In the 1980s, as urban development projects gained momentum, they prioritized quantity over quality, which also had an impact on parks donated. Overlooking their role as public assets, these donation-funded parks faced issues such as development on le...
In the 1980s, as urban development projects gained momentum, they prioritized quantity over quality, which also had an impact on parks donated. Overlooking their role as public assets, these donation-funded parks faced issues such as development on leftover land and neglect of maintenance. To address these problems, this study aims to restructure evaluation criteria, with a focus on the most frequently used indicators: accessibility, openness, safety, pleasantness, and convenience, which have been highlighted in prior research as key aspects of publicness. The goal is to propose a framework for evaluating the state of donation-funded parks across different time periods, contributing to their improvement.