RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      독일의 법학교육, 상사법교육 및 시사점 = The legal education system in germany and its suggestions

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101613213

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Nowadays the legal education system plays very important role internationally. The competitiveness of one country depends on such a legal education system. In the field of commercial law the confusion of legal systems of civil law and common law show its characteristic. The two principal legal systems in the world today are those of civil law and common law. Continental Europe, Latin America, most of Africa and many Central European and Asian nations are part of the civil law system. The United States, along with England and other countries once part of the British Empire, belong to the common law system. The civil law system has its roots in ancient Roman law. The common law system began developing in England almost a millennium ago. By the time England's Parliament was established, its royal judges had already begun basing their decisions on customary law “common” to the realm. A body of decisions was accumulating. Able lawyers assisted the process. On the European continent,Justinian’s resurrected law-books and the legal system of the Catholic Church played critical roles in harmonizing a thousand local laws. We should find out the differences between both legal systems. It is often said that the common law system consists of unwritten “judge-made” law while the civil law system is composed of written codes. For the most part, law in the United States today is “made” by the legislative branch. To some extent, however, the judge-made law analogy is true. But it would be incorrect to say that common law is unwritten law. At the same time, not all law in civil law countries is codified in the sense that it is organized into a comprehensive organic, whole statement of the law on a given subject.
      Sometimes individual statutes are enacted to deal with specific issues without being codified. Because of globalisierung of law the both legal systems are nearing rapidly. Therefore we should reflect how the both legal systems will be integrated in korean law and legal system. Corporate law is one important example that shows the integration and similarity, especially after the IMF accident in 1997, 1998. Germany has reformed several times commercial law, especially corporate law in recent times. To make establishing corporate easier, germany allowed 1 EURO limited liability company. This trend is similar to korean reform and reform plan.
      In this sense korean legal system is based on continental civil law system.
      But the law school is in the near of common law and case based legal system. Nevertheless after beginning of law school in 2009 the korean legal system would not change to anglo-american common law system rapidly.
      But cases and case study will be more important. In korea the teaching method is based on continental theory based method. Recently court cases play very important role in learning and also teaching. But the students will not question actively during the lecture. It should be therefore reformed.
      The german legal education system will give us good suggestions, because we belong to continental civil law based country. Case study is important,but legal theories should also not be neglected.
      번역하기

      Nowadays the legal education system plays very important role internationally. The competitiveness of one country depends on such a legal education system. In the field of commercial law the confusion of legal systems of civil law and common law show ...

      Nowadays the legal education system plays very important role internationally. The competitiveness of one country depends on such a legal education system. In the field of commercial law the confusion of legal systems of civil law and common law show its characteristic. The two principal legal systems in the world today are those of civil law and common law. Continental Europe, Latin America, most of Africa and many Central European and Asian nations are part of the civil law system. The United States, along with England and other countries once part of the British Empire, belong to the common law system. The civil law system has its roots in ancient Roman law. The common law system began developing in England almost a millennium ago. By the time England's Parliament was established, its royal judges had already begun basing their decisions on customary law “common” to the realm. A body of decisions was accumulating. Able lawyers assisted the process. On the European continent,Justinian’s resurrected law-books and the legal system of the Catholic Church played critical roles in harmonizing a thousand local laws. We should find out the differences between both legal systems. It is often said that the common law system consists of unwritten “judge-made” law while the civil law system is composed of written codes. For the most part, law in the United States today is “made” by the legislative branch. To some extent, however, the judge-made law analogy is true. But it would be incorrect to say that common law is unwritten law. At the same time, not all law in civil law countries is codified in the sense that it is organized into a comprehensive organic, whole statement of the law on a given subject.
      Sometimes individual statutes are enacted to deal with specific issues without being codified. Because of globalisierung of law the both legal systems are nearing rapidly. Therefore we should reflect how the both legal systems will be integrated in korean law and legal system. Corporate law is one important example that shows the integration and similarity, especially after the IMF accident in 1997, 1998. Germany has reformed several times commercial law, especially corporate law in recent times. To make establishing corporate easier, germany allowed 1 EURO limited liability company. This trend is similar to korean reform and reform plan.
      In this sense korean legal system is based on continental civil law system.
      But the law school is in the near of common law and case based legal system. Nevertheless after beginning of law school in 2009 the korean legal system would not change to anglo-american common law system rapidly.
      But cases and case study will be more important. In korea the teaching method is based on continental theory based method. Recently court cases play very important role in learning and also teaching. But the students will not question actively during the lecture. It should be therefore reformed.
      The german legal education system will give us good suggestions, because we belong to continental civil law based country. Case study is important,but legal theories should also not be neglected.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김건식, "회사법연구Ⅰ" 도서출판 소화 2010

      2 이철송, "회사법강의, 제18판" 박영사 2010

      3 이기수, "회사법, 제8판" 박영사 2009

      4 정동윤, "회사법, 제7판" 법문사 2001

      5 최준선, "회사법, 제5판" 삼영사 2010

      6 김정호, "회사법" 법문사 2010

      7 조규창, "한국법문화발전에 미친 독일법의 영향" (14) : 2003

      8 조규창, "한국민법과 독일민법의 관계" (4) : 1983

      9 전국경제인연합회, "주요국 회사법" 2009

      10 홍복기, "주식회사법(판례와 이론)" 박영사 2010

      1 김건식, "회사법연구Ⅰ" 도서출판 소화 2010

      2 이철송, "회사법강의, 제18판" 박영사 2010

      3 이기수, "회사법, 제8판" 박영사 2009

      4 정동윤, "회사법, 제7판" 법문사 2001

      5 최준선, "회사법, 제5판" 삼영사 2010

      6 김정호, "회사법" 법문사 2010

      7 조규창, "한국법문화발전에 미친 독일법의 영향" (14) : 2003

      8 조규창, "한국민법과 독일민법의 관계" (4) : 1983

      9 전국경제인연합회, "주요국 회사법" 2009

      10 홍복기, "주식회사법(판례와 이론)" 박영사 2010

      11 강대섭, "이사의 보수의 적정성 규제에 관한 쟁점과 판례의 검토, In 「세계화시대의 기업법」, 이기수 선생 정년기념논문집" 2010

      12 정성숙, "이사보수의 공개에 관한 독일과 우리나라의 입법동향" 법학연구소 (18) : 287-326, 2010

      13 유주선, "유럽연합의 중소기업법 동화를 위한 유럽 유한회사법(안)과 한국의 중소기업법제에 대한 시사점 -회사의 자본, 기관 및 사원의 법적 관계를 중심으로" 법학연구소 (18) : 327-355, 2010

      14 이기수, "어음·수표법, 제7판" 박영사 2009

      15 최기원, "상법학신론(상), 제18판" 박영사 2009

      16 이기수, "상법총칙·상행위법, 제7판" 박영사 2010

      17 손진화, "상법강의, 제2판" 신조사 2010

      18 정찬형, "상법강의(상), 제13판" 박영사 2010

      19 송옥렬, "상법강의" 홍문사 2011

      20 손주찬, "상법(상), 제13정증보판" 박영사 2002

      21 이기수, "보험·해상법, 제8판" 박영사 2008

      22 전국경제인연합회, "모범회사법" 2010

      23 하태영, "독일의 법학전문교육과 법조인양성" 법학연구소 (39) : 161-185, 2007

      24 서을오, "독일의 법학교육과 평가" 1 : 2006

      25 성승제, "독일의 “이사보수 적정화에 관한 법률” 제정 동향" 한국법제연구원 2010

      26 안병직, "독일연방공화국 60년. 1949~2009 분단국가에서 민주통일국가로" 도서출판 오름 2009

      27 이시우, "독일에서의 법학교육의 현황과 전망" 1995

      28 손주찬, "독일상법이 한국상법에 미친 영향" (14) : 2003

      29 조규창, "독일법사(상)" 2010

      30 김형배, "독일민법의 계수" (15) : 2004

      31 정쾌영, "독일 주주포럼제도의 도입에 관한 연구" 한국기업법학회 22 (22): 215-245, 2008

      32 최갑선, "독일 법학교육의 내용과 방법" (12) : 1995

      33 이상돈, "기초법학" 법문사 2008

      34 조지현, "경영판단원칙 - 독일 주식법 내용을 중심으로 -" 한국경영법률학회 21 (21): 159-185, 2010

      35 Zöllner, "Wertpapierrecht. 14. Aufl. München"

      36 Müller-Christmann, "Wertpapierrecht" 1992

      37 Baumbach, "Wechselgesetz und Scheckgesetz. 17.Aufl. München"

      38 Rüffer/Halbach/Schimikowski, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz" Baden-Baden 2009

      39 Hueck/Canaris, "Recht der Wertpapiere, 12.Aufl. München"

      40 Raiser/Veil, "Recht der Kapitalgesellschaften, 5. Aufl., München"

      41 Canaris, "Handelsrecht. 24.Aufl. München"

      42 Baumbach/Hopt, "Handelsgesetzbuch. 33.Aufl. München"

      43 Schmidt, "Gesellschaftsrecht, 4. Aufl., Köln, Berlin, Bonn, München"

      44 Larenz/Wolf, "Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts. 8. Aufl. München"

      45 Wolf/Lindacher/Pfeiffer, "AGB-Recht. 5. Aufl., München"

      46 이필규, "2009 독일보험계약법(VVG)" 세창출판사 2009

      47 유주선, "2008년 독일 유한회사법의 개정과 시사점" 한국상사판례학회 22 (22): 109-145, 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-05-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> KOREAN COMMERCIAL LAW ASSOCIATION KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-18 학술지등록 한글명 : 상사법연구
      외국어명 : 미등록
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1 1 1.07
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.96 0.93 0.979 0.58
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼