RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      사우디아라비아 왕실충성위원회법과 왕위계승자 선출에 관한 연구 = A Study on Allegiance Commission Statute and The Process of Selecting a Crown Prince in Saudi Arabia

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Recently, studies related to the succession to the throne in Saudi Arabia have also been made in Korea, but only at the minimum level. And even these studies do not cover in detail the Allegiance Commission itself. In this study, the analysis will be focused mainly on the untouched study of the Allegiance Commission itself and the specific characteristics of the Allegiance Commission Statute rather than the usual study of the internal power struggle or the possibility of changes in the process of succession to the throne among Saudi royal families. This will help to deepen one`s understanding of the content and outcome of previous studies and analyze the future disorder that is likely to occur in the process of succession to the throne in Saudi Arabia. The Allegiance Commission Statute is the core of the Saudi Arabian monarchy. This is because the decision for the royal succession is defined by this law. Article 5, Section 3 of Saudi Arabia`s basic law of governance prohibits the dogmatic selection of the Crown Prince by defining the process of selecting the Crown Prince according to the Allegiance Commission Statute. As Sultan Bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud, appointed as Crown Prince in 2005, died in 6 years in 2011, his brother Naif took over as Crown Prince and again he himself passed away in just 8 months. Since the aging of the future crown prince candidates has exceeded its limits, ie., Salman Bin Abdul Aziz being selected as the new Crown Prince, the decision for the Saudi royal family seems to have finished preparing transfer over to the next generation. However, the instability out of the process and the ongoing democratic awakening throughout the region are threatening even the fate of the pro-American Saudi Arabian kingdom.
      번역하기

      Recently, studies related to the succession to the throne in Saudi Arabia have also been made in Korea, but only at the minimum level. And even these studies do not cover in detail the Allegiance Commission itself. In this study, the analysis will be ...

      Recently, studies related to the succession to the throne in Saudi Arabia have also been made in Korea, but only at the minimum level. And even these studies do not cover in detail the Allegiance Commission itself. In this study, the analysis will be focused mainly on the untouched study of the Allegiance Commission itself and the specific characteristics of the Allegiance Commission Statute rather than the usual study of the internal power struggle or the possibility of changes in the process of succession to the throne among Saudi royal families. This will help to deepen one`s understanding of the content and outcome of previous studies and analyze the future disorder that is likely to occur in the process of succession to the throne in Saudi Arabia. The Allegiance Commission Statute is the core of the Saudi Arabian monarchy. This is because the decision for the royal succession is defined by this law. Article 5, Section 3 of Saudi Arabia`s basic law of governance prohibits the dogmatic selection of the Crown Prince by defining the process of selecting the Crown Prince according to the Allegiance Commission Statute. As Sultan Bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud, appointed as Crown Prince in 2005, died in 6 years in 2011, his brother Naif took over as Crown Prince and again he himself passed away in just 8 months. Since the aging of the future crown prince candidates has exceeded its limits, ie., Salman Bin Abdul Aziz being selected as the new Crown Prince, the decision for the Saudi royal family seems to have finished preparing transfer over to the next generation. However, the instability out of the process and the ongoing democratic awakening throughout the region are threatening even the fate of the pro-American Saudi Arabian kingdom.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김강석, "주요 중동국가들의 정치권력 구조 연구" 대외경제정책연구원 2011

      2 정상률, "사우디아라비아의 통치기본법에 나타난 종교적 정체성과 세속적 정체성" 중동문제연구소 10 (10): 1-24, 2011

      3 김종도, "사우디아라비아 통치기본법의 이슬람적 언표(言表)" 한국이슬람학회 21 (21): 99-118, 2011

      4 이원삼, "사우디아라비아 지도층의 노령화와 권력승계도 연구" 한국이슬람학회 22 (22): 85-109, 2012

      5 박종평, "사우디아라비아 왕정 체제와 이슬람" 중동연구소 23 (23): 33-56, 2004

      6 사우디아라비아의 통치기본법, "Saudi Arabia Royal Order No. A/90 27/8/1412"

      7 사우디아라비아 왕실충성위원회법, "Saudi Arabia Royal Order No. A/135 26/9/1427 AH"

      8 "Saudi Allegiance council ineffective: Saudi prince Talal"

      9 http://www.stratfor.com, "Challenges for the Saudi Royal Family: Succession"

      1 김강석, "주요 중동국가들의 정치권력 구조 연구" 대외경제정책연구원 2011

      2 정상률, "사우디아라비아의 통치기본법에 나타난 종교적 정체성과 세속적 정체성" 중동문제연구소 10 (10): 1-24, 2011

      3 김종도, "사우디아라비아 통치기본법의 이슬람적 언표(言表)" 한국이슬람학회 21 (21): 99-118, 2011

      4 이원삼, "사우디아라비아 지도층의 노령화와 권력승계도 연구" 한국이슬람학회 22 (22): 85-109, 2012

      5 박종평, "사우디아라비아 왕정 체제와 이슬람" 중동연구소 23 (23): 33-56, 2004

      6 사우디아라비아의 통치기본법, "Saudi Arabia Royal Order No. A/90 27/8/1412"

      7 사우디아라비아 왕실충성위원회법, "Saudi Arabia Royal Order No. A/135 26/9/1427 AH"

      8 "Saudi Allegiance council ineffective: Saudi prince Talal"

      9 http://www.stratfor.com, "Challenges for the Saudi Royal Family: Succession"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-07-04 학술지명변경 한글명 : 중동 연구 -> 중동연구 KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.34 0.34 0.3
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.25 0.24 0.792 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼