RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      균역법 시행 전후 훈련도감(訓鍊都監)의 재원확보 양상 = How the Hullyeon Dogam(訓鍊都監) office secured budgets, around the time of the “Gyun’yeok” institution’s implementation

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      With the implementation of the Gyun’yeok institution, the amount of textile materials(“Gapo”) collected from households by the military offices(“Gunmun”) was reduced from 2 ‘pil’ units to 1, but the Hullyeon Dogam office, compared to other offices such as Geum’wi-yeong and Eo’yeong-cheong, was rather well compensated(“Geubdae”) for its losses. At the time, Hullyeon Dogam was having trouble securing grains that would be distributed to the soldiers as salary(“Ryomi, 料米”) and military demands[軍需], but was provided with ‘Geubdae’ by the Gyun’yeok-cheong office, in the form of Daedong rice(“Daedong-mi”). Also, it was provided with interest which was generated by the Sangjin-gok(常賑穀) reserve, operated by the Gyun’yeok-cheong office as part of the Hwan’gok(還穀) practice. Other than this, Hullyeon Dogam was offered the right to collect taxes from Gungbang(宮房) bodies’ lands, which had actually been exempted from taxation(“Myeonse-gyeol”). And when the Hullyeon Dogam soldiers had to step in as Geum’wi-yeong and Eo’yeong-cheong soldiers were unable to post their shifts in the capital area, those two offices were obliged to provide the Hullyeon Dogam soldiers with compensation, in the form of Yeosu-jeon(旅需錢). Finally, since 1758, the 34th year of king Yeongjo’s reign, Hullyeon Dogam was authorized to annually take advantage of the grain under the jurisdiction of the Finance “Hojo” Ministry, in case it needed additional resources to pay their Bokma-gun soldiers with Ryomi salary.
      It should also be noted that during the time the Gyun’yeok institution was in operation, Hullyeon Dogam continued to create over 100,000 ‘nyang’ units of coins, and earned more than 60,000 nyang units from that venture. With such newly garnered profits, Hullyeon Dogam purchased silver, loaned it to soldiers and brought in additional income. And in the meantime, monitoring the Yang’hyang-cheong office’s failure to collect adequate amount of taxes from the garrison farms(“Dunjeon”), Hullyeon Dogam also newly rented, purchased, or even initiated reclamation efforts of those farms, to use it as another source of income that could be diverted to resources which would facilitate the Hullyeon Dogam’s sub-offices.
      In short, Hullyeon Dogam was continuously aided and supported by central financial offices even when other central military offices were suffering from the government’s overall [financial] retrenchment policy. As a result, Hullyeon Dogam, which was operated by rotated servicemen(“Jangbeon-gun”), became a liability to the Joseon government’s financial management. Yet, in order to protect the king and the population from foreign threats, and foster political stability by managing internal social strifes, maintaining Hullyeon Dogam as it is was more than an imperative task for the government. The way the Hullyeon Dogam office secured necessary budgets for itself was a little complicated, but it was also a policy-based effort intended to minimize financial pressure upon the government, sanctioned by the government itself which had to operate a military full time.
      번역하기

      With the implementation of the Gyun’yeok institution, the amount of textile materials(“Gapo”) collected from households by the military offices(“Gunmun”) was reduced from 2 ‘pil’ units to 1, but the Hullyeon Dogam office, compared to oth...

      With the implementation of the Gyun’yeok institution, the amount of textile materials(“Gapo”) collected from households by the military offices(“Gunmun”) was reduced from 2 ‘pil’ units to 1, but the Hullyeon Dogam office, compared to other offices such as Geum’wi-yeong and Eo’yeong-cheong, was rather well compensated(“Geubdae”) for its losses. At the time, Hullyeon Dogam was having trouble securing grains that would be distributed to the soldiers as salary(“Ryomi, 料米”) and military demands[軍需], but was provided with ‘Geubdae’ by the Gyun’yeok-cheong office, in the form of Daedong rice(“Daedong-mi”). Also, it was provided with interest which was generated by the Sangjin-gok(常賑穀) reserve, operated by the Gyun’yeok-cheong office as part of the Hwan’gok(還穀) practice. Other than this, Hullyeon Dogam was offered the right to collect taxes from Gungbang(宮房) bodies’ lands, which had actually been exempted from taxation(“Myeonse-gyeol”). And when the Hullyeon Dogam soldiers had to step in as Geum’wi-yeong and Eo’yeong-cheong soldiers were unable to post their shifts in the capital area, those two offices were obliged to provide the Hullyeon Dogam soldiers with compensation, in the form of Yeosu-jeon(旅需錢). Finally, since 1758, the 34th year of king Yeongjo’s reign, Hullyeon Dogam was authorized to annually take advantage of the grain under the jurisdiction of the Finance “Hojo” Ministry, in case it needed additional resources to pay their Bokma-gun soldiers with Ryomi salary.
      It should also be noted that during the time the Gyun’yeok institution was in operation, Hullyeon Dogam continued to create over 100,000 ‘nyang’ units of coins, and earned more than 60,000 nyang units from that venture. With such newly garnered profits, Hullyeon Dogam purchased silver, loaned it to soldiers and brought in additional income. And in the meantime, monitoring the Yang’hyang-cheong office’s failure to collect adequate amount of taxes from the garrison farms(“Dunjeon”), Hullyeon Dogam also newly rented, purchased, or even initiated reclamation efforts of those farms, to use it as another source of income that could be diverted to resources which would facilitate the Hullyeon Dogam’s sub-offices.
      In short, Hullyeon Dogam was continuously aided and supported by central financial offices even when other central military offices were suffering from the government’s overall [financial] retrenchment policy. As a result, Hullyeon Dogam, which was operated by rotated servicemen(“Jangbeon-gun”), became a liability to the Joseon government’s financial management. Yet, in order to protect the king and the population from foreign threats, and foster political stability by managing internal social strifes, maintaining Hullyeon Dogam as it is was more than an imperative task for the government. The way the Hullyeon Dogam office secured necessary budgets for itself was a little complicated, but it was also a policy-based effort intended to minimize financial pressure upon the government, sanctioned by the government itself which had to operate a military full time.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 머리말
      • 1. 18세기 전반 훈련도감의 수취구조
      • 2. 균역법 시행 이후 훈련도감의 재원확보 방향
      • 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • 머리말
      • 1. 18세기 전반 훈련도감의 수취구조
      • 2. 균역법 시행 이후 훈련도감의 재원확보 방향
      • 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • 〈Abstract〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "훈국총요 (藏 K2-3405, K2-3406)"

      2 "훈국사례촬요 (藏 K2-3407)"

      3 "훈국등록 (藏 K2-3398, K2-3399, K2-3400, K2-3401)"

      4 손병규, "통계로 보는 조선후기 국가경제- 18-19세기 재정자료의 기초적 분석" 성균관대학교출판부 2013

      5 박범, "조선후기 糧餉廳의 屯田 수취방식 변화와 雜費 운영" 대동문화연구원 (92) : 129-162, 2015

      6 정수환, "조선후기 화폐유통과 경제생활" 경인문화사 2013

      7 서태원, "조선후기 지방군 운용과 영장제" 6 : 2000

      8 김종수, "조선후기 중앙군제연구-훈련도감의 설립과 사회변동" 혜안 2003

      9 이근호, "조선후기 수도방위체제" 서울학연구소 1998

      10 송양섭, "조선후기 둔전연구" 경인문화사 2006

      1 "훈국총요 (藏 K2-3405, K2-3406)"

      2 "훈국사례촬요 (藏 K2-3407)"

      3 "훈국등록 (藏 K2-3398, K2-3399, K2-3400, K2-3401)"

      4 손병규, "통계로 보는 조선후기 국가경제- 18-19세기 재정자료의 기초적 분석" 성균관대학교출판부 2013

      5 박범, "조선후기 糧餉廳의 屯田 수취방식 변화와 雜費 운영" 대동문화연구원 (92) : 129-162, 2015

      6 정수환, "조선후기 화폐유통과 경제생활" 경인문화사 2013

      7 서태원, "조선후기 지방군 운용과 영장제" 6 : 2000

      8 김종수, "조선후기 중앙군제연구-훈련도감의 설립과 사회변동" 혜안 2003

      9 이근호, "조선후기 수도방위체제" 서울학연구소 1998

      10 송양섭, "조선후기 둔전연구" 경인문화사 2006

      11 김재호, "조선후기 군사재정의 수량적 기초: 규모, 구성, 원천 -『賦役實摠』의 분석을 중심으로 -" 조선시대사학회 (66) : 181-254, 2013

      12 차문섭, "조선조 후기의 영장에 대하여" 12 : 1968

      13 송양섭, "영조의 국가정책과 정치이념" 한국학중앙연구원출판부 2012

      14 최주희, "영조대 중반 균역법 시행논의와 <宣惠廳定例>의 간행" 한국사연구회 (164) : 193-236, 2014

      15 오종록, "붕당정치와 軍營" 29 : 1995

      16 "균청조획"

      17 "균역청사목 (追)(奎17253)"

      18 "균역청사목 (原)(奎1124)"

      19 송기중, "균역법 실시와 수군 급대의 운영" 역사학회 (218) : 173-208, 2013

      20 "군색기부 (奎19391)"

      21 李泰鎭, "韓國軍制史-近世朝鮮後期篇" 육군본부 1977

      22 車勇杰, "軍事制度" 국사편찬위원회 4 : 1976

      23 김종수, "訓局謄錄 1" 한국학중앙연구원출판부 2011

      24 金龍國, "肅宗朝 北漢山城考" 8 : 1960

      25 차문섭, "束伍軍硏究" 1 : 1971

      26 김옥근, "朝鮮王朝財政史硏究" 일조각 1987

      27 이태진, "朝鮮後期의 政治와 軍營制 變遷" 한국연구원 1985

      28 吳宗祿, "朝鮮後期 首都防衛體制에 대한 일고찰-5軍營의 三手兵制와 守城戰" 33 : 1988

      29 최완기, "朝鮮後期 訓練都監의 賃運活動 : 稅穀運送을 중심으로" 38 : 1984

      30 서태원, "朝鮮後期 地方軍制硏究 : 營將制를 중심으로" 혜안 1999

      31 車文燮, "朝鮮後期 中央軍制의 再編" 9 : 1981

      32 최효식, "朝鮮後期 中央軍制硏究" 신서원 1995

      33 이광우, "19세기 전반기 삼군문(三軍門)의 재정 운영 실태" 국방부군사편찬연구소 (89) : 75-113, 2013

      34 송양섭, "17세기 군영문 둔전의 확대와 경영형태의 변화" 36 : 2000

      35 김종수, "17세기 訓鍊都監 軍制와 都監軍의 활동" 2 : 1994

      36 민족문화추진회, "(국역)만기요람"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 역사와 현실 -> 역사와 현실
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> YŎKSA WA HYŎNSIL
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.91 0.91 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.92 1.68 0.36
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼