RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Pre-service elementary teachers’ generative AI-based mathematics lesson design and evaluation: A mixed-methods study using the extended UTAUT framework

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109927073

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This mixed-methods study investigated how pre-service elementary teachers engaged with generative AI during mathematics lesson design and how their perceptions—conceptualized through an extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)—were associated with instructional practices. The study addressed three research questions: (1) What factors underlie pre-service elementary teachers’ acceptance and behavioral intention toward generative AI, based on an extended UTAUT framework? (2) In the context of AI-supported lesson design, what types of questions do pre-service teachers pose, and how do they evaluate AI-generated responses? (3) How do pre-service teachers’ acceptance factors and behavioral intention levels relate to the types of questions they pose to generative AI and their evaluations of AI-generated responses? Fifty-three pre-service teachers completed a survey measuring seven UTAUT-related factors—performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, trust, perceived risk, moral obligation, and behavioral intention—and participated in AI-supported lesson design tasks. Qualitative analyses of prompts and evaluations were combined with quantitative comparisons across factor levels. Findings revealed distinct engagement patterns: higher performance expectancy and trust were linked to student-centered, purpose-driven prompts and greater recognition of diverse instructional resources in AI outputs, whereas lower behavioral intention corresponded to textbook-based prompts and less critical engagement. Across groups, participants typically articulated both positive and improvable aspects of AI-generated content, indicating evaluative processes grounded in pedagogical reasoning rather than simple acceptance or rejection. The study underscores the need for AI literacy in teacher education—encompassing not only technical proficiency but also the capacity to critically interpret, adapt, and align AI-generated content with curricular goals, learner needs, and contextual realities. While situated in the specific context of Korean first-grade mathematics, the findings offer transferable insights for broader subject areas and educational settings, highlighting the importance of context sensitive and pedagogically informed AI integration.
      번역하기

      This mixed-methods study investigated how pre-service elementary teachers engaged with generative AI during mathematics lesson design and how their perceptions—conceptualized through an extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UT...

      This mixed-methods study investigated how pre-service elementary teachers engaged with generative AI during mathematics lesson design and how their perceptions—conceptualized through an extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)—were associated with instructional practices. The study addressed three research questions: (1) What factors underlie pre-service elementary teachers’ acceptance and behavioral intention toward generative AI, based on an extended UTAUT framework? (2) In the context of AI-supported lesson design, what types of questions do pre-service teachers pose, and how do they evaluate AI-generated responses? (3) How do pre-service teachers’ acceptance factors and behavioral intention levels relate to the types of questions they pose to generative AI and their evaluations of AI-generated responses? Fifty-three pre-service teachers completed a survey measuring seven UTAUT-related factors—performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, trust, perceived risk, moral obligation, and behavioral intention—and participated in AI-supported lesson design tasks. Qualitative analyses of prompts and evaluations were combined with quantitative comparisons across factor levels. Findings revealed distinct engagement patterns: higher performance expectancy and trust were linked to student-centered, purpose-driven prompts and greater recognition of diverse instructional resources in AI outputs, whereas lower behavioral intention corresponded to textbook-based prompts and less critical engagement. Across groups, participants typically articulated both positive and improvable aspects of AI-generated content, indicating evaluative processes grounded in pedagogical reasoning rather than simple acceptance or rejection. The study underscores the need for AI literacy in teacher education—encompassing not only technical proficiency but also the capacity to critically interpret, adapt, and align AI-generated content with curricular goals, learner needs, and contextual realities. While situated in the specific context of Korean first-grade mathematics, the findings offer transferable insights for broader subject areas and educational settings, highlighting the importance of context sensitive and pedagogically informed AI integration.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼