RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      국ㆍ공립대학의 교수임용과 보직에 대한 성적(性的) 균형발전 방안

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76189146

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Woman uniprofessor ratio is rising in recent 3 years(16.6% in 2002, 19.4% in 2003, 22.6% in 2004). But, if part-time lecturer ratio(according to standard April, 2003, 40.6%) and woman doctor's ratio(according to standard April, 2003, 14.8%) are taken into consideration, woman-professor`ratio is relatively low. Perhaps, it may be caused by the discriminative treatment of woman candidate in professor appointment processing.
      Constitutional Law Art. 11 (1) is prescribing All citizens shall be egual before the law, and there shall be no discrimination in political, economic, social or cultural life on account of sex, religion or social status. According to this sex, religion or social status put restriction on the legislative discretion. Sex, religion or social status are not essential constituent to justify discrimination. Therefore, sex must not be factor to discriminate woman candidate. And specially in such a case Strict Scrutiny should be applied.
      In order to accomplish equality of the sexes in uniprofessor appointment processing, Public Educational Officials Act was recently revised(July, 2003). In it affirmative action for woman is scheduled. Of course, reverse discrimination could be caused by this action. But it is not suspect classification. If we consider public official social quantitative and qualitative aspect, it is the compensation for past discrimination of woman and improve present imbalance.
      Therefore, we must try to dissolve the problem, that is the lack of woman-professor in University. Even research achievement and educational ability are imfortant factors in practicing of professor role. If these are equal, we must give priority to the woman. University must establish sex equality committee. And a woman committee member must participate in professor employment judging.
      번역하기

      Woman uniprofessor ratio is rising in recent 3 years(16.6% in 2002, 19.4% in 2003, 22.6% in 2004). But, if part-time lecturer ratio(according to standard April, 2003, 40.6%) and woman doctor's ratio(according to standard April, 2003, 14.8%) are taken ...

      Woman uniprofessor ratio is rising in recent 3 years(16.6% in 2002, 19.4% in 2003, 22.6% in 2004). But, if part-time lecturer ratio(according to standard April, 2003, 40.6%) and woman doctor's ratio(according to standard April, 2003, 14.8%) are taken into consideration, woman-professor`ratio is relatively low. Perhaps, it may be caused by the discriminative treatment of woman candidate in professor appointment processing.
      Constitutional Law Art. 11 (1) is prescribing All citizens shall be egual before the law, and there shall be no discrimination in political, economic, social or cultural life on account of sex, religion or social status. According to this sex, religion or social status put restriction on the legislative discretion. Sex, religion or social status are not essential constituent to justify discrimination. Therefore, sex must not be factor to discriminate woman candidate. And specially in such a case Strict Scrutiny should be applied.
      In order to accomplish equality of the sexes in uniprofessor appointment processing, Public Educational Officials Act was recently revised(July, 2003). In it affirmative action for woman is scheduled. Of course, reverse discrimination could be caused by this action. But it is not suspect classification. If we consider public official social quantitative and qualitative aspect, it is the compensation for past discrimination of woman and improve present imbalance.
      Therefore, we must try to dissolve the problem, that is the lack of woman-professor in University. Even research achievement and educational ability are imfortant factors in practicing of professor role. If these are equal, we must give priority to the woman. University must establish sex equality committee. And a woman committee member must participate in professor employment judging.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 국ㆍ공립대학 교수 현황과 문제점
      • Ⅲ. 국ㆍ공립대학 교수 성비불균형의 원인
      • Ⅳ. 국ㆍ공립대 교수 성비 불균형 해소방안
      • Ⅴ. 마치는 글
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 국ㆍ공립대학 교수 현황과 문제점
      • Ⅲ. 국ㆍ공립대학 교수 성비불균형의 원인
      • Ⅳ. 국ㆍ공립대 교수 성비 불균형 해소방안
      • Ⅴ. 마치는 글
      • 〈Abstract〉
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.07 1.07 1.02
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.08 1.07 1.097 0.48
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼