RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      “상시적 망각”과 “적극적 기억”의 국제정치학 = “Casual Forgetting” in and “Active Remembering” for IR

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Drawing on the insights from discourse advanced in Foucault’s 1969 work, Archaeology of Knowledge, this paper first problematizes the current state of International Relations (IR) theory in which a few theoretical perspectives dominate the epistemic terrain of the field, by serving as a ‘political’ yardstick of judging what counts as ‘scientific’ knowledge and ‘good’ research. Then this paper undertakes an “active remembering” of a theoretical perspective that is casually forgotten in the theoretical discussion about international politics, namely postcolonialism. The aim of “active remembering” is to illustrate epistemic and pratical benefits that postcolonialism can bring to us and to broaden the parochial status of IR scholarship. Furthermore, this paper puts on a postcolonialist lens to look at Korea’s international political issues in different ways to generate alternative approaches. In conclusion, this paper shows that although postcolonialism remains at the margins of contemporary IR scholarship, it can still make significant epistemic contributions to the study of IR and practical contributions to addressing the challenges that South Korea and East Asia face.
      번역하기

      Drawing on the insights from discourse advanced in Foucault’s 1969 work, Archaeology of Knowledge, this paper first problematizes the current state of International Relations (IR) theory in which a few theoretical perspectives dominate the epistemic...

      Drawing on the insights from discourse advanced in Foucault’s 1969 work, Archaeology of Knowledge, this paper first problematizes the current state of International Relations (IR) theory in which a few theoretical perspectives dominate the epistemic terrain of the field, by serving as a ‘political’ yardstick of judging what counts as ‘scientific’ knowledge and ‘good’ research. Then this paper undertakes an “active remembering” of a theoretical perspective that is casually forgotten in the theoretical discussion about international politics, namely postcolonialism. The aim of “active remembering” is to illustrate epistemic and pratical benefits that postcolonialism can bring to us and to broaden the parochial status of IR scholarship. Furthermore, this paper puts on a postcolonialist lens to look at Korea’s international political issues in different ways to generate alternative approaches. In conclusion, this paper shows that although postcolonialism remains at the margins of contemporary IR scholarship, it can still make significant epistemic contributions to the study of IR and practical contributions to addressing the challenges that South Korea and East Asia face.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼