RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    북한의 유엔 군축결의안 투표 성향에 관한 분석 = North Korea`s Voting Behaviors of Resolution on Disarmament in the UN General Assembly

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101892251

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this paper is to analyze the North Korea``s voting patterns of resolution on disarmament and arms control in the UN General Assembly from 1991 to 2004. Among the international disarmament and arms control agreements, 1925 Geneva Protocol, Biological Weapon Convention, ENMOD Convention and Antarctic Treaty are acceded by North Korea. And North Korea announced, on 10 January 2003, that it was withdrawing from the NPT. The main characteristics of North Korea`` voting behaviors of disarmament resolution are as follows: First, North Korea has tried to assure her security against the use or threat to use nuclear weapons of U.S. Second, the aim of North Korea is to protect her military power and military deterrence from the international disarmament measures. Third, North Korea trends to vote in concert with the international opinion and the atmosphere of the international society regardless of her real intention. Fourth, there are inconsistency and duplicity in North Korea`` voting patterns and behaviors. The UN system and international disarmament and arms control agreements are worthy of utilization for the international disarmament and arms control on the Korean Peninsula. First, it can offer the objectives, universal standard and framework in the process of negotiation and implementation for the international disarmament and arms control on the Korean Peninsula. Second, those regime can be utilized as a useful means to restrict the WMD and to reduce the conventional weapons of North Korea. Third, it must play a role of reinforcement and strengthening the disarmament and arms control regimes on the Korean Peninsula through the support and security assurance of power on it.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this paper is to analyze the North Korea``s voting patterns of resolution on disarmament and arms control in the UN General Assembly from 1991 to 2004. Among the international disarmament and arms control agreements, 1925 Geneva Protoco...

    The purpose of this paper is to analyze the North Korea``s voting patterns of resolution on disarmament and arms control in the UN General Assembly from 1991 to 2004. Among the international disarmament and arms control agreements, 1925 Geneva Protocol, Biological Weapon Convention, ENMOD Convention and Antarctic Treaty are acceded by North Korea. And North Korea announced, on 10 January 2003, that it was withdrawing from the NPT. The main characteristics of North Korea`` voting behaviors of disarmament resolution are as follows: First, North Korea has tried to assure her security against the use or threat to use nuclear weapons of U.S. Second, the aim of North Korea is to protect her military power and military deterrence from the international disarmament measures. Third, North Korea trends to vote in concert with the international opinion and the atmosphere of the international society regardless of her real intention. Fourth, there are inconsistency and duplicity in North Korea`` voting patterns and behaviors. The UN system and international disarmament and arms control agreements are worthy of utilization for the international disarmament and arms control on the Korean Peninsula. First, it can offer the objectives, universal standard and framework in the process of negotiation and implementation for the international disarmament and arms control on the Korean Peninsula. Second, those regime can be utilized as a useful means to restrict the WMD and to reduce the conventional weapons of North Korea. Third, it must play a role of reinforcement and strengthening the disarmament and arms control regimes on the Korean Peninsula through the support and security assurance of power on it.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이철기, "군사안보정책의 전개와 군축방안" 서울: 인간사랑 2002

    2 "The UN Disarmament Yearbook 1991; 1992; 1993; 1994; 1995; 1996; 1997; 1998; 1999; 2000; 2001; 2002; 2003; 2004" 2005

    3 "SIPRI Yearbook 2005" New York: Oxford University Press 2005

    4 Bernauer, "Nuclear Issues on the Agenda of the Conference on Disarmament" UN Institute for Disarmament Research 1991

    5 Du Preez, J, "North Korea's withdrawal from the NPT: A Reality Check" 9April2003

    1 이철기, "군사안보정책의 전개와 군축방안" 서울: 인간사랑 2002

    2 "The UN Disarmament Yearbook 1991; 1992; 1993; 1994; 1995; 1996; 1997; 1998; 1999; 2000; 2001; 2002; 2003; 2004" 2005

    3 "SIPRI Yearbook 2005" New York: Oxford University Press 2005

    4 Bernauer, "Nuclear Issues on the Agenda of the Conference on Disarmament" UN Institute for Disarmament Research 1991

    5 Du Preez, J, "North Korea's withdrawal from the NPT: A Reality Check" 9April2003

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.8 0.8 0.84
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.87 1.29 1.221 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼