RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      치매환자 보호자 부양 부담의 요인구조 : 보호자 부담 조사의 탐색적 요인분석과 확인적 요인분석 = Factor Structure of Burden in Dementia Caregivers : Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Zarit Burden Interview

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103540019

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective:Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) was the most commonly used measure of caregiver burden for demented older adults. The aim of this study was to investigate dimensions of caregiver burden through factor analysis of ZBI. Methods:The particip...

      Objective:Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) was the most commonly used measure of caregiver burden for demented older adults.
      The aim of this study was to investigate dimensions of caregiver burden through factor analysis of ZBI.
      Methods:The participants were 706 outpatients with dementia and their caregivers in Korea. We assessed the caregiver burden using the Korean version of ZBI. The participants were randomly divided into two groups, for the purpose of identifying the most optimal factor structure through exploratory factor analysis in group 1 (n=368) and confirmatory factor analysis in group 2 (n=338).
      Results:The results of exploratory factor analysis in group 1 suggested 3-factor structure, which was labeled ‘personal strain,’ ‘patient dependency,’ and ‘self-criticism.’ The confirmatory factor analysis results indicated the 3-factor structure which was discovered through exploratory factor analysis was the best-fitting model for explaining the caregiver burden in group 2.
      Conclusion:The current study has significant implications for advancing our understanding of ZBI as multidimensional burden scale. Furthermore, differentiating the dimensions may allow researchers to assess the effects of interventions more precisely.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 서 론
      • 대상 및 방법
      • 결 과
      • 서 론
      • 대상 및 방법
      • 결 과
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이형석, "치매 환자 보호자의 스트레스 평가: 기억 및 행동문제점검- 개정판(Revised-Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist: R-MBPC)과 부담조사(Burden Interview: BI)의 신뢰도 및 타당도" 한국임상심리학회 23 (23): 1029-1050, 2004

      2 구형모, "일상활동평가-복합(Seoul-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living ; S-IADL)의 신뢰도 및 타당도 연구" 대한신경정신의학회 43 (43): 189-199, 2004

      3 Lu L, "Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview:development, reliability and validity of the Chinese version" 63 : 730-734, 2009

      4 Cummings JL, "The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia" 44 : 2308-2314, 1994

      5 Choi SH, "The Korean version of the neuropsychiatric inventory: a scoring tool for neuropsychiatric disturbance in dementia patients" 15 : 609-615, 2000

      6 Morris JC, "The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules" 43 : 2412-2414, 1993

      7 Hébert R, "Reliability, validity and reference values of the Zarit Burden Interview for assessing informal caregivers of community-dwelling older persons with dementia" 19 : 494-507, 2000

      8 Zarit SH, "Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden" 20 : 649-655, 1980

      9 Cheah WK, "Multidimensionality of the Zarit Burden Interview across the severity spectrum of cognitive impairment: an Asian perspective" 24 : 1846-1854, 2012

      10 Zarit SH, "Instructions for the Burden Interview" Pennsylvania State University 1987

      1 이형석, "치매 환자 보호자의 스트레스 평가: 기억 및 행동문제점검- 개정판(Revised-Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist: R-MBPC)과 부담조사(Burden Interview: BI)의 신뢰도 및 타당도" 한국임상심리학회 23 (23): 1029-1050, 2004

      2 구형모, "일상활동평가-복합(Seoul-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living ; S-IADL)의 신뢰도 및 타당도 연구" 대한신경정신의학회 43 (43): 189-199, 2004

      3 Lu L, "Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview:development, reliability and validity of the Chinese version" 63 : 730-734, 2009

      4 Cummings JL, "The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia" 44 : 2308-2314, 1994

      5 Choi SH, "The Korean version of the neuropsychiatric inventory: a scoring tool for neuropsychiatric disturbance in dementia patients" 15 : 609-615, 2000

      6 Morris JC, "The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules" 43 : 2412-2414, 1993

      7 Hébert R, "Reliability, validity and reference values of the Zarit Burden Interview for assessing informal caregivers of community-dwelling older persons with dementia" 19 : 494-507, 2000

      8 Zarit SH, "Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden" 20 : 649-655, 1980

      9 Cheah WK, "Multidimensionality of the Zarit Burden Interview across the severity spectrum of cognitive impairment: an Asian perspective" 24 : 1846-1854, 2012

      10 Zarit SH, "Instructions for the Burden Interview" Pennsylvania State University 1987

      11 Werkander Harstäde C, "Guilt and shame--a semantic concept analysis of two concepts related to palliative care" 26 : 787-795, 2012

      12 Knight BG, "Factor structure of the burden interview" 6 : 249-258, 2000

      13 Whitlatch CJ, "Efficacy of interventions with caregivers: a reanalysis" 31 : 9-14, 1991

      14 Springate BA, "Dimensions of caregiver burden in dementia:impact of demographic, mood, and care recipient variables" 22 : 294-300, 2014

      15 Cheng ST, "Dimensionality of burden in Alzheimer caregivers: confirmatory factor analysis and correlates of the Zarit Burden interview" 26 : 1455-1463, 2014

      16 American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" American Psychiatric Association 1994

      17 Ghatavi K, "Defining guilt in depression: a comparison of subjects with major depression, chronic medical illness and healthy controls" 68 : 307-315, 2002

      18 Hu LT, "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives" 6 : 1-55, 1999

      19 Matsushita M, "Cross-cultural study of caregiver burden for Alzheimer’s disease in Japan and Taiwan: result from Dementia Research in Kumamoto and Tainan (DeReKaT)" 28 : 1125-1132, 2016

      20 Flynn Longmire CV, "Confirmatory factor analysis of a brief version of the Zarit Burden Interview in Black and White dementia caregivers" 51 : 453-462, 2011

      21 Salguero RH, "Caregivers of persons with Alzheimer’s disease: cultural differences in perceived caregiver burden in Guatemala and Rhode Island" 13 : 229-240, 1998

      22 George LK, "Caregiver well-being: a multidimensional examination of family caregivers of demented adults" 26 : 253-259, 1986

      23 Lau S, "Caregiver burden: looking beyond the unidimensional total score" 29 : 338-346, 2015

      24 Ankri J, "Beyond the global score of the Zarit Burden Interview: useful dimensions for clinicians" 20 : 254-260, 2005

      25 Kang YW, "A validity study on the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) in dementia patients" 15 : 300-308, 1997

      26 Ku HM, "A study on the reliability and validity of Seoul-Activities of Daily Living(SADL)" 8 : 206-214, 2004

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-02-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Korean Geriatirc Psychiatry -> Journal of Korean Geriatric Psychiatry KCI등재
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.19 0.19 0.22
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.31 0.28 0.593 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼