RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      사법분야 투고논문 : 판례상 취득시효완성 후 등기 전의 법률관계 = The acquisitive prescription completed yet unregistered legal relations in judicial precedents

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Acquisitive prescription is a method of acquiring property or right by meeting statutory requirements of continuous possession In civil law, there are prescriptive system of occupancy acquisition(civil law §245①) and prescriptive system of resister acquisition(civil law §245②). Prescriptive system of occupancy acquisition is a method of acquiring ownership by holding possessions in the role of an owner, public and peaceful for twenty years. Prescriptive system of resister acquisition is a method of acquiring ownership by holding possessions in the role of an owner, peaceful and public for ten years. A wide range of precedents on prescriptive system of occupancy acquisition not only provide an analysis on the prescriptive system of acquisition, but also make a conclusion that goes against a principle of civil law, drawing criticisms. Supreme Court has so far offered a tremendous array of analysis and standard for the solution to acquisitive prescription problems through the five principles of acquisitive prescription. Such an analysis has a great amount of impact on civil law and plays a significant role in resolving many different conflicts in field. However, contents not related to legal matters such as political reason influence the interpretation of the analysis to the point where many problems and contradiction occur. Prescriptive system of acquisition in civil law needs to be modified to a great extent. Especially regarding to approving range of acquisitive prescription, approving acquisitive prescription limitedly is considered to be advisable. Such a phenomenon seems to be persuasive even if compared with the recent precedents of the Supreme Court that, unlike in the past, do not approve acquisitive prescription easily. The Supreme Court`s analysis regarding prescriptive system of occupancy acquisition needs to be continuously researched as it has potential to impact on the revision of civil law.
      번역하기

      Acquisitive prescription is a method of acquiring property or right by meeting statutory requirements of continuous possession In civil law, there are prescriptive system of occupancy acquisition(civil law §245①) and prescriptive system of resister...

      Acquisitive prescription is a method of acquiring property or right by meeting statutory requirements of continuous possession In civil law, there are prescriptive system of occupancy acquisition(civil law §245①) and prescriptive system of resister acquisition(civil law §245②). Prescriptive system of occupancy acquisition is a method of acquiring ownership by holding possessions in the role of an owner, public and peaceful for twenty years. Prescriptive system of resister acquisition is a method of acquiring ownership by holding possessions in the role of an owner, peaceful and public for ten years. A wide range of precedents on prescriptive system of occupancy acquisition not only provide an analysis on the prescriptive system of acquisition, but also make a conclusion that goes against a principle of civil law, drawing criticisms. Supreme Court has so far offered a tremendous array of analysis and standard for the solution to acquisitive prescription problems through the five principles of acquisitive prescription. Such an analysis has a great amount of impact on civil law and plays a significant role in resolving many different conflicts in field. However, contents not related to legal matters such as political reason influence the interpretation of the analysis to the point where many problems and contradiction occur. Prescriptive system of acquisition in civil law needs to be modified to a great extent. Especially regarding to approving range of acquisitive prescription, approving acquisitive prescription limitedly is considered to be advisable. Such a phenomenon seems to be persuasive even if compared with the recent precedents of the Supreme Court that, unlike in the past, do not approve acquisitive prescription easily. The Supreme Court`s analysis regarding prescriptive system of occupancy acquisition needs to be continuously researched as it has potential to impact on the revision of civil law.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼