RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SSCI SCIE SCOPUS

    한국 성인의 품위 있는 죽음 측정도구 개발 및 평가 = Development and Evaluation of a Dignified Dying Scale for Korean Adults

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104233170

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose: The study was done to develop a dignified dying scale for Korean adults. Methods: The process included construction of a conceptual framework, generation of initial items, verification of content validity, selection of secondary items, preliminary study, and extraction of final items. The participants were 428 adults who lived in one of 3 Korean metropolitan cities: Seoul, Daegu, and Busan. Item analysis, factor analysis, criterion related validity, and internal consistency were used to analyze the data. Data collection was done from March to June 2010. Results: Thirty items were selected for the final scale, and categorized into 5 factors explaining 54.5% of the total variance. The factors were labeled as maintaining emotional comfort (10 items), arranging social relationship (9 items), avoiding suffering (3 items), maintaining autonomous decision making (4 items), and role preservation (4 items). The scores for the scale were significantly correlated with personal meanings of death scale. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the 30 items was .92. Conclusion: The above findings indicate that the dignified dying scale has a good validity and reliability when used with Korean adults.
    번역하기

    Purpose: The study was done to develop a dignified dying scale for Korean adults. Methods: The process included construction of a conceptual framework, generation of initial items, verification of content validity, selection of secondary items, prelim...

    Purpose: The study was done to develop a dignified dying scale for Korean adults. Methods: The process included construction of a conceptual framework, generation of initial items, verification of content validity, selection of secondary items, preliminary study, and extraction of final items. The participants were 428 adults who lived in one of 3 Korean metropolitan cities: Seoul, Daegu, and Busan. Item analysis, factor analysis, criterion related validity, and internal consistency were used to analyze the data. Data collection was done from March to June 2010. Results: Thirty items were selected for the final scale, and categorized into 5 factors explaining 54.5% of the total variance. The factors were labeled as maintaining emotional comfort (10 items), arranging social relationship (9 items), avoiding suffering (3 items), maintaining autonomous decision making (4 items), and role preservation (4 items). The scores for the scale were significantly correlated with personal meanings of death scale. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the 30 items was .92. Conclusion: The above findings indicate that the dignified dying scale has a good validity and reliability when used with Korean adults.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 조계화, "휴먼서비스 전공분야 대학생의 죽음태도 유형- Q 방법론적 접근 -" 한국간호과학회 35 (35): 829-841, 2005

    2 이윤정, "한국판 임종치료선호도(Preferences for Care Near the End of Life Scale-Korean Version: PCEOL-K)의 신뢰도 및 타당도" 한국의료윤리학회 12 (12): 29-42, 2009

    3 이현지, "노인의 죽음불안과 우울이 자살생각에 미치는 영향" 한국노년학회 26 (26): 717-731, 2006

    4 조계화, "간호대학생이 인식하는 품위 있는 죽음" 한국간호교육학회 16 (16): 72-82, 2010

    5 Abdel-Khalek, A. M, "Why do we fear death? The construction and validation of the reasons for death fear scale" 26 : 669-680, 2002

    6 Collett, L. J, "The fear of death and dying" 72 : 179-181, 1969

    7 Skevington, S. M, "Selecting national items for the WHOQOL: Conceptual and psychometric considerations" 48 : 473-487, 1999

    8 Ryu, C. S, "SPSS 14.0 for Windows (5th ed.)" Elite 2006

    9 Harville, M., "Relation of existential and religious variables to the death depression scale-revised" 48 : 165-184, 2004

    10 Anderberg, P, "Preserving dignity in caring for older adults: A concept analysis" 59 : 635-643, 2007

    1 조계화, "휴먼서비스 전공분야 대학생의 죽음태도 유형- Q 방법론적 접근 -" 한국간호과학회 35 (35): 829-841, 2005

    2 이윤정, "한국판 임종치료선호도(Preferences for Care Near the End of Life Scale-Korean Version: PCEOL-K)의 신뢰도 및 타당도" 한국의료윤리학회 12 (12): 29-42, 2009

    3 이현지, "노인의 죽음불안과 우울이 자살생각에 미치는 영향" 한국노년학회 26 (26): 717-731, 2006

    4 조계화, "간호대학생이 인식하는 품위 있는 죽음" 한국간호교육학회 16 (16): 72-82, 2010

    5 Abdel-Khalek, A. M, "Why do we fear death? The construction and validation of the reasons for death fear scale" 26 : 669-680, 2002

    6 Collett, L. J, "The fear of death and dying" 72 : 179-181, 1969

    7 Skevington, S. M, "Selecting national items for the WHOQOL: Conceptual and psychometric considerations" 48 : 473-487, 1999

    8 Ryu, C. S, "SPSS 14.0 for Windows (5th ed.)" Elite 2006

    9 Harville, M., "Relation of existential and religious variables to the death depression scale-revised" 48 : 165-184, 2004

    10 Anderberg, P, "Preserving dignity in caring for older adults: A concept analysis" 59 : 635-643, 2007

    11 Gauthier, D. M, "Preference for care near the end of life: scale development and validation" 24 : 298-306, 2001

    12 Holcomb, L. E, "Personal meanings of death: A content analysis of free response narratives" 17 : 299-318, 1993

    13 Cicirelli, V. G, "Personal meanings of death in relation to fear of death" 22 : 713-733, 1998

    14 Lee, E. O, "Nursing Research and Statistical Analysis" Soomoonsa 2009

    15 Greyson, B, "Near-death experiences, In Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence" American Psychological Association 315-352, 2001

    16 Lee, H. S, "Korean dictionary" Minjungsearim 2008

    17 Corless, I. B, "Issues in cross-cultural quality of life research" 33 : 15-20, 2001

    18 Leung, D, "Granting death with dignity: Patient, family and professional perspectives" 13 : 170-174, 2007

    19 Chochinov, H. M, "Dying, dignity, and new horizons in palliative end-of-life care" 56 : 84-103, 2006

    20 Proulx, K, "Dying with dignity: The good patient versus the good death" 21 : 116-120, 2004

    21 Jacobson, N, "Dignity and health: A review" 64 : 292-302, 2007

    22 Doorenbos, A. Z, "Dignifi-ed dying: A phenomenon and actions among nurses in India" 53 : 28-33, 2006

    23 Lynn, M. R, "Determination and quantification of content validity" 35 : 382-385, 1986

    24 Pullman, D, "Death, dignity and moral nonsense" 20 : 171-178, 2004

    25 Kim, C. S, "Constitutional law. (18th ed.)" Pakyoungsa 2008

    26 Kwon, Y. S, "Constitutional law" Bobmunsa 2008

    27 Kei, H. Y, "Constitutional law" Pakyoungsa 2005

    28 Kwon, B. G., "Bioethics & law" Ewha Womans University Press 2009

    29 Curtis, J. R., "A measure of the quality of dying and death: Initial validation using after-death interviews with family members" 24 : 17-31, 2002

    30 Jacelon, C. S, "A concept analysis of dignity for older adults" 48 : 76-83, 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-11-07 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한간호학회지 -> Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 SSCI 등재 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (등재유지) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-02-25 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한간호학회 -> 한국간호과학회
    영문명 : Korean Academy Of Nursing -> Korean Society of Nursing Science
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.24 1.62
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.52 1.55 2.24 0.21
    더보기
    해외이동버튼