兼山 兪肅基의 詩文 考察

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Gyeom-san Sook-Gi Yoo(1696~1752) was not paid attention as a high-ranking official or a writer, but he was a distinguished scholar and poet in the middle Chosun Dynasty. He comprehend the realities around himself and lived as a classical scholar through his life carefully. This study introduces Gyeom-san to the academic community, to establish his literary value of poetry and prose, and to formulate a significance and status in the history of Korean literature. The results of this study are as followings ;
Gyeom-san wrote traditional Chinese poetry in various changes arisen in the 18th century. As a result of the analysis in his Chinese poetry, I found his feature as a Confucian scholar. His Chinese poetry was formulated with retirement-oriented life absorbed in his study and thought rather than his colors. Also, Gyeom-san looked around himself through the Chinese poetry about his dissatisfaction and divorce from the world. Though he didn’t write many poems which were praising the nature, he liked plum blossom very much. Thus, his poems on plum blossom didn’t enjoy plum blossom itself simply but embodied the profound truth of Confucianism united with himself and plum blossom.
Among the written proses of Gyeom-san, especially the letters are taken note of. We will show the features of letter writings. They follow the form of letter writings and contain true contents. They can also be found with an academic study and are naturally connected with narrative structure.
And Gyeom-san wrote two biographies and two documentations with his collected record. We can understand the purpose of Gyeom-san as a Confucian scholar. The reason why he took the object of biography and documentation is to admire crucial characters who were representing Confucian virtue. Biography and documentation are the same narrative structure that records crucial character’s achievements in his/her lifetime. However, there is a distinct difference between the two styles in the selection of main character and the method of narration. Crucial characters of biography have obvious status and face-to-face meeting, but crucial characters of documentation are the persons in second-hand tale. Within the narrative method, biographies make use of formulaic expressions, and documentations are not interrupted by the pattern.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "論語"

2 송혁기, "조선후기 한문 산문의 이론과 비평" 월인 2006

3 김영주, "조선후기 한문 비평 연구" 보고사 2006

4 진재교, "이조 후기 한시의 사회사" 소명출판 2001

5 "英祖實錄"

6 "潛齋稿"

7 박찬수, "潛齋 金益兼 漢詩의 文學性 考察" 인문과학연구소 38 (38): 33-58, 2011

8 박찬수, "潛在 金益謙의 詩文學 硏究" 어문연구학회 48 : 109-138, 2005

9 鄭玉子, "朝鮮後期知性史" 一志社 1999

10 張志淵, "朝鮮儒敎淵源, In 儒學淵源略譜" 明文堂 1983

11 "孟子"

12 "兼山集"

13 "典故大方"

14 金洙根撰, "三淵年譜 下"

15 李勝洙, "三淵金昌翕硏究" 安東金氏三淵公派宗中 1998

16 "三淵集"

17 "http://www.you1988.er.ro"

18 안대회, "18세기 한국한시사 연구" 소명출판 2002

19 한국학연구소, "18세기 조선지식인의 문화의식" 한양대학교 출판부 2002