RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      비율제한 및 과제제시방법에 따른 3, 4, 5세 유아의 비상징 수 비교능력

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103043698

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate young children’s nonsymbolic magnitude comparison ability according to ratio limit and task condition.
      Methods: The participants included 40 3-year-old children, 42 4-year-old children, and 41 5-yearold children recruited from 4 childcare centers located in Seoul, Korea. All magnitude comparison tasks were composed of image material tasks and concrete material tasks. In addition, each magnitude comparison task varied with the ratio of the two quantities; 0.5 ratio, 0.67 ratio, 0.75 ratio.
      Results and Conclusion: The results revealed that 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children could perform nonsymbolic magnitude comparison tasks without learning experiences. Also, 3-, 4-, and 5-yearold children could perform concrete material tasks better than image material tasks in nonsymbolic magnitude comparison tasks. Furthermore, children’s performance on nonsymbolic magnitude comparison tasks indicated the ratio signature of the approximate number system. Children have a degree of numerical capacity prior to formal mathematics instruction. Also, children were influenced by task conditions or sense stimulus when they processed numerical information. Furthermore, the approximate number system can be used in understanding the ordinality of number.
      번역하기

      Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate young children’s nonsymbolic magnitude comparison ability according to ratio limit and task condition. Methods: The participants included 40 3-year-old children, 42 4-year-old children, and ...

      Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate young children’s nonsymbolic magnitude comparison ability according to ratio limit and task condition.
      Methods: The participants included 40 3-year-old children, 42 4-year-old children, and 41 5-yearold children recruited from 4 childcare centers located in Seoul, Korea. All magnitude comparison tasks were composed of image material tasks and concrete material tasks. In addition, each magnitude comparison task varied with the ratio of the two quantities; 0.5 ratio, 0.67 ratio, 0.75 ratio.
      Results and Conclusion: The results revealed that 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children could perform nonsymbolic magnitude comparison tasks without learning experiences. Also, 3-, 4-, and 5-yearold children could perform concrete material tasks better than image material tasks in nonsymbolic magnitude comparison tasks. Furthermore, children’s performance on nonsymbolic magnitude comparison tasks indicated the ratio signature of the approximate number system. Children have a degree of numerical capacity prior to formal mathematics instruction. Also, children were influenced by task conditions or sense stimulus when they processed numerical information. Furthermore, the approximate number system can be used in understanding the ordinality of number.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 서론
      • 연구방법
      • 연구결과
      • 논의 및 결론
      • References
      • 서론
      • 연구방법
      • 연구결과
      • 논의 및 결론
      • References
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 John H. Flavell, "Young Children's Ability to Differentiate Appearance-Reality and Level 2 Perspectives in the Tactile Modality" JSTOR 60 (60): 201-, 1989

      2 Gopnik, A., "Words, thoughts, and theories" MIT Press 1997

      3 Carey, S., "The origins of concepts" Oxford University Press 2009

      4 Cooper, R. G., "The origins of cognitive skill: The eighteenth annual Carnegie symposium on cognition" Erlbaum 157-192, 1984

      5 John H. Flavell, "The development of children's knowledge about the appearance–reality distinction." American Psychological Association (APA) 41 (41): 418-425, 1986

      6 Bruner, J., "The culture of education" Harvard University Press 1966

      7 Piaget, J., "The child’s conception of number" W. W. Norton & Company 1965

      8 Lisa Feigenson, "The Representations Underlying Infants' Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes" SAGE Publications 13 (13): 150-156, 2016

      9 Giovanni Pezzulo, "The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling" Frontiers Media SA 2 : 2011

      10 Slava Kalyuga, "The Expertise Reversal Effect" Informa UK Limited 38 (38): 23-31, 2003

      1 John H. Flavell, "Young Children's Ability to Differentiate Appearance-Reality and Level 2 Perspectives in the Tactile Modality" JSTOR 60 (60): 201-, 1989

      2 Gopnik, A., "Words, thoughts, and theories" MIT Press 1997

      3 Carey, S., "The origins of concepts" Oxford University Press 2009

      4 Cooper, R. G., "The origins of cognitive skill: The eighteenth annual Carnegie symposium on cognition" Erlbaum 157-192, 1984

      5 John H. Flavell, "The development of children's knowledge about the appearance–reality distinction." American Psychological Association (APA) 41 (41): 418-425, 1986

      6 Bruner, J., "The culture of education" Harvard University Press 1966

      7 Piaget, J., "The child’s conception of number" W. W. Norton & Company 1965

      8 Lisa Feigenson, "The Representations Underlying Infants' Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes" SAGE Publications 13 (13): 150-156, 2016

      9 Giovanni Pezzulo, "The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling" Frontiers Media SA 2 : 2011

      10 Slava Kalyuga, "The Expertise Reversal Effect" Informa UK Limited 38 (38): 23-31, 2003

      11 Analucia D. Schliemann, "The Evolution of Mathematical Reasoning: Everyday versus Idealized Understandings" Elsevier BV 22 (22): 242-266, 2002

      12 McCrink, K, "Ratio abstraction by 6-monthold infants" 18 (18): 740-745, 2007

      13 Mix, K. S., "Quantitative development in infancy and early childhood" Oxford University Press 2002

      14 Sara Cordes, "Quantitative competencies in infancy" Wiley-Blackwell 11 (11): 803-808, 2008

      15 Sue Ellen Antell, "Perception of Numerical Invariance in Neonates" JSTOR 54 (54): 695-, 1983

      16 Jennifer S. Lipton, "Origins of Number Sense" SAGE Publications 14 (14): 396-401, 2016

      17 Robbie Case, "Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span" Elsevier BV 33 (33): 386-404, 1982

      18 Prentice Starkey, "Numerical abstraction by human infants" Elsevier BV 36 (36): 97-127, 1990

      19 Elizabeth M Brannon, "Number bias for the discrimination of large visual sets in infancy" Elsevier BV 93 (93): B59-B68, 2004

      20 Hilary Barth, "Nonsymbolic, approximate arithmetic in children: Abstract addition prior to instruction." American Psychological Association (APA) 44 (44): 1466-1477, 2008

      21 Hilary Barth, "Non-symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children" Elsevier BV 98 (98): 199-222, 2006

      22 Koleen McCrink, "Moving along the number line: Operational momentum in nonsymbolic arithmetic" Springer Nature 69 (69): 1324-1333, 2007

      23 Christopher R. Rakes, "Methods of Instructional Improvement in Algebra" American Educational Research Association (AERA) 80 (80): 372-400, 2010

      24 Justin N. Wood, "Infants' enumeration of actions: numerical discrimination and its signature limits" Wiley-Blackwell 8 (8): 173-181, 2005

      25 Justin Halberda, "Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement" Springer Nature 455 (455): 665-668, 2008

      26 Mussen, P. H., "Handbook of child psychology" Wiley 1983

      27 Resnick, L. B., "From protoquantities to operators: Building mathematical competence on a foundation of everyday knowledge" 19 : 275-323, 1992

      28 Lisa Feigenson, "Core systems of number" Elsevier BV 8 (8): 307-314, 2004

      29 Siegler, R. S., "Children’s thinking" Prentice-Hall 1991

      30 Peter Bryant, "Children's Understanding of the Relation between Addition and Subtraction: Inversion, Identity, and Decomposition" Elsevier BV 74 (74): 194-212, 1999

      31 Nicole M. McNeil, "Benefits of Practicing 4 = 2 + 2: Nontraditional Problem Formats Facilitate Children’s Understanding of Mathematical Equivalence" Wiley-Blackwell 82 (82): 1620-1633, 2011

      32 M. Shuman, "Area and element size bias numerosity perception" Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) 6 (6): 777-777, 2006

      33 H. Barth, "Abstract number and arithmetic in preschool children" Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 (102): 14116-14121, 2005

      34 Qing Li, "A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Computer Technology on School Students’ Mathematics Learning" Springer Nature 22 (22): 215-243, 2010

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-03-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Journal of Child Studies KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.76 1.76 1.79
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.85 1.77 2.219 0.21
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼