RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    웹 정보검색 학습활동이 전문가 교사와 예비 교사의문제표상력에 미치는 영향 = The Effects of Information-Seeking Strategy on Expert and Pre-Service Teachers` Problem Representation Performance on the Web

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959673

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of information-seeking strategy on experts and novices teachers` problem solving performance on the web. The DEEP analytic method was implemented to identy each group of teachers` problem representation performance in terms of: 1) surface level- problem representation of externally identified information in problems; 2) structural level- problem representation of information structuredness that were retrieved from surface level problem understanding; and 3) deep level- the quality of problem representation process and consequences. In the result, the web searching strategy has not been highly effective on deep level problem representation performance of novice teachers even though it had affected surface and structural level problem presentation performance of them.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of information-seeking strategy on experts and novices teachers` problem solving performance on the web. The DEEP analytic method was implemented to identy each group of teachers` problem representa...

    The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of information-seeking strategy on experts and novices teachers` problem solving performance on the web. The DEEP analytic method was implemented to identy each group of teachers` problem representation performance in terms of: 1) surface level- problem representation of externally identified information in problems; 2) structural level- problem representation of information structuredness that were retrieved from surface level problem understanding; and 3) deep level- the quality of problem representation process and consequences. In the result, the web searching strategy has not been highly effective on deep level problem representation performance of novice teachers even though it had affected surface and structural level problem presentation performance of them.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "What does it mean when experts disagree?" Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum 229-244, 2001

    2 "Well- and ill-defined measures of everyday cognition: Relationship to older adults' intellectual ability and functional status" 17 (17): 101-115, 2002

    3 "Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies" Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co 337-346, 2000

    4 "Two approaches to the study of experts' characteristics" NY: Cambridge university press 21-30, 2006a

    5 "Toward a meta-theory of problem solving" 48 (48): 63-85, 2000

    6 "Thinking and problem solving (2nd Ed.)" San Diego, CA: Academic press 2006

    7 "The Web as an Information Resource in K-12 Education: Strategies for Supporting Students in Searching and Processing Information" 75 (75): 285-329, 2005

    8 "The Psychology of Abilities, Competencies, and Expertise" Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 2003

    9 "The Promise of Educational Psychology, Volume 2: Teaching for Meaningful Learning" Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall 2002

    10 "The DEEP methodology for assessing learning in complex domains (Final report the National Science Foundation Evaluative Research and Evaluation Capacity Building" Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University 2004

    1 "What does it mean when experts disagree?" Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum 229-244, 2001

    2 "Well- and ill-defined measures of everyday cognition: Relationship to older adults' intellectual ability and functional status" 17 (17): 101-115, 2002

    3 "Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies" Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co 337-346, 2000

    4 "Two approaches to the study of experts' characteristics" NY: Cambridge university press 21-30, 2006a

    5 "Toward a meta-theory of problem solving" 48 (48): 63-85, 2000

    6 "Thinking and problem solving (2nd Ed.)" San Diego, CA: Academic press 2006

    7 "The Web as an Information Resource in K-12 Education: Strategies for Supporting Students in Searching and Processing Information" 75 (75): 285-329, 2005

    8 "The Psychology of Abilities, Competencies, and Expertise" Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 2003

    9 "The Promise of Educational Psychology, Volume 2: Teaching for Meaningful Learning" Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall 2002

    10 "The DEEP methodology for assessing learning in complex domains (Final report the National Science Foundation Evaluative Research and Evaluation Capacity Building" Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University 2004

    11 "Studies of expertise from psychological perspectives" NY: Cambridge university press 41-67, 2006

    12 "Student management of Web-based hypermedia resources during open-ended problem solving" 94 (94): 75-93, 2000

    13 "Smart machines in education" Meno Park, CA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press 2001

    14 "Representation and analogical problem solving of expert and novice teachers" 2004

    15 "Procedural and conceptual knowledge of expert and novice students for the solving of a basic problem in chemistry" 21 (21): 195-211, 1999

    16 "Novice and Expert Teachers' Conceptions of Learners’ Prior Knowledge" 88 (88): 970-983, 2004

    17 "Methods for studying the structure of expertise: Psychometric approaches" NY: Cambridge 147-166, 2006

    18 "Learning to solve problem: An instructional design guide" San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer 2004

    19 "Laboratory methods for assessing experts' and novices' knowldge" NY: Cambridge university press 167-184, 2006b

    20 "Information seeking as problem-solving using a qualitative approach to uncover the novice learners' information-seeking processes in a Perseus hypertext system" 19 (19): 71-92, 1997

    21 "Individual and collaborative construction of causal concept maps: An online technique for learning and assessment" Palermo: Institute for Educational Technology, Italian Research 2005

    22 "Impacts of an Online-Supported, Resource- Based Learning Environment: Does One Size Fit All?" 24 (24): 141-159, 2003

    23 "How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school" Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press 2000

    24 "How can expertise be defined? Implications of research from cognitive psychology" New York: Macmillan 81-100, 1998

    25 "Expertise in ill-defined problem-solving domains as effective strategy use" 33 (33): 1377-1387, 2005

    26 "Expertise and estimating what other people know: the influence of professional experience and type of knowledge" 7 (7): 317-330, 2001

    27 "Expert-novice distinctions among educational evaluators: Dynamic conceptions of knowledge organization and problem representation" 2001

    28 "Complex problem solving: The European perspective" Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence erlbaum associates 1995

    29 "Cognitive processes in well-defined and ill-defined problem solving" San Francisco, CA. 1995.4

    30 "Children's Internet searching on complex problems: performance and process analyses" 49 (49): 840-849, 1998

    31 "Age, Ability, and the Role of Prior Knowledge on the Acquisition of New Domain Knowledge: Promising Results in a Real-World Learning Environment" 20 (20): 341-355, 2005

    32 "Accessing problem solving strategy knowledge:The complementary use of concurrent. verbal protocols and retrospective debriefing" 92 : 413-425, 2000

    33 "A view from biology Toward a unified theory of problem solving" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1-20, 1991

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼