RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    보행 시 발 유형에 따른 발 운동학적 특성과 하지 근활성도 비교 = Comparison of Foot Kinematics and Lower Limb Muscle Activity Based on Foot Type During Gait

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110120364

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    PURPOSE Previous research has rarely examined foot segment motion and muscle activity simultaneously in relation to foot type. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate how foot type influences segmental foot kinematics and lower limb biomechanics during walking. METHODS Fifty-eight healthy adults were sorted into normal group (NG), pes planus group (PPG), or pes cavus group (PCG) using the Foot Posture Index, navicular drop, normalized navicular height, and normalized instep height. Furthermore, three-dimensional foot kinematics and lower limb muscle activity were recorded during 12-meter, self-paced walking using an optical motion capture system and surface electromyography. Kinematic analysis during the stance phase included measurement of joint angles and ranges of motion (ROM) for the following segments: foot relative to the shank, forefoot relative to the midfoot, lateral forefoot relative to the midfoot, medial forefoot relative to the midfoot, and hallux relative to the medial forefoot. Moreover, muscle activity analysis included the tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, and medial and lateral heads of the gastrocnemius.
    RESULTS Compared with the NG and PPG, the PCG exhibited greater ROMs in the frontal plane for the forefoot relative to the midfoot and medial forefoot relative to the midfoot. Additionally, the PPG exhibited a greater ROM in the frontal plane for the hallux relative to the medial forefoot compared with the NG. The intersegmental angles according to foot type demonstrated distinct kinematic differences between the PPG and NG in the transverse plane, specifically in the forefoot relative to the midfoot and medial forefoot relative to the midfoot relationships. However, no significant differences were observed in lower limb muscle activity during the stance phase. CONCLUSIONS This study provides insights into kinematic changes according to foot type during walking. Moreover, the findings of this study may deepen our understanding of the intrinsic risk factors for lower extremity injuries and tissue stress associated with variations in foot type.
    번역하기

    PURPOSE Previous research has rarely examined foot segment motion and muscle activity simultaneously in relation to foot type. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate how foot type influences segmental foot kinematics and lower limb biomechanics du...

    PURPOSE Previous research has rarely examined foot segment motion and muscle activity simultaneously in relation to foot type. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate how foot type influences segmental foot kinematics and lower limb biomechanics during walking. METHODS Fifty-eight healthy adults were sorted into normal group (NG), pes planus group (PPG), or pes cavus group (PCG) using the Foot Posture Index, navicular drop, normalized navicular height, and normalized instep height. Furthermore, three-dimensional foot kinematics and lower limb muscle activity were recorded during 12-meter, self-paced walking using an optical motion capture system and surface electromyography. Kinematic analysis during the stance phase included measurement of joint angles and ranges of motion (ROM) for the following segments: foot relative to the shank, forefoot relative to the midfoot, lateral forefoot relative to the midfoot, medial forefoot relative to the midfoot, and hallux relative to the medial forefoot. Moreover, muscle activity analysis included the tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, and medial and lateral heads of the gastrocnemius.
    RESULTS Compared with the NG and PPG, the PCG exhibited greater ROMs in the frontal plane for the forefoot relative to the midfoot and medial forefoot relative to the midfoot. Additionally, the PPG exhibited a greater ROM in the frontal plane for the hallux relative to the medial forefoot compared with the NG. The intersegmental angles according to foot type demonstrated distinct kinematic differences between the PPG and NG in the transverse plane, specifically in the forefoot relative to the midfoot and medial forefoot relative to the midfoot relationships. However, no significant differences were observed in lower limb muscle activity during the stance phase. CONCLUSIONS This study provides insights into kinematic changes according to foot type during walking. Moreover, the findings of this study may deepen our understanding of the intrinsic risk factors for lower extremity injuries and tissue stress associated with variations in foot type.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼