휴대용 유도탄의 후방 안전영역 평가방법에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Evaluatioin Methods for the Rear Safety Zone of Portable Guided Missile

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Recoilless weapons, which lead strong back blast and impulse noise more than 160 dB, have been used in compliance with the regulation of the safety zone for the safe operations. However, the safety zone regulations for the newly developed weapons should be prepared since the existing guidelines do not provide any information concerning the reason for the safety zone. In this study, the outdoor launch tests were performed to collect the data such as noise, pressure and temperature of the back blast. An assessment method using data obtained from launch tests has been proposed to determine the safety zone. The safety zone has been determined with consideration for the following criteria: Impulse noise, temperature and pressure of the back blast and blast angle. As a results, new safety zones for them have been established for the recoilless weapon developed by ADD (Agency for Defense Development). We expect that this research can be used as a guideline for establishing a new safety zone regulation of similar weapon to be developed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Students Handout, "“Introduction to Antimechanized Weapons, Section I, II" United States Marine Corps, Basic Officer Course

2 American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, "Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices for Chemical Substances" 2012

3 Karl Buck, "Performance of Different Types of Hearing Protectors Undergoing High-Level Impulse Noise" 15 (15): 227-240, 2009

4 Occupational Safety and Health Administration, "Occupational Noise Exposure: Hearing Conservation Amendment" 1981

5 American National Standards Institute, "Methods for Measuring the Real-ear Attenuation of Hearing Protectors (Standard No. ANSI S12.6-1997)"

6 Headquarters, Department of the Army, "Javelin-close Combat Missle System" FM 3-22. 37 2013

7 Jane’s Defense Weekly, "Infantry Equipment, AT4 Making Headway in Confined Spaces" 1997

8 Dancer A, "Hearing Hazard from Impulse Noise: A Comparative Study of Two Classical Criteria for Weapon Noises (Pfander Criterion and Smoorenburg Criterion) and the LAeq8 Method" 3 : 539-547, 1995

9 Department of Defense Instruction, "Hearing Conservation Program" 2010

10 R. Karl Zipf, "Explosions and Refuge Chambers"

11 MIL-STD-1474D, "Department of Defense Design Criteria Standard, Noise Limits"

12 Pfander F, "Das Knalltrauma:Analyse, Vorbeugung, Diagnose, Behandlung, Prognose und Begutachtung" Springer-Verlag 1975

13 H.H. Chiu, "Blast-Noise Environment of Recoilless Rifle and Impulsive Rocket Fring. Part II"

14 H.H. Chiu, "Blast-Noise Environment of Impulsive Firing"

15 D.L. Jone, "Blast Overpressure Studies with Animals and Man(subtitle :Non-auditory Damage Risk Assessment for Simulated Weapon Fired from an Enclosure)" 1993

16 Jane’s Defense Weekly, "Anti-Armour Weapons, Making an impact" 2004

17 F.V. Bracco, "Air Shock Parameter and Design Criteria for Rocket Explosions"

18 International Organization for Standardization, "Acoustics-determination of Sound Im-missions from Sound Sources Placed Close to the Ears-part 1: Technique using Microphones in Real Ears (MIREtechnique)(Standard No. ISO 11904-1:2002)"

19 K. H. Song, "A Study of How to Evaluation of Impulse Noise Based on MIL-STD-1474D" 2014