즉시 하중 임플란트에서 변연골 흡수량에 관한 후향적 연구 = Retrospective study on marginal bone resorption around immediately loaded implants

국문 초록 (Abstract)

목적: 원광대학교 치과대학병원 임플란트 센터에서 임플란트를 식립한 후 1주일 내에 임시보철물을 수복한 다음, 즉시 하중을 가한 환자들을 대상으로 골 흡수량을 측정하고자 하였다. 이러한 후향적 분석을 통하여 임플란트에 대한 즉시 하중의 임상적 근거를 보강하고 주의해야 할 사항 등을 파악하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2005년 1월 1일부터 2016년 6월 31일 사이에 원광대학교 치과대학병원 임플란트 센터에서 임플란트를 식립한 후 1주일 내에 임시보철물을 수복한 환자들을 대상으로 하여 진료기록부와 방사선 사진을 조사하였다. 총 임플란트의 수는 70개였으며, 임플란트의 제조회사, 길이, 직경, 체결 방식에 따른 변연골의 흡수량을 측정하였다. 변연골의 흡수량을 측정하기 위해 임플란트 식립 직후와 6개월 이후의 치근단 방사선 사진을 비교 분석하였다. 통계 프로그램인 SPSS 22.0을 이용하여 Mann-whitney U test와 Kruskal-wallis test를 시행하였다. 결과: 즉시 하중 임플란트 군에서 임플란트와 지대주의 연결 구조에 따른 변연골 흡수량을 비교한 결과 내부 육각 연결 구조 임플란트에서의 변연골 흡수량은 평균 $1.24{\pm}0.72mm$, 외부 육각 연결 구조 임플란트에서 $1.73{\pm}1.27mm$로 나타났으며 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다. 임플란트 제조회사, 길이, 직경에 따른 변연골 흡수량의 차이는 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 결론: 즉시 하중 임플란트에서 내부 육각 연결 구조 임플란트에서의 변연골 흡수량은 외부 육각 연결 구조 임플란트에서의 변연골 흡수량보다 적게 나타났으며, 임플란트의 다른 조건들에서는 변연골 흡수량에 차이를 보이지 않았다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: Patients who treated implant immediate loading within a week after implant placement at Wonkwang University Dental Hospital Implant Center were evaluated marginal bone resorption. These retrospective analyses are intended to reinforce the clinical evidence for the implant immediate loading. Materials and methods: Medical history and radiographic data were investigated, which were the patients' who treated implant immediate loading and restoration with provisional prostheses between January 2005 and June 2016, at Wonkwang University Dental Hospital Implant Center. Total number of implants was 70, marginal bone resorption was measured according to implant length, diameter and connection type. To measure marginal bone resorption, periapical radiographs were taken when the implants were placed and after 6 month. Statistical analysis was done in Mann-whitney U test and Kruskal-wallis test with SPSS 22.0 software (P<.05). Results: Mean marginal bone resorption around immediately loaded implants according to implant connection type was shown $1.24{\pm}0.72mm$ in internal hexagon connection type and $1.73{\pm}1.27mm$ in external hexagon connection type. There was no statically significant difference in marginal bone resorption with implant length and diameter. Conclusion: Implants with immediated loading in internal hexagon connection type showed less marginal bone resorption significantly than in external hexagon connection type.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Cochran DL, "The evidence for immediate loading of implants" 6 : 155-163, 2006

2 Branemark PI, "Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period" 16 : 1-132, 1977

3 Lemmerman KJ, "Osseointegrated dental implants in private practice: a long-term case series study" 76 : 310-319, 2005

4 Buser D, "Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants" 8 : 161-172, 1997

5 Esposito M, "Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants" (3) : 2013

6 Galindo-Moreno P, "Influence of the crown-implant connection on the preservation of peri-implant bone: a retrospective multifactorial analysis" 30 : 384-390, 2015

7 Himmlova L, "Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis" 91 : 20-25, 2004

8 Pierrisnard L, "Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution" 5 : 254-262, 2003

9 Chun HJ, "Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis" 21 : 195-202, 2006

10 Tsouknidas A, "Influence of alveolar bone loss and different alloys on the biomechanical behavior of internal-and external-connection implants: A three-dimensional finite element analysis" 30 : e30-e42, 2015

11 Ding X, "Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis" 18 : 393-402, 2009

12 Ellegaard B, "Implant therapy involving maxillary sinus lift in periodontally compromised patients" 8 : 305-315, 1997

13 Misch CE, "Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference" 17 : 5-15, 2008

14 Chaushu G, "Immediate loading of single-tooth implants: immediate versus non-immediate implantation. A clinical report" 16 : 267-272, 2001

15 Degidi M, "Immediate functional and non-functional loading of dental implants: a 2- to 60-month follow-up study of 646 titanium implants" 74 : 225-241, 2003

16 Schnitman PA, "Immediate fixed interim prostheses supported by two-stage threaded implants: methodology and results" 16 : 96-105, 1990

17 Feldman S, "Fiveyear survival distributions of short-length (10 mm or less) machined-surfaced and Osseotite implants" 6 : 16-23, 2004

18 Bergman B, "Evaluation of the results of treatment with osseointegrated implants by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare" 50 : 114-115, 1983

19 Malchiodi L, "Evaluation of the esthetic results of 64 nonfunctional immediately loaded postextraction implants in the maxilla: correlation between interproximal alveolar crest and soft tissues at 3 years of followup" 15 : 130-142, 2013

20 Ding X, "Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants" 11 : 279-287, 2009

21 Bragger U, "Digital subtraction radiography for the assessment of changes in peri-implant bone density" 6 : 160-166, 1991

22 Buser D, "Clinical experience with one-stage, non-submerged dental implants" 13 : 153-161, 1999

23 Queiroz PM, "Assessment of three methods of geometric image reconstruction for digital subtraction radiography" 45 : 20160120-, 2016