In the Korean military history, this was a time marked with overwhelming American influences and yet the Korean government and military was recognizing their initiative roles as shown in their responses repeating accommodation and struggles vis-à-vis the intellectual and moral hegemony of the United States.
      번역하기

      Since the end of WWII, in order to prevent the USSR’s expansion, the U.S. government had provided military assistances to Free World countries. With a view to maximizing the effects of the military assistance, the US government intended to ‘Standa...

      Since the end of WWII, in order to prevent the USSR’s expansion, the U.S. government had provided military assistances to Free World countries. With a view to maximizing the effects of the military assistance, the US government intended to ‘Standardize’ the allied countries’ military systems. Specifically, the military education programs at the U.S. military institutions was considered as an important prerequisite for the success of the military assistance. Meanwhile, in 1951 the Korean War had entered into the phase of a cease-fire agreement. The U.S. government was interested in preventing the Korean War from expanding to WWIII and establishing its dignity in Asia and for this purpose was in need to intervene in the operation of the Korean military. Simultaneously, the Korean government was in dire need to import the advanced U.S. military system in a short period. Likewise the massive dispatch of Korean Army officers to U.S. military institutions was undertaken in furtherance of the mutual interest.
      The U.S. government arranged the Korean Army officers to participate in the Special Allied Officers Course, an amended education program based on the Officer’s Basic Course. The Special Allied Officers Course included basic studies on military etiquette, commandership, leadership etc. In sum, the U.S. government provided that the young Korean Army officers would learn not only the military knowledge but also the customs and norms of the US officer corps, thereby embodying the ‘American style military concept’. The Korean Army officers who participated in the program aforesaid understood that the teaching methods of the US military education system are ‘reasonable’. And the Korean military appointed those officers to positions in charge of education and training thereby inducing them to propagate the knowledge and techniques. And their technological and administrative know-hows and skills were introduced to the Korean military’s branch education, and subsequently propagated into the Korean society.
      The massive military education in the United States had resulted in the standardization of the Korean military system based on the U.S. system. As the Korean officers’expertise grew further in late 1950s, however, they began to perceive that the U.S. military education system may not perfectly capture the requirements of the Korean military education suited to local characteristics. In the Korean military history, this was a time marked with overwhelming American influences and yet the Korean government and military was recognizing their initiative roles as shown in their responses repeating accommodation and struggles vis-à-vis the intellectual and moral hegemony of the United States.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 머리말
      • 2. 미국의 한국군 ‘표준화’ 구상과 방안
      • 3. 한국군의 유학생 선발과 ‘특별반’ 이수
      • 4. 한국군의 유학 이수자 활용과 그 영향
      • 5. 맺음말
      • 1. 머리말
      • 2. 미국의 한국군 ‘표준화’ 구상과 방안
      • 3. 한국군의 유학생 선발과 ‘특별반’ 이수
      • 4. 한국군의 유학 이수자 활용과 그 영향
      • 5. 맺음말
      • 〈ABSTRAC〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 張昌國, "陸士卒業生" 中央日報社 363-, 1984

      2 "留學將校私用費援助獲得의 件(大秘指國防第5號,1953.3.20)"

      3 조성훈, "한미군사관계사의 형성과 발전" 국방부 군사편찬연구소 161-, 2008

      4 권자경, "한국전쟁·전후복구와 자원동원 -국방분야 인적자원추출제도의 형성과 제도화-" 한국거버넌스학회 18 (18): 275-301, 2011

      5 나종남, "한국전쟁 중 한국 육군의 재편성과 증강, 1951-53" 국방부군사편찬연구소 (63) : 213-266, 2007

      6 백종천, "한국의 군대와 사회" 나남출판 1994

      7 국사편찬위원회, "한국군 초기 역사를 듣다:군사영어학교 출신 예비역 장성의 구술" 334-, 2012

      8 김증기, "한국 군사사" 경남대학교 출판부 304-, 2011

      9 육군본부, "포병과 6‧25전쟁 증언록" 298-, 2012

      10 박원구, "통합 교육훈련에 대한 소고"

      1 張昌國, "陸士卒業生" 中央日報社 363-, 1984

      2 "留學將校私用費援助獲得의 件(大秘指國防第5號,1953.3.20)"

      3 조성훈, "한미군사관계사의 형성과 발전" 국방부 군사편찬연구소 161-, 2008

      4 권자경, "한국전쟁·전후복구와 자원동원 -국방분야 인적자원추출제도의 형성과 제도화-" 한국거버넌스학회 18 (18): 275-301, 2011

      5 나종남, "한국전쟁 중 한국 육군의 재편성과 증강, 1951-53" 국방부군사편찬연구소 (63) : 213-266, 2007

      6 백종천, "한국의 군대와 사회" 나남출판 1994

      7 국사편찬위원회, "한국군 초기 역사를 듣다:군사영어학교 출신 예비역 장성의 구술" 334-, 2012

      8 김증기, "한국 군사사" 경남대학교 출판부 304-, 2011

      9 육군본부, "포병과 6‧25전쟁 증언록" 298-, 2012

      10 박원구, "통합 교육훈련에 대한 소고"

      11 박동찬, "주한미군사고문단(KMAG)의 조직과 활동(1948~53)" 한양대학교 대학원 2011

      12 이계홍, "장군이 된 이등병" 화남 221-223, 2005

      13 陸軍本部, "육군발전사 제2권:1953.7.27~1962.12.31" 139-144, 1970

      14 김종구, "육군대학 교육과 관련성 있는 육군의 당면문제" 陸軍大學 (24) : 1963

      15 송택구, "육군교육의 전망"

      16 김영선, "백마고지의 광영" 팔복원 114-, 1997

      17 백행걸, "미완성의 성취" 팔복원 87-, 1994

      18 허은, "미국의 헤게모니와 한국 민족주의 : 냉전시대(1945~1965)문화적 경계의 구축과 균열의 동반" 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 2008

      19 그렉 브라진스키, "대한민국 만들기,1945~1987:경제 성장과 민주화,그리고 미국" 책과함께 160-167, 2011

      20 정승화, "대한민국 군인 정승화" Human& Books 235-, 2002

      21 "구술 - 황규만, 신위영, 박경석, 박보희, 장정열, 정우봉, 김운용"

      22 육군본부, "교총사 제2집" 149-, 1960

      23 "獎學金留學生派遣에 關한 件(大秘指文外第7號,1952.9.)"

      24 "海外派遣公務員等公的外國旅行者의 歸還報告書作成에 關한 件,1953.4. 25)"

      25 "民, 軍留學生雜費問題의 件(大秘指財務第14號,1952.12.26)"

      26 채명신, "死線을 넘고 넘어" 매일경제신문사 291-293, 1994

      27 이건영, "敗者의 勝利" 進明文化社 54-56, 1996

      28 "將校訓練에 관한 件(大秘指國防第44號,1951.5.22)"

      29 "將校米國麴에 派遣의 件(大秘指國防第47號,1951.5.30)"

      30 JohnJ. Johnson, "The Role of the Military in Under developed Countries" Princeton University Press 1962

      31 Robert H. Connery, "The Mutual Defense Assistance Program" XLV (XLV): 328-329, 1951

      32 Ernest W. Lefever, "The Military Assistance Training Program" 424 : 92-, 1976

      33 Lyman L. Lemnitzer, "The Foreign Military Aid Program" 23 (23): 438-440, 1950

      34 The Infantry School, Fort Bennin, "Manual For Tactical Officers"

      35 Jong-nam Na, "Making Cold War Soldiers:The Americanization of the South Korean Army,1945~1955" University of North Carolina 1955

      36 "FRUS, Vol.Ⅶ" 1075-1076, 1949

      37 "FRUS, Vol.Ⅶ" 1084-1085, 1951

      38 James K. Wilson, Jr, "Development of Requirements for the Mutual Defense Assistance Program" Industrial College of the Armed Forces 1954

      39 이치업, "Call Me “Speedy Lee” 번개장군" 원민 168-, 2001

      40 The Adjutant General’s Office, Department of the Army, "Brochure for General James A. Van Fleet"

      41 Howard Jones, "America’s Global Strategy and theTruman Doctrine in Greece" Oxford University Press 1989

      42 노영기, "5‧16쿠데타 주체세력 분석" (57) : 2001

      43 도진순, "1960년대 한국의 근대화와 지식인" 선인 2004

      44 曺二鉉, "1948-1949년 주한미군의 철수와 주한미군사고문단의 활동" 서울大學校 大學院 1995

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2017-10-23 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Military History Institute, MND KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-06-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> military history KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.69 0.69 0.62
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.63 0.6 1.024 0.34
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼