RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    설계의 본질에 기반한 교수설계의 정체성 성찰 = Reflections on Instructional Design as a Designing

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959660

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to reflect on the nature of instructional design as a designing, that is derived from the point of an argument that instructional design should be congruent with the nature of design. The nature of design is comprehensively analyzed by description of design(definitions and characteristics of design), prescription of an ideal design process or models, observation of the reality of design activity and reflection on fundamental concept or method of design which from various design fields` literature. To analyze whether instructional design is congruent with the nature of design, firstly, existing instructional design models are classified according to the assumption and theoretical foundation of instructional design. Secondly, the notable features of individual perspectives on instructional design process or method are organized by examining their assumption, theoretical foundation, and representative model. Finally, the study does analyze whether instructional design perspectives or models truly reflect on the nature of design or not, with regard to analysis of design problem, synthesis of design solutions, evaluation of design solutions, and overall design processes. As a result, from the pragmatic, integrative, communicative, creative perspectives of instructional design, it can be concluded that instructional design is truly congruent with the nature of design, except rational view. It is useful to portray various perspectives of instructional design along a continuum from purely rational to purely creative, according to a degree of reflection on the nature of design. The fact that these four alternatives are congruent with the nature of design is the result of reconsideration, revisit, and enhancement of traditional rational instructional design model based on systems approach. These new models emphasize that instructional design process is reiterative, recursive, concurrent focused on flexibility, collaboration, and non-linearity.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to reflect on the nature of instructional design as a designing, that is derived from the point of an argument that instructional design should be congruent with the nature of design. The nature of design is comprehensivel...

    The purpose of this study is to reflect on the nature of instructional design as a designing, that is derived from the point of an argument that instructional design should be congruent with the nature of design. The nature of design is comprehensively analyzed by description of design(definitions and characteristics of design), prescription of an ideal design process or models, observation of the reality of design activity and reflection on fundamental concept or method of design which from various design fields` literature. To analyze whether instructional design is congruent with the nature of design, firstly, existing instructional design models are classified according to the assumption and theoretical foundation of instructional design. Secondly, the notable features of individual perspectives on instructional design process or method are organized by examining their assumption, theoretical foundation, and representative model. Finally, the study does analyze whether instructional design perspectives or models truly reflect on the nature of design or not, with regard to analysis of design problem, synthesis of design solutions, evaluation of design solutions, and overall design processes. As a result, from the pragmatic, integrative, communicative, creative perspectives of instructional design, it can be concluded that instructional design is truly congruent with the nature of design, except rational view. It is useful to portray various perspectives of instructional design along a continuum from purely rational to purely creative, according to a degree of reflection on the nature of design. The fact that these four alternatives are congruent with the nature of design is the result of reconsideration, revisit, and enhancement of traditional rational instructional design model based on systems approach. These new models emphasize that instructional design process is reiterative, recursive, concurrent focused on flexibility, collaboration, and non-linearity.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "체제성과 체계성의 논쟁을 넘어서 이중구조 교수체제 모델의 탐색" 18 (18): 157-174, 2002

    2 "체제과학에 비추어본 교육공학의 궤도이탈" 13 (13): 211-240, 1997

    3 "수업체제설계(ISD) 탐구논리와 실천논리" 서울: 교육과학사 1998

    4 "설계이론과 수업체제설계" 6 (6): 109-129, 2000

    5 "설계 예술적 관점에서 본 수업설계자 육성방안 제고" 12 (12): 113-141, 1996

    6 "생산물 환경과 사회적 행위" 서울: 조형교육 189-221, 1995

    7 "비구조적 문제상황 이해를 위한 체제-해석적 수업체제설계 모델 개발" 18 (18): 249-295, 2002

    8 "디자인사 연구" 서울: 조형교육 2004

    9 "디자인 방법론 연구" 1992

    10 "교육공학의 간학문성과 발전방향" 16 (16): 3-25, 2000

    1 "체제성과 체계성의 논쟁을 넘어서 이중구조 교수체제 모델의 탐색" 18 (18): 157-174, 2002

    2 "체제과학에 비추어본 교육공학의 궤도이탈" 13 (13): 211-240, 1997

    3 "수업체제설계(ISD) 탐구논리와 실천논리" 서울: 교육과학사 1998

    4 "설계이론과 수업체제설계" 6 (6): 109-129, 2000

    5 "설계 예술적 관점에서 본 수업설계자 육성방안 제고" 12 (12): 113-141, 1996

    6 "생산물 환경과 사회적 행위" 서울: 조형교육 189-221, 1995

    7 "비구조적 문제상황 이해를 위한 체제-해석적 수업체제설계 모델 개발" 18 (18): 249-295, 2002

    8 "디자인사 연구" 서울: 조형교육 2004

    9 "디자인 방법론 연구" 1992

    10 "교육공학의 간학문성과 발전방향" 16 (16): 3-25, 2000

    11 "교육공학과 체제학" 16 (16): 95-121, 2000

    12 "교육공학과 설계학" 16 (16): 127-147, 2000

    13 "what can we learn from Habermas’ theory Presentation to the Association of Educational Communications and Technology" 1991

    14 "What can we learn from chaos theory? An alternative approach to instructional design" 17-32, 1994

    15 "User-design in the creation of human learning systems" 45 (45): 5-22, 1997

    16 "Two traditions of systems thinking in instructional development" 35 (35): 40-42, 1995

    17 "Two theories of design and instructional design Presentation to the Association of Educational Communications and Technology" 1991

    18 "Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions" Jossey-Bass 1987

    19 "The uses of illuminative semiotic and postmodern criticism as modes of inquiry in Educational Technology" 1991

    20 "The state of the art in design methods" 143-147, 1973

    21 "The sciences of artificial" MIT Press 1981

    22 "The sciences of artificial" MIT Press 1969

    23 "The psychological study of design" 5-11, 1979

    24 "The necessity of being un-disciplined and out of control" 22-29, 1994

    25 "The maturing of constructivist instructional design some basic principles that can guide practice" 40 (40): 5-16, 2000

    26 "The logic of scientific discovery" 1959

    27 "The logic of design and question of value The architecture of form" Cambridge University Press 1-40, 1976

    28 "The logic of design Development in design methodology" In Cross 256-276, 19841984

    29 "The liminal qualities of anthropological field notes Journal of Contemporary Ethnography" 8-43, 1990

    30 "The impact of student learning research and the nature of design on ID fundamentals" Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications 99-112, 1995

    31 "The data in design protocols" NY: John Wiley & Sons 225-252, 1996

    32 "The case for linear instructional design and development: A commentary on models, challenges, and myths" 36 (36): 5-23, 1996

    33 "The attack on ISD" 37 (37): 42-53, 2000

    34 "Systems analysis of the first and second generations" bedrifts oko (bedrifts oko): 390-396, 1972

    35 "Survey of instructional development models (4th ed.)" Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources 2002

    36 "Rhetoric, humanism and design" 서울: 조형교육 61-115, 1995

    37 "Paradigms in theory and practice of education and training design" 52 (52): 69-89, 2004

    38 "Notes on the synthesis of form" Harvard University Press 1964

    39 "New alternatives for effective education and training American Council on Education and Macmillan Publishing Company" 1989

    40 "Liminal states in designing" 30-45, 1994

    41 "Investigating design: A review of forty years of design research" 20 (20): 16-29, 2004

    42 "Instructional systems development: A 30 year retrospective" 45 (45): 5-21, 2005

    43 "ISD: The ‘S’ Is For Systems!" 44 (44): 13-19, 2004

    44 "How designers think: The design process demystified(3rd ed.)" London: Architectural Press 1997

    45 "Graphic design as a audiovisualistic rhetoric" 서울: 조형교육 8-18, 2000

    46 "Engineering design method: Strategies for product design(3rd ed.)" Chichester: Wiley 2000

    47 "Discovering design: Explorations in design studies" Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1995

    48 "Different method for different outcomes" 5-11, 1994

    49 "Development in design methodology" In Cross k (k): 245-264, 19841984

    50 "Development in design methodology" In Cross 135-144, 19841984

    51 "Development in design methodology" 1984

    52 "Designerly ways of knowing" 221-227, 1982

    53 "Design" 525-535, 1999

    54 "Decision-making in urban design Development in design methodology" In Cross 107-122, 19841984

    55 "Critical analysis of instructional design" 1995

    56 "Concurrent design of performance systems" 44 (44): 31-35, 2004

    57 "Comparing paradigms for describing design activity" NY: John Wiley & Sons 253-270, 1996

    58 "Applying cognitive strategies to instructional design" 41 (41): 8-14, 2002

    59 "An exploration of the design process" 115-119, 1979

    60 "Adoption of learning technologies Toward new frameworks for understanding the link between design and use" 39 (39): 12-16, 1999

    61 "Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environment" 47 (47): 61-79, 1999

    62 "Activity Theory as a Framework for Project Work in Learning Environment" 40 (40): 33-37, 2000

    63 "A-Maze: An instructional design model" 1997

    64 "A recursive, reflective instructional design model based on constructivist- interpretivist theory" 35 (35): 5-23, 1995

    65 "A layers of negotiation model for designing constructivist learning materials" 36 (36): 39-48, 1996

    66 "A layers of necessity instructional development model" 77-85, 1990

    67 "A history of design methodology Design methodology and relationship with science" Kluwer Academic Publisher 15-27, 1993

    68 "A comparative analysis of models instructional design" 133-155, 1991

    69 "A General Set of Procedures for Constructivist Instructional Design: The New R2D2 Model" 40 (40): 5-20, 2000

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼