RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      일제하 동북아 관세문제와 조선의 대‘중국’ 무역 = Customs duties of North East Asia and the Chosun’s Trade with ‘China’ during the Japanese Imperial Era

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99723390

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      After ‘annexation of Korea’, Japan could integrate Korea politically and militarily except for the customs duties. Japan promised that Japan will maintain Chosun customs duties for 10 years under the sensitive international political situation in the North East Asia where superpower countries show very keen attention to the Chosun customs duties, In August 1920, Office of Chosun Governor could apply ‘Japanese Customs Duties Law’ to Chosun and attain the ‘Annexation of Korea’ in economic sense. China lost its autonomous right of customs duties as a result of treaties with foreign governments. But later the Western superpowers admitted autonomy of Chinese customs duties in 1928 as the ‘Peoples Revolution of China’ succeeded and Japan approved the autonomy of Chinese customs duties in May, 1930. Subsequently, Chinese government gradually increased the tariffs rates. After invasion of Manchuria, Manchuria government separated the customs administration from China and strengthened the preferred tariff alliance with Chosun and ultimately integration with Chosun tariff was made in May 1944. As the puppet government was established in China after Sino-Japanese war, favorable conditions were given to the Korean export goods applying ‘pro-Japanese favorable tariffs.’ Under the situation that Chosun customs tariffs are still maintained after the ‘Annexation of Korea’, Japan developed various policy schemes to build an economic foundation for invasion to Manchuria and, as a result, export and import trade with ‘China’, in particular, with Manchuria area, further increased. On the export side, rice was the main item shipped to Manchuria as the rice demands of the immigrants from Japan and Korea to Manchuria increased and to make up food supply shortage incurred by the rice export, huge volume of millet was imported from Manchuria. As the ‘Japanese Customs Duties Law’ started to be applied to Chosun in 1920 and under the consequences of boycott of Japanese goods spurred by ‘People’s Revolution of China’ and the ‘Baehwa anti-Japanese riot’, trade with ‘China’ relatively declined or stagnated. In particular, the trade volume of Chosun with China dropped drastically after world great economic depression in 1929 and recovery of Chinese autonomy of customs duties in 1930. Export and import trade with Manchuria suddenly increased since Japanese aggression to the North Chinese Continent and the establishment of the Government of Manchuria. In particular, rice export became important inevitably in pursuing the war.
      번역하기

      After ‘annexation of Korea’, Japan could integrate Korea politically and militarily except for the customs duties. Japan promised that Japan will maintain Chosun customs duties for 10 years under the sensitive international political situation in ...

      After ‘annexation of Korea’, Japan could integrate Korea politically and militarily except for the customs duties. Japan promised that Japan will maintain Chosun customs duties for 10 years under the sensitive international political situation in the North East Asia where superpower countries show very keen attention to the Chosun customs duties, In August 1920, Office of Chosun Governor could apply ‘Japanese Customs Duties Law’ to Chosun and attain the ‘Annexation of Korea’ in economic sense. China lost its autonomous right of customs duties as a result of treaties with foreign governments. But later the Western superpowers admitted autonomy of Chinese customs duties in 1928 as the ‘Peoples Revolution of China’ succeeded and Japan approved the autonomy of Chinese customs duties in May, 1930. Subsequently, Chinese government gradually increased the tariffs rates. After invasion of Manchuria, Manchuria government separated the customs administration from China and strengthened the preferred tariff alliance with Chosun and ultimately integration with Chosun tariff was made in May 1944. As the puppet government was established in China after Sino-Japanese war, favorable conditions were given to the Korean export goods applying ‘pro-Japanese favorable tariffs.’ Under the situation that Chosun customs tariffs are still maintained after the ‘Annexation of Korea’, Japan developed various policy schemes to build an economic foundation for invasion to Manchuria and, as a result, export and import trade with ‘China’, in particular, with Manchuria area, further increased. On the export side, rice was the main item shipped to Manchuria as the rice demands of the immigrants from Japan and Korea to Manchuria increased and to make up food supply shortage incurred by the rice export, huge volume of millet was imported from Manchuria. As the ‘Japanese Customs Duties Law’ started to be applied to Chosun in 1920 and under the consequences of boycott of Japanese goods spurred by ‘People’s Revolution of China’ and the ‘Baehwa anti-Japanese riot’, trade with ‘China’ relatively declined or stagnated. In particular, the trade volume of Chosun with China dropped drastically after world great economic depression in 1929 and recovery of Chinese autonomy of customs duties in 1930. Export and import trade with Manchuria suddenly increased since Japanese aggression to the North Chinese Continent and the establishment of the Government of Manchuria. In particular, rice export became important inevitably in pursuing the war.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 동북아 국제정세와 관세문제
      • Ⅲ. 조선의 대‘중국’무역 실상
      • Ⅳ. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 동북아 국제정세와 관세문제
      • Ⅲ. 조선의 대‘중국’무역 실상
      • Ⅳ. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • 〈ABSTRACT〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 구대열, "한국 국제관계사연구 1" 역사비평사 1995

      2 박정현, "중일전쟁 시기 國統區 대외무역과국민정부의 무역정책" 역사교육학회 (46) : 275-306, 2011

      3 송규진, "조선의 ‘관세문제’와 식민지관세법의 형성" 한국사학회 (99) : 185-222, 2010

      4 송규진, "일제하 조선과 만주국의 무역에 관한 연구" 한국중국학회 52 : 2005

      5 송규진, "일제하 관세정책의 변화가 조건의 대중국 무역에 끼친 영향" 아세아문제연구소 47 (47): 243-281, 2004

      6 송규진, "일제하 ‘일본관세법’의 조선적용과 변용" 고려사학회 (32) : 379-409, 2008

      7 송규진, "일제하 ‘쌀이출 좁쌀수입’ 구조의 전개과정" 55 : 2002

      8 정재정, "일제침략과 한국철도-1 1892〜1945" 서울대학교 출판부 1999

      9 김주용, "일제의 간도 경제침략과 한인사회" 선인 2008

      10 강진아, "식민지 대만과 조선의 對中貿易 구조 비교" 대구사학회 81 : 123-164, 2005

      1 구대열, "한국 국제관계사연구 1" 역사비평사 1995

      2 박정현, "중일전쟁 시기 國統區 대외무역과국민정부의 무역정책" 역사교육학회 (46) : 275-306, 2011

      3 송규진, "조선의 ‘관세문제’와 식민지관세법의 형성" 한국사학회 (99) : 185-222, 2010

      4 송규진, "일제하 조선과 만주국의 무역에 관한 연구" 한국중국학회 52 : 2005

      5 송규진, "일제하 관세정책의 변화가 조건의 대중국 무역에 끼친 영향" 아세아문제연구소 47 (47): 243-281, 2004

      6 송규진, "일제하 ‘일본관세법’의 조선적용과 변용" 고려사학회 (32) : 379-409, 2008

      7 송규진, "일제하 ‘쌀이출 좁쌀수입’ 구조의 전개과정" 55 : 2002

      8 정재정, "일제침략과 한국철도-1 1892〜1945" 서울대학교 출판부 1999

      9 김주용, "일제의 간도 경제침략과 한인사회" 선인 2008

      10 강진아, "식민지 대만과 조선의 對中貿易 구조 비교" 대구사학회 81 : 123-164, 2005

      11 최문형, "국제관계로 본 러일전쟁과 일본의 한국병합" 지식산업사 2004

      12 小林行昌, "關税經濟論" 巖松堂書店 1937

      13 東洋拓殖株式會社京城支店, "間島事情"

      14 한국일보사, "財界回顧 1" 1981

      15 "毎日申(新)報"

      16 "東亞日報"

      17 服部龍ニ, "東アジア國際環境と日本外交1918-1931" 有斐閣 2001

      18 川島信太郞, "本邦通商政策條約史概論" 巖松堂書店 1940

      19 "朝鮮貿易年表"

      20 "朝鮮貿易協會通報"

      21 "朝鮮總督府施政年報"

      22 朝鮮銀行調査課, "朝鮮經濟年報"

      23 "朝鮮彙報"

      24 朝鮮總督府, "朝鮮に於ける支那人"

      25 東亞經濟調査局, "日滿關税政策の研究" 東亞經濟調査局 1933

      26 山本有造, "日本植民地經濟史研究" 名古屋大學出版會 1992

      27 "日本外交文書"

      28 송규진, "日帝下의 朝鮮貿易 硏究" 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 2001

      29 김태웅, "日帝下 群山府 華僑의 存在形態와 活動樣相" 역사문화학회 13 (13): 397-439, 2010

      30 久保亨, "戦間期中國〈自立への摸索〉-關税通貨政策と經濟發展" 東京大出版會 1999

      31 小林英夫, "大東亞共榮圈」の形成と崩壞" 御茶の水書房 1975

      32 강진아, "中日 무역마찰의 전개와 朝中關係의 변화, In 근대전환기 동아시아속의 한국" 성균관대 학교출판부 2004

      33 姬田光義, "中國近現代史" 일월서각 1985

      34 鄭友彳癸, "中國的對外貿易和工業發展" 上海社會科學院出版社 1984

      35 孫玉琴, "中國對外貿易史第2册" 對外經濟貿易大學出版社 2004

      36 박제균, "中國國民黨의 民族主義 理念과 ‘革命外交’" 중국근현대사학회 (31) : 51-96, 2006

      37 外務省, "世界各國の關税制度" 日本國際協會 1937

      38 "三千里"

      39 HO PING-YIN, "THE FOREINGN TRADE OF CHINA" THE COMMERCIAL PRESS 1935

      40 송규진, "1930년대 이후 조선의 대중국 무역" 동양학연구원 (39) : 93-116, 2006

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (재인증)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.15 1.15 1.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.21 1.16 2.615 0.53
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼