도시관리계획의 결정과정분석과 제도개선방안에 관한 연구 = (An) analysis of city planning processes and the improvement of municipal laws pertaining to city management planning

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this research is to analyze city planning processes and to improve municipal laws pertaining to city management planning in Korea.
This research consists of a theoretical and an empirical review of city planning, a survey and an analysis of the views of city planning officers and city planners, and suggestions for improvement of municipal laws pertaining to city management planning.
The complete this research, a survey was administrated to city planning officers and city planners about city planning processes. The results of the survey are as follows:
- 63% of the total respondents indicated institutional problems of city management planning such as the self-interests of residents, coordination of mutual interests, and a lack of supervision.
- Respondents see the city planning committee as having several operational problems. One is that the committee has limited information and time. Also, the contents of the plan are confusing and complex, in particular as regarding the public's misunderstanding of it.
- According to the case studies of the Dadae and Manduk Districts, the survey revealed that decision-making has been unclear, there is a lack of clear principles and criteria for zoning, there has been political pressure (in particular from the mayor), and a lack of coordination.
- The respondents provided suggestions of how to deliver effective city planning information, for example, mass communication such as newspapers, broadcasting, and the Internet.
- 71% of the respondents suggested there be a public explanation preliminary to public hearings early in the city planning stage to explain the city's vision and any new zoning proposals.
The results of the research regarding the improvement of municipal laws pertaining to city management planning are as follows:
- the results indicate that a preliminary explanation meeting, prior to public hearings would enhance the overall city planing process.
- the results suggest that an independent planning committee replace the government - directed city planning committee.
- the results indicate there needs to be more public access to city planning documents and to improve & encourage citizen's participation by utilizing the Internet.
As the survey sample was small, the results have a problem of statistical significance. Also the results are limited in that the survey did most include ordinary citizens.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
• 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 3
• 제2장 국내ㆍ외 도시계획제도 고찰 = 6
• 제1절 도시계획제도 개요 = 6
• 1. 도시계획의 개념 = 6
• 2. 도시계획의 유형 = 7
• 3. 도시계획제도의 변천과정 = 9
• 제2절 한국의 도시계획제도 = 12
• 1. 도시계획 법규 = 12
• 2. 도시계획결정 제도 = 13
• 3. 주민참여 제도 = 18
• 제3절 외국의 도시계획제도 = 22
• 1. 미국의 조닝(Zoning) 제도 = 22
• 2. 일본의 마찌즈꾸리 계획 = 29
• 3. 영국의 도시기본계획 = 33
• 제3장 도시관리계획 결정과정 분석 = 44
• 제1절 도시계획 결정과정 사례 = 44
• 1. 도시기본계획 변경 = 45
• 2. 용도지역 변경 = 46
• 3. 지구단위계획 변경 = 48
• 4. 도시계획시설 변경 = 49
• 제2절 용도지역 변경과정 : 다대ㆍ만덕지구를 사례로 = 50
• 1. 다대ㆍ만덕지구 사건의 개요 = 50
• 2. 다대ㆍ만덕지구 용도지역 변경 과정 = 53
• 3. 변경과정에서 제기된 문제점 = 57
• 제3절 도시계획 결정과정의 문제점 = 60
• 1. 조사의 개요 = 60
• 2. 도시계획 결정과정의 문제점 = 61
• 3. 용도지역 결정과정의 문제점 = 66
• 제4장 도시관리계획 제도개선방안 = 72
• 제1절 현행 도시계획제도의 운영개선방안 = 72
• 1. 도시계획 결정절차 = 72
• 2. 도시계획위원회 = 73
• 3. 공청회 = 75
• 4. 공람 = 78
• 5. 정보전달방법 = 79
• 제2절 새로운 도시계획제도의 개선방안 = 82
• 1. 새로운 제도도입의 필요성 = 82
• 2. 공개적인 토의의 장 마련 = 82
• 3. 조정전담기구의 도입 = 84
• 4. 사전적 계획을 통한 합의과정 = 85
• 제5장 결론 및 정책적 함의 = 89
• Abstract = 92
• <부록> 도시계획 결정과정에 관한 조사 설문지 = 95
• 참고문헌 = 99
• 감사의 글 = 105