Looking for the Evidence of “Self-Evident Truth” = “자명한 진리”에 대한 증거 찾기 : 므두셀라 프로젝트를 통해 보는 창조과학자의 연구활동과 정체성

국문 초록 (Abstract)

창조과학에 대한 주된 비판 중 하나는 창조과학이 하나의 지식 생산 체계가 아니라 성경에 근간을 두고 있는 수사와 담론의 집합에 불과하다는 주장이다. 즉 창조과학자는 새로운 증거나 데이터를 생산하지 않고 다만 다른 과학자들의 증거와 데이터를 성경에 끼워 맞춰서 재해석하고 있을 뿐이라는 것이다. 하지만 스스로를 ‘창조과학자’라고 인식하는 이들 중 일부는 정통 과학이 요구하는 방법론을 통해서 학위를 받았으며 자신이 소속되어 있는 대학, 정부기관 등 세속적인 집단에서 연구활동을 하고 있다. 창조과학자들은 개인의 신앙과 연구활동이 분리되어야 한다는 통념을 거부한다. 이들을 어떻게 이해해야 하는가? 이러한 문제의식 하에 본 연구에서는 고려대학교 이은일 교수의 주도 하에 2000년대 초반부터 10여 년간 진행되었던 ‘므두셀라 프로젝트’를 분석했다. 성경 기술이 타협할 수 없는 과학적 · 역사적 사실이라는 연구팀의 믿음과는 별개로 ‘므두셀라 프로젝트’의 검증 대상이었던 ‘물층 이론’은 성경으로부터 도출되는 하나의 가설이었기 때문에 절대불변하는 진리인 성경 기술과 가변적인 과학지식 사이에서 중재적인 역할을 수행할 수 있었다. 창조과학자의 연구 활동을 이런 관점에서 봄으로써 창조과학자가 어떻게 ‘결론이 정해져 있는’ 연구 활동을 할 수 있는지에 대한 설명이 가능해진다. 또한 창조과학자들이 개인의 신앙과 과학자로서의 정체성 사이의 갈등을 어떻게 해소하는지 볼 수 있다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

One of the major criticisms of creation science is the assertion that creation science is not a knowledge production system but rather a collection of rhetoric and discourses based on the Bible. This means that creation scientists are not producing new evidence or data but are only reinterpreting the evidence and data produced by other scientists to make them fit in with the Bible. However, some creation scientists have received academic degrees through methodologies required by traditional science and are conducting research in secular organizations, including universities and government institutions. Creation scientists reject the common notion that personal faith and research need to be separated. How should we understand these creation scientists? In this context, this study analyzes the decadelong Methuselah Project, led by Professor Lee Eun-il (Yi Ŭnil) of Korea University in the early 2000s. Regardless of the research team‘s belief that the Bible is an uncompromisable record of scientific and historical fact, the water canopy theory, one of the theories that the Methuselah Project aimed to verify through research, was a hypothesis derived from the Bible. Therefore it was able to play a mediating role between the immutable truth of the Bible and dynamic science. By examining the research activities of creation scientists from this perspective, it is possible to explain how creation scientists can conduct research for an already fixed conclusion. Moreover, this study shows us how creation scientists resolve the conflict between their personal faith and their identity as scientists.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• A State-Subsidized Creation Science Project
• Research Background
• The Methodology of Creation Science: Verification and Dialectics
• A Case Study of Creation Science Research: The “Methuselah Project”
• Successes and Failures of Creation Science Projects
• References
• Abstract
• 국문초록

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Lee, Byung-soo, "Yŏssae Tongan-e: 6-il Ch’angjo-ŭi Chŭnggŏdŭl (In six days: evidences of six days of creations)" Sech‘ang midiŏ 2011

2 Lee, Eun-il, "Yujŏnch‘e, Tanbaekjilch‘e Kisul Mit Noch‘ul P‘yŏngga, DNA Sonsang P‘yŏngga Tŭngŭl Iyonghak Toksŏng Pyŏngga Kisul Kaebal Ch‘oejongbogosŏ (Development of toxico-logical assay on genomics, proteomics, exposure assessment and DNA damage)" Korea University 2002

3 Lee, Eun-il, "Yujŏch‘e Mit Tanbaekch‘e Hwan‘gyŏngdoksŏng Ŭig-wahaksentŏ, Koryŏ taehakkyo MRC (Environmental Toxico-Genomic and Proteomic Research Center, Korea University MRC)" 16 (16): 30-35, 2004

4 Jo, Jeong-il, "Wuri-nŭn Wae Ch‘angjogwahak-ŭl Chijihanŭŭn‘ga? – Kwahak, Sŏnggyŏng, Kŭrigo Yulli-wa Kwallyŏnhayŏ (Why do we support creation science? On science, the Bible and morals)" 150 : 29-39, 2007

5 Blancke, Stefaan, "Why Do Irrational Beliefs Mimic Science? The Cultural Evolution of Pseudoscience" 83 (83): 78-97, 2017

6 Boudry, Maarten, "What Makes Weird Beliefs Thrive? The Epidemiology of Pseudoscience" 28 (28): 1177-1198, 2014

7 Larson, Edward J., "Trial and Error: The American Controversy over Creation and Evolution" Oxford Uni-versity Press 2003

8 Locke, Simon, "The Use of Scientific Discourse by Creation Scien-tists: Some Preliminary Findings" 3 (3): 403-424, 1994

9 Shapin, Steven, "The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Mod-ern Vocation" University of Chicago Press 2008

10 Gordin, Michael D., "The Pseudoscience Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe" The University of Chicago Press 2012

11 Dawkins, Richard, "The God Delusion" Bantam Books 2006

12 Donggeun Sul, "The Expression of DNA Polymerase-β and DNA Damage in Jurkat Cells Exposed to Hydrogen Peroxide under Hyperbaric Pressure" 대한독성 유전단백체 학회 4 (4): 66-71, 2008

13 Numbers, Ronald L., "The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design" Harvard University Press 2006

14 Park, Hee-Joo, "The Creation-Evolution Debate: Carving Creation-ism in the Public Mind" 10 (10): 173-186, 2001

15 Larson, Edward J., "Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America's Continuing Debate over Science and Religion" Basic Books 2008

16 Park, Hyung Wook, "Science, State, and Spiritu-ality: Stories of Four Creationists in South Korea" 56 (56): 35-71, 2018

17 Oh, Sangnam, "Sansodoksŏng Mit Sep‘onohwa-rŭl Ch‘oraehanŭn Mulch‘ŭng Iron-e Ipgakhan 2-kiap Amnyŏk (The water canopy theory-based two-atmosphere pressure that causes oxidative toxicity and cell aging)" Han‘guk Ch‘angjo Kwahakhoe (Korean Association for Creation Research) 97-98, 2007

18 Oh, Sangnam, "Role of Elevated Pressure in Trail-Induced Apoptosis in Human Lung Carcinoma Cells" 15 (15): 1517-1528, 2010

19 Gould, Stephen Jay, "Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life" Ballantine Pub 1999

20 Trollinger, Susan L., "Righting Ameri-ca at the Creation Museum" Johns Hopkins University Press 2016

21 Lee, Eun-il, "P‘erŭm-sŏkt‘an‘gi 35% Sansonongdo-e Taehan Mulch‘ŭng Iron-e Ipgakhan Haesŏk (The water canopy theo-ry-based interpretation of 35 percent oxygen concentration in the Permo-carboniferous)" Han‘guk Ch‘angjo Kwahakhoe (Ko-rean Association for Creation Research) 135-141, 2011

22 Setälä, Vienna, "Public Perception of Evolu-tion and the Rise of Evolutionary Psychology in Finland" 20 (20): 558-573, 2011

23 Gusterson, Hugh, "Nuclear Rites: A Weapons Laboratory at the End of the Cold War" University of California Press 1996

24 Lee, Jae-man, "Noah Hongsu Konsŏt’ŭ (Noah‘s flood concert)" Turannosŏwŏn 2009

25 Allgaier, Joachim, "Networking Expertise: Discursive Coalitions and Collaborative Networks of Experts in a Public Creationism Contro-versy in the UK" 21 (21): 299-313, 2012

26 Lee, Jae-man, "Mushinnon Kija, Kŭrisŭch‘ŏn Kwahakja-ege Ttajida, Woo Jong-hak, 2014 Pip‘an” (Criticism of “An atheist reporter ques-tions a Christian scientist,” Woo Jong-hak, 2014)"

27 Lee, Eun-il, "Mulch‘ŭng Iron-e Ipgakhan 2-kiap Amnyŏk-ŭi Saengmulhakjŏk Yŏnghyang (Biological Impact of the Water Canopy Theory-based Two-atmosphere Pressure Envi-ronment)" Han‘guk Ch‘angjo Kwahakhoe (Korean Associa-tion for Creation Research) 313-316, 2013

28 Golinski, Jan, "Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science" Cambridge University Press 1998

29 Lim, In-bae, "Kich‘o Ŭig-wahak Yŏn‘gu Sentŏ (MRC) Chŏngch‘aek T‘oronhoe Charyojip (Collection of materials for a policy discussion on medical research centers) (November 17, 2006)"

30 Stanley, Matthew, "Huxley's Church and Maxwell's Demon: From Theistic Science to Naturalistic Science" University of Chi-cago Press 2014

31 Lee, Eun-il, "Han Son-e Chaphinŭn Ch’angjogwahak (Creation sci-ence at a glance)" Turanno 2008

32 Oh, Eun-Ha, "Effects of Hyperbar-ic Pressure on Cellular Morphology, Proliferation and Protein Ex-pression of Jurkat Cell" 1 (1): 116-123, 2005

33 Ruse, Michael, "Creation Science Is Not Science" 7 (7): 72-78, 1982

34 Edmond, Gary, "Creating (Public) Science in the Noah's Ark Case" 8 (8): 317-343, 2016

35 Lee, Jae-man, "Ch’angjogwahak Konsŏtŭ (Creation Science Concert)" Turanno 2006

36 Lee, Eun-il, "Ch‘angjoron Kyoyuk Idaero Choŭn‘ga (Creation sci-ence education, is it okay to maintain a status quo?)" 185 : 2016

37 Park, Chang-sung, "Ch‘angjogwahakjadŭrŭn Ŏtŏke Ch‘angjo-rŭl Chŭngmyŏngharyŏgo Hamnika? Ch‘angjogwahakjadŭre Taehan Shimgakhan Ohae (How are creation scientists trying to prove crea-tion?: serious misconceptions of creation scientists)" 179 : 29-31, 2014

38 Kim, Byung Hoon, "Ch‘angjogwahak-ŭi Ŭiŭi-wa Kidae: Shinhakja-ŭi Kwanjŏm-esŏ (The significance and expectations of creation sci-ence: from the perspective of a theologian)" 10-17,

39 Lee, Eun-il, "Ch‘angjogwahak-e Taehan Sogae 2 (An introduction on creation science 2)" 125·126 : 36-42, 2001

40 Lee, Eun-il, "Ch‘angjogwahak, Ijŏngp‘yo-ŭi Yŏkhal-ŭl Punmyŏnghi Haja (Creation science must play a clear role of a signpost)" 150 : 19-25, 2007

41 Hong Ki-beom, "Ch‘angjo-chinhwa Nonjaeng-ŭn Kwahak Non-jaeng-i Anin, Yŏksa Nonjaengida (The creation-evolution controver-sy is not about science but about history)" 166 : 118-122, 2011

42 Han, Yun-bong, "Ch‘angjo Shinang-gwa Kwahak, Kŭrigo Pogŭm (Creation faith, science, and the Gospel)" 6-63, 2017

43 Lim, Bun-sam, "Chonggyo-wa Kwahak-ŭn Ŏttŏn Kwangyin‘ga? (What is the relationship between religion and science?)" 160 : 13-22, 2010

44 Kim, Jinsoo, "Chinhwaron-ch‘angjoron Nonjaeng-e Taehan Haengwija-yŏn‘gyŏrmang Punsŏk: Kwahakgyogwasŏ-rŭl Chung-shimŭro (An actor-network analysis of the evolution-creationism controversy: focusing on Korean science textbooks)" Kookmin University 2016

45 Lee, Eun-il, "Amnyŏk Chojŏl Paeyang Changch‘i T‘ŭkhŏ Gonggo (Patent announcement of a pressure-controlled in-cubator)"

46 Sul, Dong-geun, "2-kiap Amnyŏk Yŏn‘gu-rŭl Wihan Amnyŏk Sep‘o Paeyanggi Chejak Mit 2-kiap Amnyŏg-i Sep‘o Sŏngjang Mit Sep‘o Hwalsŏng-e Mich‘inŭn Yŏnghyang (Manufacturing of a pressure cell incubator for a two-atmosphere pressure study and the impact of a two-atmosphere pressure has on cell growth and vitality)" Taehan Yebang Ŭihakhoe (Korean Society for Preventive Medicine) 343-344, 2001

47 Lee, Eun-il, "2-kiap Amnyŏgi Sep‘o Sŏngjang-gwa DNA Pokgu-e Mich‘inŭn Yŏnghyang (The effect of a two-atmosphere pressure on cell growth and DNA recovery)" 1 (1): 3-12, 2003