RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      음향자극검사를 이용한 진통중 태아 안녕 평가의 효용성 = A Critical Appraisal of Fetal Acoustic Stimulation as an Intrapartal Test for Fetal Well-being

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3358919

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study was undertaken at the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University College of Medicine from March through August at 1988. In order to evaluate the fetal well-being during intrapartum, 125 patients with 48 cases of high risk pregnancy, 77 cases with normal pregnancy were assessed with Acoustic stimulation test(AST) immediately followed by Admission test(AT) of intrapartal fetal monitoring and the following data were observed. 1. According to the indications, PROM was most frequent with 21 cases, post-term pregnancy 4 cases, preterm labor 3 cases as decreasing in order and the 77 cases for the control group. 2. The incidence of reactivity on each tests were 86.4% for the acoustic stimulation test, 52.8% for the admission test. 3. Perinatal morbidity was assessed with use of low Apgar score. The 1 minute low Apgar score was 25.9% for the AST reactive and the 24.2% for the AT reactive group. For the nonreactive groups its were 41.2% and 32.2% respectively. The 5 minute low Apgar score, the both reactive groups revealed 1.9% and 1.5% respectively, but in the AST nonreactive group showed three times high perinatal morbidity than AT nonreactive group as 23.5% to 8.5%(p<0.01). 4. The incidence of fetal distress during labor, in AST reactive group is 25.9% and nonreactive group is 76.5% and the difference is statistically significant(p<0.01). For the AT reactive group 21.2% and for the nonreactive group 45.8% were observed and the difference is statistically significant(p<0.01). 5. Diagnostic accuracy of AST and AT in the prediction of intrapartal fetal distress were, sensitivity for the AST and AT were 31.7% and 65.8% respectively. The specificity for the AST and AT were 95.2% and 61.9% respectively. The positive predictive value for the AST and AT were 76.5 and 45.8% respectively. The negative predictive value for the AST and AT were 74.1% and 78.8% respectively. 6. Cesarean section rate, fetal distress and the perinatal morbidity were compared to the different result of AT in relation to reacive and nonreactive AST. Both reactive in AT and AST group and the AT nonreactive and AST reactive group showed low incidence of cesarean section rate compared to the both AT and AST nonreactive group as 3.0%, 2.4% and 11.8% respectively and the difference was not significant. The incidence of the fetal distress was high in the both AT and AST nonreactive group comared to the AT reactive group as 52.9%, 31.0% and 15.1% respectively(p<0.05). 5 minute low Apgar score was highly noted in both AT and AST nonreactive group compared to the AT nonreactive and AST reactive group and the both AT and AST reactive group as 23.5%, 2.4% and 1.5% respectively(p<0.01).
      번역하기

      This study was undertaken at the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University College of Medicine from March through August at 1988. In order to evaluate the fetal well-being during intrapartum, 125 patients with 48 cases of high risk pr...

      This study was undertaken at the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University College of Medicine from March through August at 1988. In order to evaluate the fetal well-being during intrapartum, 125 patients with 48 cases of high risk pregnancy, 77 cases with normal pregnancy were assessed with Acoustic stimulation test(AST) immediately followed by Admission test(AT) of intrapartal fetal monitoring and the following data were observed. 1. According to the indications, PROM was most frequent with 21 cases, post-term pregnancy 4 cases, preterm labor 3 cases as decreasing in order and the 77 cases for the control group. 2. The incidence of reactivity on each tests were 86.4% for the acoustic stimulation test, 52.8% for the admission test. 3. Perinatal morbidity was assessed with use of low Apgar score. The 1 minute low Apgar score was 25.9% for the AST reactive and the 24.2% for the AT reactive group. For the nonreactive groups its were 41.2% and 32.2% respectively. The 5 minute low Apgar score, the both reactive groups revealed 1.9% and 1.5% respectively, but in the AST nonreactive group showed three times high perinatal morbidity than AT nonreactive group as 23.5% to 8.5%(p<0.01). 4. The incidence of fetal distress during labor, in AST reactive group is 25.9% and nonreactive group is 76.5% and the difference is statistically significant(p<0.01). For the AT reactive group 21.2% and for the nonreactive group 45.8% were observed and the difference is statistically significant(p<0.01). 5. Diagnostic accuracy of AST and AT in the prediction of intrapartal fetal distress were, sensitivity for the AST and AT were 31.7% and 65.8% respectively. The specificity for the AST and AT were 95.2% and 61.9% respectively. The positive predictive value for the AST and AT were 76.5 and 45.8% respectively. The negative predictive value for the AST and AT were 74.1% and 78.8% respectively. 6. Cesarean section rate, fetal distress and the perinatal morbidity were compared to the different result of AT in relation to reacive and nonreactive AST. Both reactive in AT and AST group and the AT nonreactive and AST reactive group showed low incidence of cesarean section rate compared to the both AT and AST nonreactive group as 3.0%, 2.4% and 11.8% respectively and the difference was not significant. The incidence of the fetal distress was high in the both AT and AST nonreactive group comared to the AT reactive group as 52.9%, 31.0% and 15.1% respectively(p<0.05). 5 minute low Apgar score was highly noted in both AT and AST nonreactive group compared to the AT nonreactive and AST reactive group and the both AT and AST reactive group as 23.5%, 2.4% and 1.5% respectively(p<0.01).

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼