RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      서비스본질 기반의 서비스산업 정책방안 = A Study on Service Industry Development Policy by Service Nature

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103122043

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The current research investigates the strategies for fostering service industries from the service's nature perspectives. Because the service industry is broad and heterogeneous in nature, if service's nature is not considered in building strategies for developing service industries, it would have a limited perspective, and thus, it would be difficult to foster large growth in service industries. In addition, not considering service's nature would not encourage synergy among service sectors nor encourage innovative development among individual sectors. Therefore, we need to understand that different service sectors are all under the umbrella for service industries, and consider the service's nature. The current research considers the service's relational, bidirectional, horizontality, and harmonization nature of services, and also, intangibility, inseparability, heterogeneity, perishability were considered in suggesting strategies for fostering service industries. These results can be used to developing governmental policies for developing service industries.
      번역하기

      The current research investigates the strategies for fostering service industries from the service's nature perspectives. Because the service industry is broad and heterogeneous in nature, if service's nature is not considered in building strategies f...

      The current research investigates the strategies for fostering service industries from the service's nature perspectives. Because the service industry is broad and heterogeneous in nature, if service's nature is not considered in building strategies for developing service industries, it would have a limited perspective, and thus, it would be difficult to foster large growth in service industries. In addition, not considering service's nature would not encourage synergy among service sectors nor encourage innovative development among individual sectors. Therefore, we need to understand that different service sectors are all under the umbrella for service industries, and consider the service's nature. The current research considers the service's relational, bidirectional, horizontality, and harmonization nature of services, and also, intangibility, inseparability, heterogeneity, perishability were considered in suggesting strategies for fostering service industries. These results can be used to developing governmental policies for developing service industries.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김현수, "서비스연구의 프레임워크 제안" 서비스사이언스학회 5 (5): 199-216, 2015

      2 Lusch, R. F., "Toward a conceptual foundation for service science:Contribution from service-dominant logic" 47 (47): 5-14, 2008

      3 Autor, D.H., "The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market" 103 (103): 1553-1597, 2013

      4 Kim, Hyunsoo, "Strategies for Global Competitiveness of Service Industries in Korea" 85-95, 2016

      5 Kim, Hyunsoo, "Introduction of the 'Service Industry Development Index': Initial Toughts on the New Paradigm Shift" 8 (8): 85-94, 2016

      6 World Economic Forum, "Future of Jobs:Emloyment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution" 2016

      7 Kim, Hyunsoo, "Audit Paradigm Shift by Economy and Business Change" 25 : 5-26, 2015

      8 Kim, Jong Yeoul, "An Analysis of Manufacturing - Service Industry Co-evolution: A Spiral Growth Model" 8 (8): 57-72, 2016

      9 The Society of Service Science, "A Vision Statement for Service Korea Initiative" 42-47, 2015

      10 The Service Korea Initiative, "A Vision Statement for Global Service Korea Initiative" 18-23, 2016

      1 김현수, "서비스연구의 프레임워크 제안" 서비스사이언스학회 5 (5): 199-216, 2015

      2 Lusch, R. F., "Toward a conceptual foundation for service science:Contribution from service-dominant logic" 47 (47): 5-14, 2008

      3 Autor, D.H., "The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market" 103 (103): 1553-1597, 2013

      4 Kim, Hyunsoo, "Strategies for Global Competitiveness of Service Industries in Korea" 85-95, 2016

      5 Kim, Hyunsoo, "Introduction of the 'Service Industry Development Index': Initial Toughts on the New Paradigm Shift" 8 (8): 85-94, 2016

      6 World Economic Forum, "Future of Jobs:Emloyment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution" 2016

      7 Kim, Hyunsoo, "Audit Paradigm Shift by Economy and Business Change" 25 : 5-26, 2015

      8 Kim, Jong Yeoul, "An Analysis of Manufacturing - Service Industry Co-evolution: A Spiral Growth Model" 8 (8): 57-72, 2016

      9 The Society of Service Science, "A Vision Statement for Service Korea Initiative" 42-47, 2015

      10 The Service Korea Initiative, "A Vision Statement for Global Service Korea Initiative" 18-23, 2016

      11 Kim, Hyunsoo, "A Transition Strategy from Traditional Economy to New Economy" 175-185, 2015

      12 Kim, Hyunsoo, "A Structural Change to Service-Centered Economy by the 4th Industrial Revolution: U-Model Industry and Employment Structure" The Society of Service Science 43-54, 2016

      13 The Korean Government, "A Strategy for Korean Service Economy" 2016

      14 Park, Giim, "A Growth Strategy for Korean Tourism Industry by Comparison with Japan" 189-197, 2016

      15 김현수, "4차 산업혁명의 서비스경제화 촉진 연구" 서비스사이언스학회 6 (6): 15-27, 2016

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0 0 0
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼