RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      SCOPUS KCI등재

      한국인 폐확산능 정상예측식의 임상적 유용성과 정확성 = Clinical Usefulness and the Accuracy of Korean Reference Equation for Diffusing Capacity

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A5070231

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: Park et al. developed the Korean reference equation for the measurement of diffusing capacity in 1985. However, the equation has not been widely used in Korea and foreign reference equations have been popularly used. We intended to compare the clinical usefulness and the accuracy of the the Korean reference equation (Park`s equation) with that of the foreign equation (Burrows` equation) that is commonly used in Korea. Methods: 1. Evaluation of clinical usefulness; Among 1,584 patients who underwent diffusing capacity (DLCO) at the Asan Medical Center from July to December 2006, group A subjects included 276 patients who had different interpretations of DLCO in trials employing Burrows` equation and Park`s equation. Clinical assessment was decided by consensus of two respiratory physicians. In order to evaluate the clinical usefulness of Burrows` equation and Park`s equation, agreement of clinical assessment and DLCO interpretation were measured. 2. Evaluation of accuracy; Group B subjects were 81 patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and 39 normal subjects. The 81 ILD patients were diagnosed following a surgical lung biopsy. The accuracy of diagnosing ILD as well as sensitivity and specificity were evaluated according to the use of the reference equations (Burrows` equation and Park`s equation) for DLCO. Results: Agreement between clinical assessment and interpretation of DLCO was 22% for the use of Burrows` equation and 78% for the use of Park`s equation. The sensitivity and specificity of the Burrows` equation for diagnosing ILD were 64.2% and 100%. The sensitivity and specificity of the Park`s equation for diagnosing ILD were 90.1% and 100%. The sensitivity of the Park`s equation for diagnosing ILD was significantly higher than that of Burrows` equation (p<0.001). Conclusion: The Korean reference equation (Park`s equation) was more clinically useful and had higher sensitivity for diagnosing ILD than the foreign reference equation (Burrows` equation). (Tuberc Respir Dis 2008;64:80-86)
      번역하기

      Background: Park et al. developed the Korean reference equation for the measurement of diffusing capacity in 1985. However, the equation has not been widely used in Korea and foreign reference equations have been popularly used. We intended to compare...

      Background: Park et al. developed the Korean reference equation for the measurement of diffusing capacity in 1985. However, the equation has not been widely used in Korea and foreign reference equations have been popularly used. We intended to compare the clinical usefulness and the accuracy of the the Korean reference equation (Park`s equation) with that of the foreign equation (Burrows` equation) that is commonly used in Korea. Methods: 1. Evaluation of clinical usefulness; Among 1,584 patients who underwent diffusing capacity (DLCO) at the Asan Medical Center from July to December 2006, group A subjects included 276 patients who had different interpretations of DLCO in trials employing Burrows` equation and Park`s equation. Clinical assessment was decided by consensus of two respiratory physicians. In order to evaluate the clinical usefulness of Burrows` equation and Park`s equation, agreement of clinical assessment and DLCO interpretation were measured. 2. Evaluation of accuracy; Group B subjects were 81 patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and 39 normal subjects. The 81 ILD patients were diagnosed following a surgical lung biopsy. The accuracy of diagnosing ILD as well as sensitivity and specificity were evaluated according to the use of the reference equations (Burrows` equation and Park`s equation) for DLCO. Results: Agreement between clinical assessment and interpretation of DLCO was 22% for the use of Burrows` equation and 78% for the use of Park`s equation. The sensitivity and specificity of the Burrows` equation for diagnosing ILD were 64.2% and 100%. The sensitivity and specificity of the Park`s equation for diagnosing ILD were 90.1% and 100%. The sensitivity of the Park`s equation for diagnosing ILD was significantly higher than that of Burrows` equation (p<0.001). Conclusion: The Korean reference equation (Park`s equation) was more clinically useful and had higher sensitivity for diagnosing ILD than the foreign reference equation (Burrows` equation). (Tuberc Respir Dis 2008;64:80-86)

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 송은희, "우리나라 성인 폐용적 및 폐확산능 정상예측식의 선정" 대한결핵및호흡기학회 61 (61): 218-226, 2006

      2 Knudson RJ, "The effects of cigarette smoking and smoking cessation on the carbon monoxide diffusing capacity of the lung in asymptomatic subjects" 140 : 645-51, 1989

      3 Neas LM, "The determinants of pulmonary diffusing capacity in a national sample of U.S. adults" 153 : 656-64, 1996

      4 Crapo RO, "Standardized single breath normal values for carbon monoxide diffusing capacity" 123 : 185-9, 1981

      5 Quanjer PH, "Standardized of lung function testing. Report working party" 1-95, 1983

      6 American Thoracic Society, "Standardization of spirometry, 1994 update" 152 : 1107-36, 1995

      7 Roca J, "Single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity prediction equations from a Mediterranean population" 141 : 1026-32, 1990

      8 Stocks J, "Reference values for residual volume, functional residual capacity and total lung capacity. ATS Workshop on Lung Volume Measurements. Official Statement of The European Respiratory Society" 8 : 492-506, 1995

      9 Paoletti P, "Reference equations for the single-breath diffusing capacity. A cross-sectional analysis and effect of body size and age" 132 : 806-13, 1985

      10 Gold WM, "Pulmonary function testing" Elsevier Saunders 695-703, 2005

      1 송은희, "우리나라 성인 폐용적 및 폐확산능 정상예측식의 선정" 대한결핵및호흡기학회 61 (61): 218-226, 2006

      2 Knudson RJ, "The effects of cigarette smoking and smoking cessation on the carbon monoxide diffusing capacity of the lung in asymptomatic subjects" 140 : 645-51, 1989

      3 Neas LM, "The determinants of pulmonary diffusing capacity in a national sample of U.S. adults" 153 : 656-64, 1996

      4 Crapo RO, "Standardized single breath normal values for carbon monoxide diffusing capacity" 123 : 185-9, 1981

      5 Quanjer PH, "Standardized of lung function testing. Report working party" 1-95, 1983

      6 American Thoracic Society, "Standardization of spirometry, 1994 update" 152 : 1107-36, 1995

      7 Roca J, "Single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity prediction equations from a Mediterranean population" 141 : 1026-32, 1990

      8 Stocks J, "Reference values for residual volume, functional residual capacity and total lung capacity. ATS Workshop on Lung Volume Measurements. Official Statement of The European Respiratory Society" 8 : 492-506, 1995

      9 Paoletti P, "Reference equations for the single-breath diffusing capacity. A cross-sectional analysis and effect of body size and age" 132 : 806-13, 1985

      10 Gold WM, "Pulmonary function testing" Elsevier Saunders 695-703, 2005

      11 Park JO, "Normal predicted standards of single breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity of lung in healthy nonsmoking adults" 28 : 176-83, 1985

      12 Cotes JE, "Lung function" Blackwell scientific publications 1975

      13 Burrows B, "Clinical usefulness of the single-breath pulmonary diffusing capacity test" 84 : 789-806, 1961

      14 Crapo RO, "Carbon monoxide diffusing capacity" 10 : 187-98, 1989

      15 Weisell RC, "Body mass index as an indicator of obesity" 8 : 681-4, 2002

      16 Yang TS, "A review of the racial differences in the lung function of normal Caucasian, Chinese and Indian subjects" 4 : 872-80, 1991

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-07-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 결핵 및 호흡기질환 -> Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.21 0.21 0.2
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.19 0.15 0.475 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼